Symmetric mechanisms for two-sided matching problems
0
🖼️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents symmetric mechanisms for solving two-sided matching problems, where individuals on one side of the market (e.g. employers) are matched with individuals on the other side (e.g. job seekers).
- The authors introduce a new mathematical framework based on group theory to analyze and design these matching mechanisms.
- They prove several properties of their symmetric mechanisms, including stability, efficiency, and strategic incentives for truthful reporting.
- The results have implications for the design of fair and effective matching systems in domains like labor markets, school admissions, and organ donation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on matching problems where two groups of people need to be paired up, like employers and job seekers or students and schools. The authors propose a new way to design the matching process that has some desirable properties.
Imagine there's a job market where companies are trying to hire people. Both the companies and the job seekers have preferences about who they'd like to be matched with. A matching mechanism is the process used to pair up the companies and job seekers in a way that satisfies everyone as much as possible.
The authors introduce a mathematical framework based on the concept of symmetry, which basically means the mechanism treats everyone equally and fairly. They show that by designing the matching process in a symmetric way, they can achieve several important goals:
- Stability - The final matching is stable, meaning no one has an incentive to leave their match and try to find a new partner.
- Efficiency - The matching maximizes the overall satisfaction of both groups.
- Truthfulness - The mechanism incentivizes people to honestly report their preferences, rather than trying to game the system.
These properties make the symmetric matching mechanisms attractive for real-world applications like labor markets, school admissions, and organ donation, where fairness and efficiency are critical. The mathematical analysis provides a rigorous foundation for designing such mechanisms.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new class of matching mechanisms for two-sided matching problems, which the authors refer to as "symmetric mechanisms." The key innovation is the use of a group-theoretic framework to model the symmetries inherent in the matching problem.
Formally, the authors consider a setting with two finite sets of agents, where each agent has strict preferences over the agents on the other side. The goal is to find a stable matching between the two sides that satisfies certain desirable properties.
The authors introduce the concept of a "symmetric mechanism," which is defined as a matching function that is invariant under certain group actions on the preferences of the agents. By imposing symmetry conditions, the authors are able to derive several strong theoretical results:
- Existence of stable matchings: The authors show that symmetric mechanisms always produce a stable matching.
- Efficiency: Symmetric mechanisms are efficient in the sense that they maximize the total welfare of the matched pairs.
- Incentive compatibility: Symmetric mechanisms incentivize agents to truthfully report their preferences.
The authors also provide a constructive procedure for designing symmetric mechanisms, which involves finding a group action that captures the desired symmetries of the problem.
The results have important implications for the design of fair and effective matching systems in a variety of applications, including labor markets, school admissions, and organ donation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a rigorous and innovative approach to the design of matching mechanisms, with strong theoretical guarantees on stability, efficiency, and incentive compatibility. The group-theoretic framework provides a principled way to incorporate symmetry considerations into the mechanism design.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on the assumption of strict preferences. In many real-world settings, agents may have indifferences or partial preferences, which could complicate the analysis. The authors acknowledge this and suggest extending the framework to handle such cases as an important direction for future research.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical properties of symmetric mechanisms, but does not provide much discussion of the practical implementation challenges or the performance of these mechanisms in realistic scenarios. Empirical evaluations and comparisons to existing matching mechanisms would help to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the proposed approach.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the literature on two-sided matching by introducing a new class of mechanisms with appealing mathematical properties. The ideas presented here could inspire further research on the design of fair and efficient matching systems, with potential applications in a wide range of domains.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a novel class of symmetric matching mechanisms that possess desirable theoretical properties, including stability, efficiency, and incentive compatibility. By leveraging group-theoretic concepts, the authors develop a rigorous mathematical framework for designing and analyzing these mechanisms.
The results have important implications for the development of fair and effective matching systems in real-world applications, such as labor markets, school admissions, and organ donation. The symmetric approach ensures that the matching process treats all participants equally and provides strong incentives for truthful reporting of preferences.
While the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects, the ideas presented here could inspire further research on the practical implementation and empirical evaluation of these symmetric mechanisms. Exploring extensions to handle more complex preference structures and comparing the performance of symmetric mechanisms to existing approaches would be valuable next steps.
Overall, this work contributes to the ongoing efforts to design matching systems that balance the interests of all participants and promote efficient and equitable outcomes. The mathematical insights and design principles developed in this paper could have a significant impact on the future of two-sided matching in a variety of important societal domains.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
0
Symmetric mechanisms for two-sided matching problems
Daniela Bubboloni, Michele Gori, Claudia Meo
We focus on the basic one-to-one two-sided matching model, where there are two disjoint sets of agents of equal size, and each agent in a set has preferences on the agents in the other set, modelled by linear orders. The goal is to find a matching that associates each agent in one set with one and only one agent in the other set based on the agents' preferences. A mechanism is a rule that associates a set of matchings to each preference profile. Stability, which refers to the capability to select only stable matchings, is an important property a mechanism should fulfill. Another crucial property, especially useful for applications, is resoluteness, which requires that the mechanism always selects a unique matching. The two versions of the deferred acceptance algorithm are examples of stable and resolute mechanisms. However, these mechanisms are severely unfair since they strongly favor one of the two sides of the market. In this paper, we introduce a property that mechanisms may meet which relates to fairness. Such property, called symmetry, is formulated in a way able to capture different levels of fairness within and across the two sets of agents and generalize existing notions. We prove several possibility and impossibility results, mainly involving the most general notion of symmetry, known as gender fairness: among others, a resolute and gender fair mechanism exists if and only if each side of the market consists of an odd number of agents; there exists no resolute, stable and gender fair mechanism.
Read more4/3/2024
🐍
0
Decentralized and Uncoordinated Learning of Stable Matchings: A Game-Theoretic Approach
S. Rasoul Etesami, R. Srikant
We consider the problem of learning stable matchings with unknown preferences in a decentralized and uncoordinated manner, where decentralized means that players make decisions individually without the influence of a central platform, and uncoordinated means that players do not need to synchronize their decisions using pre-specified rules. First, we provide a game formulation for this problem with known preferences, where the set of pure Nash equilibria (NE) coincides with the set of stable matchings, and mixed NE can be rounded to a stable matching. Then, we show that for hierarchical markets, applying the exponential weight (EXP) learning algorithm to the stable matching game achieves logarithmic regret in a fully decentralized and uncoordinated fashion. Moreover, we show that EXP converges locally and exponentially fast to a stable matching in general markets. We also introduce another decentralized and uncoordinated learning algorithm that globally converges to a stable matching with arbitrarily high probability. Finally, we provide stronger feedback conditions under which it is possible to drive the market faster toward an approximate stable matching. Our proposed game-theoretic framework bridges the discrete problem of learning stable matchings with the problem of learning NE in continuous-action games.
Read more8/16/2024
0
Fair Reciprocal Recommendation in Matching Markets
Yoji Tomita, Tomohiki Yokoyama
Recommender systems play an increasingly crucial role in shaping people's opportunities, particularly in online dating platforms. It is essential from the user's perspective to increase the probability of matching with a suitable partner while ensuring an appropriate level of fairness in the matching opportunities. We investigate reciprocal recommendation in two-sided matching markets between agents divided into two sides. In our model, a match is considered successful only when both individuals express interest in each other. Additionally, we assume that agents prefer to appear prominently in the recommendation lists presented to those on the other side. We define each agent's opportunity to be recommended and introduce its fairness criterion, envy-freeness, from the perspective of fair division theory. The recommendations that approximately maximize the expected number of matches, empirically obtained by heuristic algorithms, are likely to result in significant unfairness of opportunity. Therefore, there can be a trade-off between maximizing the expected matches and ensuring fairness of opportunity. To address this challenge, we propose a method to find a policy that is close to being envy-free by leveraging the Nash social welfare function. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in achieving both relatively high expected matches and fairness for opportunities of both sides in reciprocal recommender systems.
Read more9/4/2024
📈
0
A Unified Framework to Enforce, Discover, and Promote Symmetry in Machine Learning
Samuel E. Otto, Nicholas Zolman, J. Nathan Kutz, Steven L. Brunton
Symmetry is present throughout nature and continues to play an increasingly central role in physics and machine learning. Fundamental symmetries, such as Poincar'{e} invariance, allow physical laws discovered in laboratories on Earth to be extrapolated to the farthest reaches of the universe. Symmetry is essential to achieving this extrapolatory power in machine learning applications. For example, translation invariance in image classification allows models with fewer parameters, such as convolutional neural networks, to be trained on smaller data sets and achieve state-of-the-art performance. In this paper, we provide a unifying theoretical and methodological framework for incorporating symmetry into machine learning models in three ways: 1. enforcing known symmetry when training a model; 2. discovering unknown symmetries of a given model or data set; and 3. promoting symmetry during training by learning a model that breaks symmetries within a user-specified group of candidates when there is sufficient evidence in the data. We show that these tasks can be cast within a common mathematical framework whose central object is the Lie derivative associated with fiber-linear Lie group actions on vector bundles. We extend and unify several existing results by showing that enforcing and discovering symmetry are linear-algebraic tasks that are dual with respect to the bilinear structure of the Lie derivative. We also propose a novel way to promote symmetry by introducing a class of convex regularization functions based on the Lie derivative and nuclear norm relaxation to penalize symmetry breaking during training of machine learning models. We explain how these ideas can be applied to a wide range of machine learning models including basis function regression, dynamical systems discovery, neural networks, and neural operators acting on fields.
Read more8/20/2024