What Matters in Hierarchical Search for Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores hierarchical search methods for solving complex combinatorial reasoning problems, such as logical puzzles and planning tasks.
- The authors investigate what factors are most important for the performance of these hierarchical search algorithms, including the choice of heuristic, the depth of the search tree, and the representation of the problem.
- The paper presents experimental results on several benchmark domains and provides insights into the strengths and limitations of different hierarchical search approaches.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about a type of AI algorithm that can solve complex logic puzzles and planning problems by breaking them down into smaller, easier-to-solve steps. These algorithms use a "hierarchical search" approach, which means they explore different ways of solving the problem at multiple levels of abstraction.
The key question the authors want to answer is: what aspects of the hierarchical search process are most important for getting good performance on these types of reasoning problems? For example, does it matter a lot what kind of "heuristic" (or "rule of thumb") the algorithm uses to guide its search? Or is the depth of the search tree (how many levels it explores) more important?
To find out, the researchers ran experiments on several benchmark problems, like logical puzzles and planning tasks. They tried out different variations of the hierarchical search algorithm and measured how well each one performed. The results give us insights into the strengths and limitations of this approach to complex reasoning and suggest ways the algorithms could be improved.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on hierarchical search methods for solving combinatorial reasoning problems, where the goal is to find a sequence of actions or decisions that solve a given task. The authors investigate the key factors that influence the performance of these hierarchical search algorithms, including:
- The choice of heuristic function, which guides the search process by estimating the "cost-to-go" from the current state to the goal.
- The depth of the search tree, determining how many levels of abstraction the algorithm explores.
- The problem representation, which can impact the structure of the search space and the effectiveness of the heuristic.
The paper presents experiments on several benchmark domains, such as logical puzzles and planning tasks. The authors compare the performance of different hierarchical search algorithms, including subgoal-guided search, self-guiding exploration, and heuristic-guided problem-solving. The results provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these approaches and suggest that the choice of heuristic is a crucial factor in the performance of hierarchical search for complex reasoning tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough exploration of hierarchical search methods for combinatorial reasoning problems, and the experimental results offer valuable insights. However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
- The benchmark tasks used in the experiments, while representative of common reasoning problems, may not capture the full complexity and diversity of real-world applications. More testing on a wider range of problems would be beneficial.
- The paper focuses on traditional search-based approaches and does not explore the potential of large language models as hyper-heuristics for these types of reasoning problems.
- The analysis of heuristic choice and search depth could be expanded to provide more detailed guidance on how to design effective hierarchical search algorithms for different problem domains.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of hierarchical search methods for combinatorial reasoning, but further research is needed to fully address the challenges in this area.
Conclusion
This paper investigates the key factors that influence the performance of hierarchical search algorithms for solving complex combinatorial reasoning problems, such as logical puzzles and planning tasks. The experimental results provide insights into the importance of the heuristic function, the depth of the search tree, and the problem representation for the effectiveness of these algorithms.
The findings suggest that the choice of heuristic is a crucial factor in the performance of hierarchical search, and that further research is needed to develop more robust and versatile algorithms for complex reasoning tasks. The paper lays the groundwork for continued advances in this area, with potential applications in fields like automated planning, problem-solving, and decision-making.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
What Matters in Hierarchical Search for Combinatorial Reasoning Problems?
Micha{l} Zawalski, Gracjan G'oral, Micha{l} Tyrolski, Emilia Wi'snios, Franciszek Budrowski, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's
Efficiently tackling combinatorial reasoning problems, particularly the notorious NP-hard tasks, remains a significant challenge for AI research. Recent efforts have sought to enhance planning by incorporating hierarchical high-level search strategies, known as subgoal methods. While promising, their performance against traditional low-level planners is inconsistent, raising questions about their application contexts. In this study, we conduct an in-depth exploration of subgoal-planning methods for combinatorial reasoning. We identify the attributes pivotal for leveraging the advantages of high-level search: hard-to-learn value functions, complex action spaces, presence of dead ends in the environment, or using data collected from diverse experts. We propose a consistent evaluation methodology to achieve meaningful comparisons between methods and reevaluate the state-of-the-art algorithms.
Read more8/15/2024
📊
0
Subgoal Search For Complex Reasoning Tasks
Konrad Czechowski, Tomasz Odrzyg'o'zd'z, Marek Zbysi'nski, Micha{l} Zawalski, Krzysztof Olejnik, Yuhuai Wu, {L}ukasz Kuci'nski, Piotr Mi{l}o's
Humans excel in solving complex reasoning tasks through a mental process of moving from one idea to a related one. Inspired by this, we propose Subgoal Search (kSubS) method. Its key component is a learned subgoal generator that produces a diversity of subgoals that are both achievable and closer to the solution. Using subgoals reduces the search space and induces a high-level search graph suitable for efficient planning. In this paper, we implement kSubS using a transformer-based subgoal module coupled with the classical best-first search framework. We show that a simple approach of generating $k$-th step ahead subgoals is surprisingly efficient on three challenging domains: two popular puzzle games, Sokoban and the Rubik's Cube, and an inequality proving benchmark INT. kSubS achieves strong results including state-of-the-art on INT within a modest computational budget.
Read more4/4/2024
0
Self-Guiding Exploration for Combinatorial Problems
Zangir Iklassov, Yali Du, Farkhad Akimov, Martin Takac
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become pivotal in addressing reasoning tasks across diverse domains, including arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning. They utilize prompting techniques such as Exploration-of-Thought, Decomposition, and Refinement to effectively navigate and solve intricate tasks. Despite these advancements, the application of LLMs to Combinatorial Problems (CPs), known for their NP-hardness and critical roles in logistics and resource management remains underexplored. To address this gap, we introduce a novel prompting strategy: Self-Guiding Exploration (SGE), designed to enhance the performance of solving CPs. SGE operates autonomously, generating multiple thought trajectories for each CP task. It then breaks these trajectories down into actionable subtasks, executes them sequentially, and refines the results to ensure optimal outcomes. We present our research as the first to apply LLMs to a broad range of CPs and demonstrate that SGE outperforms existing prompting strategies by over 27.84% in CP optimization performance. Additionally, SGE achieves a 2.46% higher accuracy over the best existing results in other reasoning tasks (arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic).
Read more5/29/2024
0
Subgoal-based Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Agent Collaboration
Cheng Xu, Changtian Zhang, Yuchen Shi, Ran Wang, Shihong Duan, Yadong Wan, Xiaotong Zhang
Recent advancements in reinforcement learning have made significant impacts across various domains, yet they often struggle in complex multi-agent environments due to issues like algorithm instability, low sampling efficiency, and the challenges of exploration and dimensionality explosion. Hierarchical reinforcement learning (HRL) offers a structured approach to decompose complex tasks into simpler sub-tasks, which is promising for multi-agent settings. This paper advances the field by introducing a hierarchical architecture that autonomously generates effective subgoals without explicit constraints, enhancing both flexibility and stability in training. We propose a dynamic goal generation strategy that adapts based on environmental changes. This method significantly improves the adaptability and sample efficiency of the learning process. Furthermore, we address the critical issue of credit assignment in multi-agent systems by synergizing our hierarchical architecture with a modified QMIX network, thus improving overall strategy coordination and efficiency. Comparative experiments with mainstream reinforcement learning algorithms demonstrate the superior convergence speed and performance of our approach in both single-agent and multi-agent environments, confirming its effectiveness and flexibility in complex scenarios. Our code is open-sourced at: url{https://github.com/SICC-Group/GMAH}.
Read more8/22/2024