A Survey of Defenses against AI-generated Visual Media: Detection, Disruption, and Authentication

Read original: arXiv:2407.10575 - Published 7/16/2024 by Jingyi Deng, Chenhao Lin, Zhengyu Zhao, Shuai Liu, Qian Wang, Chao Shen
Total Score

0

A Survey of Defenses against AI-generated Visual Media: Detection, Disruption, and Authentication

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of various approaches to defend against the challenges posed by AI-generated visual media, including detection, disruption, and authentication.
  • The survey covers techniques to mitigate IP infringement and discern AI-generated synthetic media.
  • The paper explores the evolving landscape of AI-powered visual media creation and the corresponding defensive strategies.

Plain English Explanation

This paper investigates the growing challenge of AI-generated visual content, such as deepfakes, and the various approaches being developed to address this issue. Deepfakes are realistic-looking images, videos, or other media that are created using AI and machine learning techniques, often to depict people saying or doing things they never actually did.

The paper examines different ways to detect when visual media has been AI-generated, as well as methods to disrupt the creation of such content and authenticate the origin of visual media. This includes techniques to identify the digital fingerprints or subtle inconsistencies that can reveal when an image or video has been artificially generated.

The research also explores ways to prevent the unauthorized use of intellectual property (IP) in AI-generated visuals, and to more broadly distinguish genuine media from synthetic content created by AI systems. These efforts aim to help individuals, businesses, and society at large navigate the evolving landscape of AI-powered visual media and mitigate the potential harms that could arise from the malicious or deceptive use of this technology.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive survey of techniques for detecting, disrupting, and authenticating AI-generated visual media. On the detection front, the authors review various approaches that analyze visual artifacts, temporal inconsistencies, and other telltale signs to identify manipulated or synthetic content.

For disruption, the paper examines techniques to interfere with the generation of deepfakes, such as adversarial training and watermarking. Authentication methods covered include the use of blockchain, digital provenance, and other approaches to verify the origin and integrity of visual media.

The survey also delves into machine learning-based techniques for more broadly distinguishing AI-generated synthetic content from genuine visual media. This includes the development of datasets and benchmarks to drive progress in this area.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-researched overview of the current state of the art in defending against AI-generated visual media. However, the authors acknowledge that many of the proposed techniques are still in the early stages of development and face significant challenges.

For example, detection methods may struggle to keep pace with the rapid advancements in AI-powered media generation, and disruption approaches could potentially be circumvented by increasingly sophisticated deepfake creation techniques. The authentication and verification methods discussed also rely on the adoption of new standards and protocols, which may face barriers to widespread implementation.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the societal and ethical implications of these technologies, such as the potential for abuse, the impact on trust and truth, and the broader implications for privacy and security. Further research and discussion in these areas would be valuable to provide a more holistic understanding of the challenges and tradeoffs involved.

Conclusion

This paper presents a comprehensive survey of the current state of defenses against AI-generated visual media, covering detection, disruption, and authentication approaches. The research highlights the evolving technological landscape and the ongoing efforts to mitigate the risks posed by malicious or deceptive use of these powerful AI capabilities.

While the techniques discussed show promise, the authors acknowledge the significant challenges that remain, including the need to keep pace with rapidly advancing generative AI models and the complexities of implementing robust verification and authentication systems. Addressing these issues will require continued innovation, collaboration, and a deeper understanding of the broader societal implications of this technology.

As AI-powered visual media continues to advance, the development of effective countermeasures will be crucial to maintain trust, protect intellectual property, and ensure the responsible use of these powerful tools. This survey provides a valuable resource for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners working to navigate this evolving landscape and shape the future of visual media in the age of AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

A Survey of Defenses against AI-generated Visual Media: Detection, Disruption, and Authentication
Total Score

0

A Survey of Defenses against AI-generated Visual Media: Detection, Disruption, and Authentication

Jingyi Deng, Chenhao Lin, Zhengyu Zhao, Shuai Liu, Qian Wang, Chao Shen

Deep generative models have demonstrated impressive performance in various computer vision applications, including image synthesis, video generation, and medical analysis. Despite their significant advancements, these models may be used for malicious purposes, such as misinformation, deception, and copyright violation. In this paper, we provide a systematic and timely review of research efforts on defenses against AI-generated visual media, covering detection, disruption, and authentication. We review existing methods and summarize the mainstream defense-related tasks within a unified passive and proactive framework. Moreover, we survey the derivative tasks concerning the trustworthiness of defenses, such as their robustness and fairness. For each task, we formulate its general pipeline and propose a taxonomy based on methodological strategies that are uniformly applicable to the primary subtasks. Additionally, we summarize the commonly used evaluation datasets, criteria, and metrics. Finally, by analyzing the reviewed studies, we provide insights into current research challenges and suggest possible directions for future research.

Read more

7/16/2024

An Analysis of Recent Advances in Deepfake Image Detection in an Evolving Threat Landscape
Total Score

0

An Analysis of Recent Advances in Deepfake Image Detection in an Evolving Threat Landscape

Sifat Muhammad Abdullah, Aravind Cheruvu, Shravya Kanchi, Taejoong Chung, Peng Gao, Murtuza Jadliwala, Bimal Viswanath

Deepfake or synthetic images produced using deep generative models pose serious risks to online platforms. This has triggered several research efforts to accurately detect deepfake images, achieving excellent performance on publicly available deepfake datasets. In this work, we study 8 state-of-the-art detectors and argue that they are far from being ready for deployment due to two recent developments. First, the emergence of lightweight methods to customize large generative models, can enable an attacker to create many customized generators (to create deepfakes), thereby substantially increasing the threat surface. We show that existing defenses fail to generalize well to such emph{user-customized generative models} that are publicly available today. We discuss new machine learning approaches based on content-agnostic features, and ensemble modeling to improve generalization performance against user-customized models. Second, the emergence of textit{vision foundation models} -- machine learning models trained on broad data that can be easily adapted to several downstream tasks -- can be misused by attackers to craft adversarial deepfakes that can evade existing defenses. We propose a simple adversarial attack that leverages existing foundation models to craft adversarial samples textit{without adding any adversarial noise}, through careful semantic manipulation of the image content. We highlight the vulnerabilities of several defenses against our attack, and explore directions leveraging advanced foundation models and adversarial training to defend against this new threat.

Read more

4/26/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

The Tug-of-War Between Deepfake Generation and Detection

Hannah Lee, Changyeon Lee, Kevin Farhat, Lin Qiu, Steve Geluso, Aerin Kim, Oren Etzioni

Multimodal generative models are rapidly evolving, leading to a surge in the generation of realistic video and audio that offers exciting possibilities but also serious risks. Deepfake videos, which can convincingly impersonate individuals, have particularly garnered attention due to their potential misuse in spreading misinformation and creating fraudulent content. This survey paper examines the dual landscape of deepfake video generation and detection, emphasizing the need for effective countermeasures against potential abuses. We provide a comprehensive overview of current deepfake generation techniques, including face swapping, reenactment, and audio-driven animation, which leverage cutting-edge technologies like GANs and diffusion models to produce highly realistic fake videos. Additionally, we analyze various detection approaches designed to differentiate authentic from altered videos, from detecting visual artifacts to deploying advanced algorithms that pinpoint inconsistencies across video and audio signals. The effectiveness of these detection methods heavily relies on the diversity and quality of datasets used for training and evaluation. We discuss the evolution of deepfake datasets, highlighting the importance of robust, diverse, and frequently updated collections to enhance the detection accuracy and generalizability. As deepfakes become increasingly indistinguishable from authentic content, developing advanced detection techniques that can keep pace with generation technologies is crucial. We advocate for a proactive approach in the tug-of-war between deepfake creators and detectors, emphasizing the need for continuous research collaboration, standardization of evaluation metrics, and the creation of comprehensive benchmarks.

Read more

8/22/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking

Yuying Li, Zeyan Liu, Junyi Zhao, Liangqin Ren, Fengjun Li, Jiebo Luo, Bo Luo

Generative AI models can produce high-quality images based on text prompts. The generated images often appear indistinguishable from images generated by conventional optical photography devices or created by human artists (i.e., real images). While the outstanding performance of such generative models is generally well received, security concerns arise. For instance, such image generators could be used to facilitate fraud or scam schemes, generate and spread misinformation, or produce fabricated artworks. In this paper, we present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. First, we collect and share a dataset of real images and their corresponding artificial counterparts generated by four popular AI image generators. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures. This dataset can be used as a foundation to support future research on adversarial AI-art. Next, we present a user study that employs the ARIA dataset to evaluate if real-world users can distinguish with or without reference images. In a benchmarking study, we further evaluate if state-of-the-art open-source and commercial AI image detectors can effectively identify the images in the ARIA dataset. Finally, we present a ResNet-50 classifier and evaluate its accuracy and transferability on the ARIA dataset.

Read more

4/24/2024