A survey to measure cognitive biases influencing mobility choices

Overview

• This paper describes a survey on perceptions and preferences for different transportation modes, including cars, buses, bicycles, and walking.
• The survey gathered 650 responses in 2023 and the data is published as open data.
• The researchers analyze the survey results to understand how cognitive biases, such as halo bias, choice-supportive bias, and reactance, influence mobility decisions.
• The findings aim to provide a basis for simulating mobility decisions in a virtual town and designing a simulation-based serious game for urban managers.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers conducted a survey to understand how people perceive and choose different ways to get around, such as driving cars, taking buses, riding bicycles, and walking. They gathered 650 responses in 2023 and made the data publicly available.

The researchers then analyzed the survey results to see how certain psychological biases might affect people's transportation choices. For example, the "halo bias" is when we tend to have a generally positive or negative impression of something, which can influence our decisions. The "choice-supportive bias" is when we tend to favor the option we've already chosen, even if it's not the best one. And "reactance" is when we resist being told what to do, even if it's for our own good.

The researchers believe these biases help explain why people often stick to driving cars, even when cities try to encourage more sustainable modes of transportation like walking and cycling. By understanding these biases, the researchers hope to create a computer simulation that can model how people make transportation decisions in a virtual town.

This simulation could then be used as the basis for a "serious game," where urban planners and managers can experiment with different policies and see how they affect people's transportation choices. This could help cities become more sustainable and livable.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a survey to gather data on the perceptions and preferences of users across four mobility modes: cars, buses, bicycles, and walking. The survey collected 650 responses in 2023 and the data has been published as open data.

The researchers analyzed the survey results to investigate the influence of three cognitive biases on mobility decisions: halo bias, choice-supportive bias, and reactance. These biases are proposed as plausible explanations for the observed behavior, where the population tends to favor private cars despite urban policies aimed at promoting more sustainable soft mobility options.

The gathered data and the proposed model can serve as the basis for simulating mobility decisions in a virtual town. This simulation can then be used to design a simulation-based serious game where the player takes on the role of an urban manager faced with planning choices to make their city more sustainable.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the cognitive biases that influence transportation choices, but it does not address the potential limitations of the survey methodology or the generalizability of the findings. The researchers acknowledge that further research is needed to validate the model and test its applicability in different urban contexts.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the ethical considerations or potential unintended consequences of using a simulation-based serious game to inform urban planning decisions. It would be important to consider how such a game might be designed to promote inclusive and equitable transportation solutions, rather than reinforcing existing biases or prioritizing certain stakeholder interests over others.

The researchers could also explore how the influence of driving context on lateral driving style might interact with the cognitive biases identified in this study, further shaping transportation choices and behaviors.

Conclusion

This paper provides a valuable exploration of how cognitive biases, such as halo bias, choice-supportive bias, and reactance, can influence people's transportation decisions. By understanding these biases, the researchers aim to develop a simulation-based serious game that can help urban managers plan more sustainable and livable cities.

The open-source data and the proposed model offer a promising foundation for further research and practical applications in the field of transportation planning and urban design. However, the researchers should also consider the ethical and practical challenges of implementing such a simulation-based approach, to ensure that it promotes equitable and inclusive mobility solutions.