Fair Reciprocal Recommendation in Matching Markets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines fair reciprocal recommendation in matching markets
- Proposes a model for fair recommendation in two-sided markets
- Considers tradeoffs between accuracy, fairness, and reciprocity
Plain English Explanation
In two-sided matching markets, individuals or entities on one side (e.g., job seekers) are matched with those on the other side (e.g., employers). This paper looks at how to make the recommendations in these markets fair and reciprocal.
The key idea is to balance the accuracy of the recommendations with fairness to both sides and the reciprocal nature of the recommendations. For example, in a job market, a recommendation system should suggest good matches for both job seekers and employers, and those recommendations should be fair - not biased towards one side. Additionally, the recommendations should be reciprocal, meaning if an employer recommends a job seeker, that job seeker should also be likely to recommend the employer.
The paper proposes a model that tries to achieve this balance, taking into account the unique characteristics of two-sided matching markets. The model aims to ensure that the recommendations are accurate, fair to both sides, and reciprocal in nature.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a reciprocal recommender system (RRS) for two-sided matching markets. The system considers fairness and reciprocity in addition to accuracy when making recommendations.
The authors formulate the problem as an optimization task, where the goal is to maximize recommendation accuracy while ensuring fairness and reciprocity. They define fairness in terms of envy-freeness, where no user on either side prefers another's recommendation. Reciprocity is achieved by enforcing that if user A recommends user B, then user B is also likely to recommend user A.
The authors propose an algorithm to solve this optimization problem. It iteratively updates the recommendation scores, balancing the objectives of accuracy, fairness, and reciprocity. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach can achieve more fair and reciprocal recommendations compared to baselines, with only a small loss in accuracy.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thoughtful approach to fair recommendation in two-sided markets. By considering fairness and reciprocity alongside accuracy, the model aims to make recommendations that are more equitable and mutually beneficial for both sides.
One potential limitation is the computational complexity of the proposed algorithm, which may make it challenging to scale to very large markets. The authors mention that further research is needed to improve the efficiency of the optimization process.
Additionally, the paper does not address how the system would handle dynamic changes in user preferences or market conditions. In real-world matching markets, users' needs and the supply-demand balance can shift over time, which may require adaptations to the recommendation model.
Overall, the paper presents an interesting and relevant approach to the important problem of fair and reciprocal recommendation in matching markets. Further research to address the scalability and adaptability of the model could help enhance its real-world applicability.
Conclusion
This paper proposes a reciprocal recommender system for two-sided matching markets that aims to balance accuracy, fairness, and reciprocity in the recommendations. By considering the unique characteristics of these markets, the model can generate recommendations that are more equitable and mutually beneficial for both sides. While the computational complexity and adaptability of the approach merit further exploration, the work represents an important step towards fair and transparent recommendation systems in complex, two-sided environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Fair Reciprocal Recommendation in Matching Markets
Yoji Tomita, Tomohiki Yokoyama
Recommender systems play an increasingly crucial role in shaping people's opportunities, particularly in online dating platforms. It is essential from the user's perspective to increase the probability of matching with a suitable partner while ensuring an appropriate level of fairness in the matching opportunities. We investigate reciprocal recommendation in two-sided matching markets between agents divided into two sides. In our model, a match is considered successful only when both individuals express interest in each other. Additionally, we assume that agents prefer to appear prominently in the recommendation lists presented to those on the other side. We define each agent's opportunity to be recommended and introduce its fairness criterion, envy-freeness, from the perspective of fair division theory. The recommendations that approximately maximize the expected number of matches, empirically obtained by heuristic algorithms, are likely to result in significant unfairness of opportunity. Therefore, there can be a trade-off between maximizing the expected matches and ensuring fairness of opportunity. To address this challenge, we propose a method to find a policy that is close to being envy-free by leveraging the Nash social welfare function. Experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in achieving both relatively high expected matches and fairness for opportunities of both sides in reciprocal recommender systems.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Interpolating Item and User Fairness in Multi-Sided Recommendations
Qinyi Chen, Jason Cheuk Nam Liang, Negin Golrezaei, Djallel Bouneffouf
Today's online platforms heavily lean on algorithmic recommendations for bolstering user engagement and driving revenue. However, these recommendations can impact multiple stakeholders simultaneously -- the platform, items (sellers), and users (customers) -- each with their unique objectives, making it difficult to find the right middle ground that accommodates all stakeholders. To address this, we introduce a novel fair recommendation framework, Problem (FAIR), that flexibly balances multi-stakeholder interests via a constrained optimization formulation. We next explore Problem (FAIR) in a dynamic online setting where data uncertainty further adds complexity, and propose a low-regret algorithm FORM that concurrently performs real-time learning and fair recommendations, two tasks that are often at odds. Via both theoretical analysis and a numerical case study on real-world data, we demonstrate the efficacy of our framework and method in maintaining platform revenue while ensuring desired levels of fairness for both items and users.
Read more5/28/2024
🌿
0
Incentive-Aware Recommender Systems in Two-Sided Markets
Xiaowu Dai, Wenlu Xu, Yuan Qi, Michael I. Jordan
Online platforms in the Internet Economy commonly incorporate recommender systems that recommend products (or arms) to users (or agents). A key challenge in this domain arises from myopic agents who are naturally incentivized to exploit by choosing the optimal arm based on current information, rather than exploring various alternatives to gather information that benefits the collective. We propose a novel recommender system that aligns with agents' incentives while achieving asymptotically optimal performance, as measured by regret in repeated interactions. Our framework models this incentive-aware system as a multi-agent bandit problem in two-sided markets, where the interactions of agents and arms are facilitated by recommender systems on online platforms. This model incorporates incentive constraints induced by agents' opportunity costs. In scenarios where opportunity costs are known to the platform, we show the existence of an incentive-compatible recommendation algorithm. This algorithm pools recommendations between a genuinely good arm and an unknown arm using a randomized and adaptive strategy. Moreover, when these opportunity costs are unknown, we introduce an algorithm that randomly pools recommendations across all arms, utilizing the cumulative loss from each arm as feedback for strategic exploration. We demonstrate that both algorithms satisfy an ex-post fairness criterion, which protects agents from over-exploitation. All code for using the proposed algorithms and reproducing results is made available on GitHub.
Read more6/19/2024
0
How Fair is Your Diffusion Recommender Model?
Daniele Malitesta, Giacomo Medda, Erasmo Purificato, Ludovico Boratto, Fragkiskos D. Malliaros, Mirko Marras, Ernesto William De Luca
Diffusion-based recommender systems have recently proven to outperform traditional generative recommendation approaches, such as variational autoencoders and generative adversarial networks. Nevertheless, the machine learning literature has raised several concerns regarding the possibility that diffusion models, while learning the distribution of data samples, may inadvertently carry information bias and lead to unfair outcomes. In light of this aspect, and considering the relevance that fairness has held in recommendations over the last few decades, we conduct one of the first fairness investigations in the literature on DiffRec, a pioneer approach in diffusion-based recommendation. First, we propose an experimental setting involving DiffRec (and its variant L-DiffRec) along with nine state-of-the-art recommendation models, two popular recommendation datasets from the fairness-aware literature, and six metrics accounting for accuracy and consumer/provider fairness. Then, we perform a twofold analysis, one assessing models' performance under accuracy and recommendation fairness separately, and the other identifying if and to what extent such metrics can strike a performance trade-off. Experimental results from both studies confirm the initial unfairness warnings but pave the way for how to address them in future research directions.
Read more9/9/2024