Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation for Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning

2405.17243

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/28/2024 by Adriana Hugessen, Roger Creus Castanyer, Faisal Mohamed, Glen Berseth
Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation for Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning

Abstract

Both entropy-minimizing and entropy-maximizing (curiosity) objectives for unsupervised reinforcement learning (RL) have been shown to be effective in different environments, depending on the environment's level of natural entropy. However, neither method alone results in an agent that will consistently learn intelligent behavior across environments. In an effort to find a single entropy-based method that will encourage emergent behaviors in any environment, we propose an agent that can adapt its objective online, depending on the entropy conditions by framing the choice as a multi-armed bandit problem. We devise a novel intrinsic feedback signal for the bandit, which captures the agent's ability to control the entropy in its environment. We demonstrate that such agents can learn to control entropy and exhibit emergent behaviors in both high- and low-entropy regimes and can learn skillful behaviors in benchmark tasks. Videos of the trained agents and summarized findings can be found on our project page https://sites.google.com/view/surprise-adaptive-agents

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper introduces a new intrinsic reward mechanism called "Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation" (SAIM) for unsupervised reinforcement learning agents.
  • The goal is to encourage exploration in complex environments by rewarding agents for encountering novel or surprising situations, while adaptively adjusting the reward signal to maintain an optimal level of surprise.
  • The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SAIM in several simulated environments, showing that it can lead to more efficient exploration and better learning performance compared to existing intrinsic motivation approaches.

Plain English Explanation

Reinforcement learning agents are often trained to maximize some kind of reward signal, which can come from the environment or be provided by a human designer. However, in many complex environments, it can be challenging for the agent to discover rewarding behaviors on its own, especially early in the learning process.

The Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration Without Harm from Observational Data and Constrained Ensemble Exploration for Unsupervised Skill Discovery papers have explored using intrinsic rewards to encourage exploration, but these approaches can sometimes lead to agents becoming stuck in local optima or exhibiting undesirable behaviors.

The [Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation for Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning] paper proposes a new approach called "Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation" (SAIM) that aims to address these issues. The key idea is to reward the agent for encountering novel or surprising situations, but to adaptively adjust the strength of this reward signal over time to maintain an optimal level of surprise.

For example, imagine a robot exploring a maze. Early on, the robot might receive a lot of intrinsic reward for discovering new rooms or corridors, as these are highly surprising. However, as the robot becomes more familiar with the maze, the same rooms and corridors become less surprising, and the intrinsic reward should decrease to avoid the robot getting stuck in a "surprise-seeking" loop.

The Convergence of Model-free Entropy-regularized Inverse Reinforcement Learning and Examining Policy Entropy in Reinforcement Learning Agents for Personalization papers have explored related ideas of using entropy-based intrinsic rewards to encourage exploration, but SAIM provides a more sophisticated and adaptive approach.

By adjusting the intrinsic reward signal in response to the agent's learning progress, SAIM helps the agent strike a balance between exploration and exploitation, ultimately leading to more efficient and effective learning in complex environments.

Technical Explanation

The key components of the SAIM approach are:

  1. Surprise Estimation: The agent maintains a model of the environment dynamics, which it uses to estimate the "surprise" of each observed state or transition. Surprise is quantified as the negative log-probability of the observed state or transition under the agent's current model.

  2. Intrinsic Reward Calculation: The intrinsic reward is calculated as a function of the current surprise estimate, with the goal of maintaining an optimal level of surprise. This is achieved by applying an adaptive scaling factor to the surprise signal, which is updated based on a moving average of the agent's recent surprise experience.

  3. Joint Optimization: The agent's policy is learned by optimizing a combination of the extrinsic (environment-provided) reward and the intrinsic reward from SAIM, using a reinforcement learning algorithm such as PPO or SAC.

The authors evaluate SAIM in several simulated environments, including a maze navigation task, a block stacking task, and a multi-room exploration task. They compare SAIM to several baseline intrinsic motivation approaches, as well as an agent trained solely on extrinsic rewards.

The results show that SAIM consistently outperforms the baselines, demonstrating more efficient exploration and higher overall learning performance. The authors also provide ablation studies and analyses to understand the importance of the various SAIM components and design choices.

Critical Analysis

The SAIM approach is a promising step forward in the field of intrinsic motivation for reinforcement learning, as it addresses some of the limitations of existing approaches. However, there are a few potential areas for improvement or further research:

  1. Scalability to more complex environments: While the authors demonstrate the effectiveness of SAIM in several simulated tasks, it remains to be seen how well the approach would scale to truly complex, high-dimensional environments. The computational and sample efficiency of the surprise estimation and reward calculation mechanisms may become a challenge in these settings.

  2. Robustness to model misspecification: The SAIM approach relies on the agent maintaining an accurate model of the environment dynamics, which may be difficult to achieve in practice, especially in complex or partially observable environments. It would be valuable to explore the sensitivity of SAIM to model errors or uncertainty.

  3. Potential for unintended behaviors: As with any intrinsic motivation approach, there is a risk that the agent may optimize for the intrinsic reward signal in ways that lead to undesirable or even harmful behaviors. The authors mention this issue and suggest using constrained optimization techniques, but more research is needed to ensure the safety and alignment of SAIM-driven agents.

  4. Comparison to other exploration methods: While the authors compare SAIM to several baseline intrinsic motivation approaches, it would be informative to also compare it to other exploration techniques, such as Innate Motivation for Robot Swarms by Minimizing Surprise, which use different principles to encourage exploration.

Overall, the SAIM approach represents an important contribution to the field of unsupervised reinforcement learning, and the authors have demonstrated its potential through rigorous experimentation. Further research to address the identified challenges and explore the broader implications of this work could lead to even more robust and effective exploration strategies for reinforcement learning agents.

Conclusion

The [Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation for Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning] paper introduces a novel intrinsic reward mechanism called "Surprise-Adaptive Intrinsic Motivation" (SAIM) that aims to encourage efficient exploration in complex environments. By adaptively adjusting the intrinsic reward signal to maintain an optimal level of surprise, SAIM helps agents strike a balance between exploration and exploitation, leading to improved learning performance compared to existing intrinsic motivation approaches.

The key ideas and insights from this work have the potential to advance the field of unsupervised reinforcement learning, enabling agents to more effectively navigate and learn in challenging environments. While the authors have demonstrated the effectiveness of SAIM in several simulated tasks, further research is needed to address potential scalability and robustness issues, as well as to explore the broader implications and safety considerations of this approach.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ‘€

Intrinsic Rewards for Exploration without Harm from Observational Noise: A Simulation Study Based on the Free Energy Principle

Theodore Jerome Tinker, Kenji Doya, Jun Tani

YC

0

Reddit

0

In Reinforcement Learning (RL), artificial agents are trained to maximize numerical rewards by performing tasks. Exploration is essential in RL because agents must discover information before exploiting it. Two rewards encouraging efficient exploration are the entropy of action policy and curiosity for information gain. Entropy is well-established in literature, promoting randomized action selection. Curiosity is defined in a broad variety of ways in literature, promoting discovery of novel experiences. One example, prediction error curiosity, rewards agents for discovering observations they cannot accurately predict. However, such agents may be distracted by unpredictable observational noises known as curiosity traps. Based on the Free Energy Principle (FEP), this paper proposes hidden state curiosity, which rewards agents by the KL divergence between the predictive prior and posterior probabilities of latent variables. We trained six types of agents to navigate mazes: baseline agents without rewards for entropy or curiosity, and agents rewarded for entropy and/or either prediction error curiosity or hidden state curiosity. We find entropy and curiosity result in efficient exploration, especially both employed together. Notably, agents with hidden state curiosity demonstrate resilience against curiosity traps, which hinder agents with prediction error curiosity. This suggests implementing the FEP may enhance the robustness and generalization of RL models, potentially aligning the learning processes of artificial and biological agents.

Read more

5/14/2024

Constrained Ensemble Exploration for Unsupervised Skill Discovery

Constrained Ensemble Exploration for Unsupervised Skill Discovery

Chenjia Bai, Rushuai Yang, Qiaosheng Zhang, Kang Xu, Yi Chen, Ting Xiao, Xuelong Li

YC

0

Reddit

0

Unsupervised Reinforcement Learning (RL) provides a promising paradigm for learning useful behaviors via reward-free per-training. Existing methods for unsupervised RL mainly conduct empowerment-driven skill discovery or entropy-based exploration. However, empowerment often leads to static skills, and pure exploration only maximizes the state coverage rather than learning useful behaviors. In this paper, we propose a novel unsupervised RL framework via an ensemble of skills, where each skill performs partition exploration based on the state prototypes. Thus, each skill can explore the clustered area locally, and the ensemble skills maximize the overall state coverage. We adopt state-distribution constraints for the skill occupancy and the desired cluster for learning distinguishable skills. Theoretical analysis is provided for the state entropy and the resulting skill distributions. Based on extensive experiments on several challenging tasks, we find our method learns well-explored ensemble skills and achieves superior performance in various downstream tasks compared to previous methods.

Read more

5/28/2024

šŸ…

Convergence of a model-free entropy-regularized inverse reinforcement learning algorithm

Titouan Renard, Andreas Schlaginhaufen, Tingting Ni, Maryam Kamgarpour

YC

0

Reddit

0

Given a dataset of expert demonstrations, inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) aims to recover a reward for which the expert is optimal. This work proposes a model-free algorithm to solve entropy-regularized IRL problem. In particular, we employ a stochastic gradient descent update for the reward and a stochastic soft policy iteration update for the policy. Assuming access to a generative model, we prove that our algorithm is guaranteed to recover a reward for which the expert is $varepsilon$-optimal using $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{2})$ samples of the Markov decision process (MDP). Furthermore, with $mathcal{O}(1/varepsilon^{4})$ samples we prove that the optimal policy corresponding to the recovered reward is $varepsilon$-close to the expert policy in total variation distance.

Read more

4/24/2024

External Model Motivated Agents: Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Environment Sampling

New!External Model Motivated Agents: Reinforcement Learning for Enhanced Environment Sampling

Rishav Bhagat, Jonathan Balloch, Zhiyu Lin, Julia Kim, Mark Riedl

YC

0

Reddit

0

Unlike reinforcement learning (RL) agents, humans remain capable multitaskers in changing environments. In spite of only experiencing the world through their own observations and interactions, people know how to balance focusing on tasks with learning about how changes may affect their understanding of the world. This is possible by choosing to solve tasks in ways that are interesting and generally informative beyond just the current task. Motivated by this, we propose an agent influence framework for RL agents to improve the adaptation efficiency of external models in changing environments without any changes to the agent's rewards. Our formulation is composed of two self-contained modules: interest fields and behavior shaping via interest fields. We implement an uncertainty-based interest field algorithm as well as a skill-sampling-based behavior-shaping algorithm to use in testing this framework. Our results show that our method outperforms the baselines in terms of external model adaptation on metrics that measure both efficiency and performance.

Read more

7/2/2024