Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks

Read original: arXiv:2108.11204 - Published 4/4/2024 by Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzyg'o'zd'z, Marek Zbysi'nski, Micha{l} Zawalski, Krzysztof Olejnik, Yuhuai Wu, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's
Total Score

0

📊

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper proposes a new method called Subgoal Search (kSubS) for solving complex reasoning tasks.
  • kSubS uses a learned subgoal generator to produce a diverse set of achievable subgoals that are closer to the final solution.
  • Using subgoals reduces the search space and enables efficient planning.
  • The method is evaluated on three challenging domains: Sokoban, Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark.
  • kSubS achieves strong results, including state-of-the-art performance on the inequality proving benchmark.

Plain English Explanation

Solving complex reasoning tasks can be like navigating a maze. You know the starting point and the final destination, but the path in between is full of obstacles and dead ends. Humans excel at this type of problem-solving by mentally breaking down the task into smaller, more manageable steps or "subgoals."

The authors of this paper were inspired by this human ability and developed a method called Subgoal Search (kSubS) to mimic this process. The key component of kSubS is a machine learning model that generates a diverse set of achievable subgoals that are closer to the final solution. By focusing on these subgoals rather than the entire problem, the search space is significantly reduced, making it easier to find the optimal path.

The researchers tested kSubS on three challenging domains: two popular puzzle games (Sokoban and Rubik's Cube) and a benchmark for proving mathematical inequalities. In all cases, kSubS was able to outperform previous methods, even achieving state-of-the-art results on the inequality proving benchmark, all while using a relatively modest amount of computational resources.

Technical Explanation

The core innovation of the Subgoal Search (kSubS) method is the use of a learned subgoal generator. This component, based on a transformer architecture, is trained to produce a diverse set of subgoals that are both achievable and closer to the final solution. By focusing the search on these subgoals, the overall search space is significantly reduced, making it easier to find the optimal path.

The subgoal generator is coupled with a classical best-first search framework, which uses the subgoals to guide the search process. The authors show that a simple approach of generating k-th step ahead subgoals is surprisingly effective across the three challenging domains they evaluated: Sokoban, Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark (INT).

On Sokoban and Rubik's Cube, kSubS is able to match or exceed the performance of state-of-the-art methods. But the most impressive result is on the INT benchmark, where kSubS achieves new state-of-the-art results, all while using a modest computational budget.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of the power of the kSubS method, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research.

One potential concern is the reliance on the subgoal generator, which is a learned component. While the authors show that it is surprisingly effective, the subgoal generator's performance could be sensitive to the training data and hyperparameters. Evaluating the robustness of this component would be an important next step.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a few specific domains, and it's unclear how well kSubS would generalize to other complex reasoning tasks. Further research is needed to understand the broader applicability of the method.

Finally, the authors do not deeply explore the interpretability of the subgoals generated by their model. Understanding why certain subgoals are chosen and how they relate to the overall problem-solving process could provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

The Subgoal Search (kSubS) method proposed in this paper represents an exciting advance in solving complex reasoning tasks. By mimicking the human ability to break down problems into manageable subgoals, kSubS is able to significantly reduce the search space and achieve strong results, even outperforming state-of-the-art methods on challenging benchmarks.

While the paper highlights some limitations and areas for further research, the core ideas behind kSubS have the potential to inspire new approaches to complex problem-solving, with applications ranging from game-playing to mathematical reasoning and beyond. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, techniques like kSubS may play an increasingly important role in bridging the gap between human and machine intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

Total Score

0

Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks

Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzyg'o'zd'z, Marek Zbysi'nski, Micha{l} Zawalski, Krzysztof Olejnik, Yuhuai Wu, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's

Humans excel in solving complex reasoning tasks through a mental process of moving from one idea to a related one. Inspired by this, we propose Subgoal Search (kSubS) method. Its key component is a learned subgoal generator that produces a diversity of subgoals that are both achievable and closer to the solution. Using subgoals reduces the search space and induces a high-level search graph suitable for efficient planning. In this paper, we implement kSubS using a transformer-based subgoal module coupled with the classical best-first search framework. We show that a simple approach of generating $k$-th step ahead subgoals is surprisingly efficient on three challenging domains: two popular puzzle games, Sokoban and the Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark INT. kSubS achieves strong results including state-of-the-art on INT within a modest computational budget.

Read more

4/4/2024

SubgoalXL: Subgoal-based Expert Learning for Theorem Proving
Total Score

0

SubgoalXL: Subgoal-based Expert Learning for Theorem Proving

Xueliang Zhao, Lin Zheng, Haige Bo, Changran Hu, Urmish Thakker, Lingpeng Kong

Formal theorem proving, a field at the intersection of mathematics and computer science, has seen renewed interest with advancements in large language models (LLMs). This paper introduces SubgoalXL, a novel approach that synergizes subgoal-based proofs with expert learning to enhance LLMs' capabilities in formal theorem proving within the Isabelle environment. SubgoalXL addresses two critical challenges: the scarcity of specialized mathematics and theorem-proving data, and the need for improved multi-step reasoning abilities in LLMs. By optimizing data efficiency and employing subgoal-level supervision, SubgoalXL extracts richer information from limited human-generated proofs. The framework integrates subgoal-oriented proof strategies with an expert learning system, iteratively refining formal statement, proof, and subgoal generators. Leveraging the Isabelle environment's advantages in subgoal-based proofs, SubgoalXL achieves a new state-of-the-art performance of 56.1% in Isabelle on the standard miniF2F dataset, marking an absolute improvement of 4.9%. Notably, SubgoalXL successfully solves 41 AMC12, 9 AIME, and 3 IMO problems from miniF2F. These results underscore the effectiveness of maximizing limited data utility and employing targeted guidance for complex reasoning in formal theorem proving, contributing to the ongoing advancement of AI reasoning capabilities. The implementation is available at url{https://github.com/zhaoxlpku/SubgoalXL}.

Read more

8/22/2024

What Matters in Hierarchical Search for Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?
Total Score

0

What Matters in Hierarchical Search for Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?

Micha{l} Zawalski, Gracjan G'oral, Micha{l} Tyrolski, Emilia Wi'snios, Franciszek Budrowski, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's

Efficiently tackling combinatorial reasoning problems, particularly the notorious NP-hard tasks, remains a significant challenge for AI research. Recent efforts have sought to enhance planning by incorporating hierarchical high-level search strategies, known as subgoal methods. While promising, their performance against traditional low-level planners is inconsistent, raising questions about their application contexts. In this study, we conduct an in-depth exploration of subgoal-planning methods for combinatorial reasoning. We identify the attributes pivotal for leveraging the advantages of high-level search: hard-to-learn value functions, complex action spaces, presence of dead ends in the environment, or using data collected from diverse experts. We propose a consistent evaluation methodology to achieve meaningful comparisons between methods and reevaluate the state-of-the-art algorithms.

Read more

8/15/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Solving Sequential Manipulation Puzzles by Finding Easier Subproblems

Svetlana Levit, Joaquim Ortiz-Haro, Marc Toussaint

We consider a set of challenging sequential manipulation puzzles, where an agent has to interact with multiple movable objects and navigate narrow passages. Such settings are notoriously difficult for Task-and-Motion Planners, as they require interdependent regrasps and solving hard motion planning problems. In this paper, we propose to search over sequences of easier pick-and-place subproblems, which can lead to the solution of the manipulation puzzle. Our method combines a heuristic-driven forward search of subproblems with an optimization-based Task-and-Motion Planning solver. To guide the search, we introduce heuristics to generate and prioritize useful subgoals. We evaluate our approach on various manually designed and automatically generated scenes, demonstrating the benefits of auxiliary subproblems in sequential manipulation planning.

Read more

5/6/2024