A Survey on the Real Power of ChatGPT
2405.00704
3
0
🌀
Abstract
ChatGPT has changed the AI community and an active research line is the performance evaluation of ChatGPT. A key challenge for the evaluation is that ChatGPT is still closed-source and traditional benchmark datasets may have been used by ChatGPT as the training data. In this paper, (i) we survey recent studies which uncover the real performance levels of ChatGPT in seven categories of NLP tasks, (ii) review the social implications and safety issues of ChatGPT, and (iii) emphasize key challenges and opportunities for its evaluation. We hope our survey can shed some light on its blackbox manner, so that researchers are not misleaded by its surface generation.
Get summaries of the top AI research delivered straight to your inbox:
Overview
- The paper surveys recent studies that have uncovered the real performance levels of ChatGPT, a widely-discussed AI language model, across seven categories of natural language processing (NLP) tasks.
- It also reviews the social implications and safety issues of ChatGPT and emphasizes key challenges and opportunities for its evaluation.
- The authors hope to shed light on the "blackbox" nature of ChatGPT, so that researchers are not misled by its surface-level generation capabilities.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on evaluating the performance of ChatGPT, a highly capable AI language model that has generated significant interest in the AI community. Since ChatGPT is still a closed-source system, the authors note that traditional benchmark datasets may have been used in its training, which can make it challenging to accurately assess its true capabilities.
To address this, the paper surveys recent studies that have delved deeper into ChatGPT's performance across a range of NLP tasks, including code generation, algorithmic reasoning, invention tasks, and providing advice. The paper also examines the social implications and safety concerns surrounding ChatGPT.
The authors aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of ChatGPT research, highlighting both its strengths and limitations, in order to help researchers better understand its capabilities and limitations.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a thorough review of recent studies that have evaluated the performance of ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language model developed by OpenAI. Since ChatGPT is a closed-source system, the researchers note that traditional benchmark datasets may have been used in its training, which can introduce bias and make it challenging to accurately assess its true capabilities.
To address this, the paper surveys a range of recent studies that have conducted in-depth evaluations of ChatGPT's performance across seven different categories of NLP tasks. These include code generation, algorithmic reasoning, invention tasks, and providing advice, among others. The researchers also review the social implications and safety concerns associated with the widespread adoption of ChatGPT.
The key insights from this survey include a more nuanced understanding of ChatGPT's strengths and limitations, as well as the identification of critical challenges and opportunities for its ongoing evaluation and development.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable and comprehensive overview of the current state of ChatGPT research, highlighting both the impressive capabilities of the model as well as the significant challenges in accurately evaluating its performance.
One of the key limitations noted in the paper is the closed-source nature of ChatGPT, which makes it difficult to fully understand the model's training data and architecture. This can introduce biases and make it challenging to compare ChatGPT's performance to other language models or benchmark datasets.
The paper also raises important concerns about the social implications and safety issues associated with the widespread adoption of a powerful AI system like ChatGPT. These include the potential for misinformation, the impact on various industries and professions, and the ethical considerations around the use of such technology.
While the paper does an excellent job of summarizing the current research, it would be helpful to see the authors offer their own insights or criticisms of the existing studies. Additionally, the paper could benefit from a more in-depth discussion of the potential avenues for further research and evaluation of ChatGPT and other large language models.
Conclusion
The paper provides a comprehensive survey of recent research on the performance and implications of ChatGPT, a highly capable AI language model that has generated significant interest and discussion in the AI community.
The key takeaways from the paper include a more nuanced understanding of ChatGPT's strengths and limitations across a range of NLP tasks, as well as the identification of critical challenges and opportunities for its ongoing evaluation and development.
The authors' emphasis on the "blackbox" nature of ChatGPT and the potential for researchers to be misled by its surface-level generation capabilities is particularly insightful. By shedding light on these issues, the paper aims to help the research community develop more robust and reliable methods for evaluating the performance of large language models like ChatGPT.
Overall, this paper provides a valuable resource for anyone interested in the current state of ChatGPT research and the broader implications of this transformative technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
ChatGPT Is Here to Help, Not to Replace Anybody -- An Evaluation of Students' Opinions On Integrating ChatGPT In CS Courses
Bruno Pereira Cipriano, Pedro Alves
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT and Bard are capable of producing code based on textual descriptions, with remarkable efficacy. Such technology will have profound implications for computing education, raising concerns about cheating, excessive dependence, and a decline in computational thinking skills, among others. There has been extensive research on how teachers should handle this challenge but it is also important to understand how students feel about this paradigm shift. In this research, 52 first-year CS students were surveyed in order to assess their views on technologies with code-generation capabilities, both from academic and professional perspectives. Our findings indicate that while students generally favor the academic use of GPT, they don't over rely on it, only mildly asking for its help. Although most students benefit from GPT, some struggle to use it effectively, urging the need for specific GPT training. Opinions on GPT's impact on their professional lives vary, but there is a consensus on its importance in academic practice.
4/29/2024
🛸
Evaluation of ChatGPT Usability as A Code Generation Tool
Tanha Miah, Hong Zhu
0
0
With the rapid advance of machine learning (ML) technology, large language models (LLMs) are increasingly explored as an intelligent tool to generate program code from natural language specifications. However, existing evaluations of LLMs have focused on their capabilities in comparison with humans. It is desirable to evaluate their usability when deciding on whether to use a LLM in software production. This paper proposes a user centric method. It includes metadata in the test cases of a benchmark to describe their usages, conducts testing in a multi-attempt process that mimic the uses of LLMs, measures LLM generated solutions on a set of quality attributes that reflect usability, and evaluates the performance based on user experiences in the uses of LLMs as a tool. The paper reports an application of the method in the evaluation of ChatGPT usability as a code generation tool for the R programming language. Our experiments demonstrated that ChatGPT is highly useful for generating R program code although it may fail on hard programming tasks. The user experiences are good with overall average number of attempts being 1.61 and the average time of completion being 47.02 seconds. Our experiments also found that the weakest aspect of usability is conciseness, which has a score of 3.80 out of 5. Our experiment also shows that it is hard for human developers to learn from experiences to improve the skill of using ChatGPT to generate code.
4/10/2024
Benchmarking ChatGPT on Algorithmic Reasoning
Sean McLeish, Avi Schwarzschild, Tom Goldstein
0
0
We evaluate ChatGPT's ability to solve algorithm problems from the CLRS benchmark suite that is designed for GNNs. The benchmark requires the use of a specified classical algorithm to solve a given problem. We find that ChatGPT outperforms specialist GNN models, using Python to successfully solve these problems. This raises new points in the discussion about learning algorithms with neural networks.
4/5/2024
👨🏫
The high dimensional psychological profile and cultural bias of ChatGPT
Hang Yuan (Sun Yat-Sen University), Zhongyue Che (Sun Yat-Sen University), Shao Li (Sun Yat-Sen University), Yue Zhang (Renmin University of China), Xiaomeng Hu (Renmin University of China), Siyang Luo (Sun Yat-Sen University)
0
0
Given the rapid advancement of large-scale language models, artificial intelligence (AI) models, like ChatGPT, are playing an increasingly prominent role in human society. However, to ensure that artificial intelligence models benefit human society, we must first fully understand the similarities and differences between the human-like characteristics exhibited by artificial intelligence models and real humans, as well as the cultural stereotypes and biases that artificial intelligence models may exhibit in the process of interacting with humans. This study first measured ChatGPT in 84 dimensions of psychological characteristics, revealing differences between ChatGPT and human norms in most dimensions as well as in high-dimensional psychological representations. Additionally, through the measurement of ChatGPT in 13 dimensions of cultural values, it was revealed that ChatGPT's cultural value patterns are dissimilar to those of various countries/regions worldwide. Finally, an analysis of ChatGPT's performance in eight decision-making tasks involving interactions with humans from different countries/regions revealed that ChatGPT exhibits clear cultural stereotypes in most decision-making tasks and shows significant cultural bias in third-party punishment and ultimatum games. The findings indicate that, compared to humans, ChatGPT exhibits a distinct psychological profile and cultural value orientation, and it also shows cultural biases and stereotypes in interpersonal decision-making. Future research endeavors should emphasize enhanced technical oversight and augmented transparency in the database and algorithmic training procedures to foster more efficient cross-cultural communication and mitigate social disparities.
5/7/2024