Supervised Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samples
0
👨🏫
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Contrastive learning (CL) is a technique that learns useful representations by pulling positive samples close together and pushing negative samples far apart in the embedding space.
- In unsupervised contrastive learning (UCL), negative samples are chosen randomly, which can lead to "class collisions" where samples from different classes are close together.
- Supervised contrastive learning (SCL) avoids this issue by conditioning the negative sampling distribution on samples with different labels.
- Hard-UCL (H-UCL) further enhances UCL by tilting the negative sampling distribution towards samples closer to the anchor.
- This paper proposes Hard-SCL (H-SCL), which combines the benefits of SCL and H-UCL by tilting the class-conditional negative sampling distribution.
Plain English Explanation
Contrastive learning is a technique used to learn useful representations of data, like images or text. It works by pulling together samples that are similar (called "positive" samples) and pushing apart samples that are different (called "negative" samples). This helps the model learn to distinguish between different types of data.
In unsupervised contrastive learning (UCL), the negative samples are chosen randomly, which can sometimes lead to "class collisions" - where samples from different classes (e.g., different types of objects in an image) end up being close together in the representation space. This can make it harder for the model to learn effective representations.
To address this, supervised contrastive learning (SCL) conditions the negative sampling on samples with different labels. This helps the model learn representations that better separate the different classes.
The paper introduces a new method called Hard-SCL (H-SCL), which builds on SCL by further "tilting" the negative sampling distribution towards samples that are closer to the anchor (the sample being trained on). This helps the model focus on learning to separate the most similar-looking negative samples, which can lead to better representations.
Technical Explanation
Contrastive learning learns a useful representation function by minimizing a loss function like the InfoNCE loss, which pulls positive samples (created using label-preserving transformations) close together and pushes negative samples far apart in the embedding space.
In unsupervised contrastive learning (UCL), where class labels are not available, negative samples are typically chosen randomly from the dataset. This can lead to "class collisions" where negative samples from different classes are close together in the embedding space.
Supervised contrastive learning (SCL) avoids this issue by conditioning the negative sampling distribution on samples with different labels than the anchor (the sample being trained on). This helps the model learn representations that better separate the different classes.
The paper introduces Hard-SCL (H-SCL), which builds on SCL by further "tilting" the class-conditional negative sampling distribution towards samples that are closer to the anchor. This is inspired by the success of Hard-UCL (H-UCL), which has been shown to enhance UCL by tilting the negative sampling distribution in this way.
The authors provide a theoretical analysis showing that, under certain assumptions, the H-SCL loss is upper bounded by the H-UCL loss. This suggests that H-UCL can be used to control the H-SCL loss even when label information is not available. Experiments on several datasets verify this assumption and the claimed inequality between H-UCL and H-SCL losses.
The paper also discusses a plausible scenario where the H-SCL loss is lower bounded by the UCL loss, indicating the limited utility of UCL in controlling the H-SCL loss.
Critical Analysis
The paper introduces a novel contrastive learning method, H-SCL, that builds on the strengths of both unsupervised and supervised contrastive learning. The theoretical analysis and experimental results provide a strong justification for the proposed approach.
One potential limitation is the assumption of infinite negative samples per anchor required for the analytical results. In practice, the number of negative samples is often limited by computational constraints. It would be interesting to explore the performance of H-SCL under more realistic negative sampling scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential trade-offs or downsides of the H-SCL approach. For example, the increased focus on hard negative samples may make the model more susceptible to overfitting or adversarial examples. Further investigation into the robustness and generalization properties of H-SCL would be valuable.
Finally, the paper focuses on the performance gains in downstream classification tasks, but other potential applications of contrastive learning, such as unsupervised or semi-supervised learning, are not explored. Exploring the broader utility of H-SCL across different machine learning problems would help further demonstrate its significance.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel contrastive learning method called Hard-SCL (H-SCL) that combines the benefits of supervised contrastive learning and hard negative mining. By tilting the class-conditional negative sampling distribution towards harder negative samples, H-SCL is shown to outperform standard supervised contrastive learning in downstream classification tasks.
The theoretical analysis and experimental results provide a solid foundation for the H-SCL approach, suggesting it can effectively learn representations that better separate different classes of data. While the paper focuses on classification, the implications of this work could extend to other areas of machine learning that rely on learning useful data representations, such as medical image analysis or natural language processing.
Overall, the H-SCL method represents an important advancement in contrastive learning, providing a novel approach to enhance the separation of different classes of data in the learned representation space.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👨🏫
0
Supervised Contrastive Learning with Hard Negative Samples
Ruijie Jiang, Thuan Nguyen, Prakash Ishwar, Shuchin Aeron
Through minimization of an appropriate loss function such as the InfoNCE loss, contrastive learning (CL) learns a useful representation function by pulling positive samples close to each other while pushing negative samples far apart in the embedding space. The positive samples are typically created using label-preserving augmentations, i.e., domain-specific transformations of a given datum or anchor. In absence of class information, in unsupervised CL (UCL), the negative samples are typically chosen randomly and independently of the anchor from a preset negative sampling distribution over the entire dataset. This leads to class-collisions in UCL. Supervised CL (SCL), avoids this class collision by conditioning the negative sampling distribution to samples having labels different from that of the anchor. In hard-UCL (H-UCL), which has been shown to be an effective method to further enhance UCL, the negative sampling distribution is conditionally tilted, by means of a hardening function, towards samples that are closer to the anchor. Motivated by this, in this paper we propose hard-SCL (H-SCL) {wherein} the class conditional negative sampling distribution {is tilted} via a hardening function. Our simulation results confirm the utility of H-SCL over SCL with significant performance gains {in downstream classification tasks.} Analytically, we show that {in the} limit of infinite negative samples per anchor and a suitable assumption, the {H-SCL loss} is upper bounded by the {H-UCL loss}, thereby justifying the utility of H-UCL {for controlling} the H-SCL loss in the absence of label information. Through experiments on several datasets, we verify the assumption as well as the claimed inequality between H-UCL and H-SCL losses. We also provide a plausible scenario where H-SCL loss is lower bounded by UCL loss, indicating the limited utility of UCL in controlling the H-SCL loss.
Read more5/13/2024
0
Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positives
Dewen Zeng, Yawen Wu, Xinrong Hu, Xiaowei Xu, Yiyu Shi
Contrastive learning with the nearest neighbor has proved to be one of the most efficient self-supervised learning (SSL) techniques by utilizing the similarity of multiple instances within the same class. However, its efficacy is constrained as the nearest neighbor algorithm primarily identifies ``easy'' positive pairs, where the representations are already closely located in the embedding space. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach called Contrastive Learning with Synthetic Positives (CLSP) that utilizes synthetic images, generated by an unconditional diffusion model, as the additional positives to help the model learn from diverse positives. Through feature interpolation in the diffusion model sampling process, we generate images with distinct backgrounds yet similar semantic content to the anchor image. These images are considered ``hard'' positives for the anchor image, and when included as supplementary positives in the contrastive loss, they contribute to a performance improvement of over 2% and 1% in linear evaluation compared to the previous NNCLR and All4One methods across multiple benchmark datasets such as CIFAR10, achieving state-of-the-art methods. On transfer learning benchmarks, CLSP outperforms existing SSL frameworks on 6 out of 8 downstream datasets. We believe CLSP establishes a valuable baseline for future SSL studies incorporating synthetic data in the training process.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Learning the Unlearned: Mitigating Feature Suppression in Contrastive Learning
Jihai Zhang, Xiang Lan, Xiaoye Qu, Yu Cheng, Mengling Feng, Bryan Hooi
Self-Supervised Contrastive Learning has proven effective in deriving high-quality representations from unlabeled data. However, a major challenge that hinders both unimodal and multimodal contrastive learning is feature suppression, a phenomenon where the trained model captures only a limited portion of the information from the input data while overlooking other potentially valuable content. This issue often leads to indistinguishable representations for visually similar but semantically different inputs, adversely affecting downstream task performance, particularly those requiring rigorous semantic comprehension. To address this challenge, we propose a novel model-agnostic Multistage Contrastive Learning (MCL) framework. Unlike standard contrastive learning which inherently captures one single biased feature distribution, MCL progressively learns previously unlearned features through feature-aware negative sampling at each stage, where the negative samples of an anchor are exclusively selected from the cluster it was assigned to in preceding stages. Meanwhile, MCL preserves the previously well-learned features by cross-stage representation integration, integrating features across all stages to form final representations. Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates MCL's effectiveness and superiority across both unimodal and multimodal contrastive learning, spanning a range of model architectures from ResNet to Vision Transformers (ViT). Remarkably, in tasks where the original CLIP model has shown limitations, MCL dramatically enhances performance, with improvements up to threefold on specific attributes in the recently proposed MMVP benchmark.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Adaptive Multi-head Contrastive Learning
Lei Wang, Piotr Koniusz, Tom Gedeon, Liang Zheng
In contrastive learning, two views of an original image, generated by different augmentations, are considered a positive pair, and their similarity is required to be high. Similarly, two views of distinct images form a negative pair, with encouraged low similarity. Typically, a single similarity measure, provided by a lone projection head, evaluates positive and negative sample pairs. However, due to diverse augmentation strategies and varying intra-sample similarity, views from the same image may not always be similar. Additionally, owing to inter-sample similarity, views from different images may be more akin than those from the same image. Consequently, enforcing high similarity for positive pairs and low similarity for negative pairs may be unattainable, and in some cases, such enforcement could detrimentally impact performance. To address this challenge, we propose using multiple projection heads, each producing a distinct set of features. Our pre-training loss function emerges from a solution to the maximum likelihood estimation over head-wise posterior distributions of positive samples given observations. This loss incorporates the similarity measure over positive and negative pairs, each re-weighted by an individual adaptive temperature, regulated to prevent ill solutions. Our approach, Adaptive Multi-Head Contrastive Learning (AMCL), can be applied to and experimentally enhances several popular contrastive learning methods such as SimCLR, MoCo, and Barlow Twins. The improvement remains consistent across various backbones and linear probing epochs, and becomes more significant when employing multiple augmentation methods.
Read more9/24/2024