Tackling the Local Bias in Federated Graph Learning
0
📉
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Federated graph learning (FGL) is a research area that aims to address the challenges of large-scale, distributed graph data.
- In FGL, a global graph is divided across different clients, each holding a subgraph.
- Existing FGL methods often struggle to effectively use cross-client edges, losing structural information during training.
- Local graphs in FGL can also exhibit significant distribution divergence, leading to a "local bias problem" where local models perform worse than in centralized settings.
Plain English Explanation
Federated graph learning (FGL) is a way to work with large, distributed graph-structured data. Instead of having all the data in one central location, the graph is split up and stored across different "clients" or devices. This allows the data to be processed and analyzed in a more distributed and scalable way.
However, the FGL process has some challenges. Existing methods often fail to fully utilize the connections (or "edges") between the different parts of the graph that are stored on different clients. This means they lose important structural information about the overall graph during training.
Additionally, the local graphs on each client can be quite different from each other, a problem known as "local bias." This means the models trained on the individual clients may not perform as well as a model trained on all the data centrally.
Technical Explanation
To address these issues, the researchers propose a novel FGL framework that aims to make the local models more similar to a centralized model. They design a distributed learning scheme that better leverages the cross-client edges to aggregate information from other clients.
They also introduce a "label-guided sampling" approach to help balance the imbalanced local data and reduce the training overhead. Experiments show that local bias can indeed compromise model performance and slow down training convergence.
The results verify that the proposed framework successfully mitigates local bias, achieving better performance than other baselines with lower time and memory requirements.
Critical Analysis
The paper identifies important challenges in FGL and presents a promising approach to address them. The use of cross-client edge information and label-guided sampling are sensible techniques to explore.
However, the evaluation is limited to a few datasets and tasks. It would be valuable to see how the framework performs on a wider range of real-world FGL scenarios, including larger graphs and more heterogeneous client data distributions.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential privacy or security implications of the federated learning setup, which is an important consideration for practical deployment. Further research could investigate these aspects.
Conclusion
This paper tackles the critical problem of local bias in federated graph learning. By developing techniques to better leverage cross-client connections and balance local data, the proposed framework helps overcome limitations of existing FGL methods. The findings demonstrate the importance of addressing structural and distributional challenges in distributed graph learning, paving the way for more robust and scalable FGL applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📉
0
Tackling the Local Bias in Federated Graph Learning
Binchi Zhang, Minnan Luo, Shangbin Feng, Ziqi Liu, Jun Zhou, Qinghua Zheng
Federated graph learning (FGL) has become an important research topic in response to the increasing scale and the distributed nature of graph-structured data in the real world. In FGL, a global graph is distributed across different clients, where each client holds a subgraph. Existing FGL methods often fail to effectively utilize cross-client edges, losing structural information during the training; additionally, local graphs often exhibit significant distribution divergence. These two issues make local models in FGL less desirable than in centralized graph learning, namely the local bias problem in this paper. To solve this problem, we propose a novel FGL framework to make the local models similar to the model trained in a centralized setting. Specifically, we design a distributed learning scheme, fully leveraging cross-client edges to aggregate information from other clients. In addition, we propose a label-guided sampling approach to alleviate the imbalanced local data and meanwhile, distinctly reduce the training overhead. Extensive experiments demonstrate that local bias can compromise the model performance and slow down the convergence during training. Experimental results also verify that our framework successfully mitigates local bias, achieving better performance than other baselines with lower time and memory overhead.
Read more8/27/2024
0
SpreadFGL: Edge-Client Collaborative Federated Graph Learning with Adaptive Neighbor Generation
Luying Zhong, Yueyang Pi, Zheyi Chen, Zhengxin Yu, Wang Miao, Xing Chen, Geyong Min
Federated Graph Learning (FGL) has garnered widespread attention by enabling collaborative training on multiple clients for semi-supervised classification tasks. However, most existing FGL studies do not well consider the missing inter-client topology information in real-world scenarios, causing insufficient feature aggregation of multi-hop neighbor clients during model training. Moreover, the classic FGL commonly adopts the FedAvg but neglects the high training costs when the number of clients expands, resulting in the overload of a single edge server. To address these important challenges, we propose a novel FGL framework, named SpreadFGL, to promote the information flow in edge-client collaboration and extract more generalized potential relationships between clients. In SpreadFGL, an adaptive graph imputation generator incorporated with a versatile assessor is first designed to exploit the potential links between subgraphs, without sharing raw data. Next, a new negative sampling mechanism is developed to make SpreadFGL concentrate on more refined information in downstream tasks. To facilitate load balancing at the edge layer, SpreadFGL follows a distributed training manner that enables fast model convergence. Using real-world testbed and benchmark graph datasets, extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed SpreadFGL. The results show that SpreadFGL achieves higher accuracy and faster convergence against state-of-the-art algorithms.
Read more7/17/2024
0
Federated Graph Learning with Structure Proxy Alignment
Xingbo Fu, Zihan Chen, Binchi Zhang, Chen Chen, Jundong Li
Federated Graph Learning (FGL) aims to learn graph learning models over graph data distributed in multiple data owners, which has been applied in various applications such as social recommendation and financial fraud detection. Inherited from generic Federated Learning (FL), FGL similarly has the data heterogeneity issue where the label distribution may vary significantly for distributed graph data across clients. For instance, a client can have the majority of nodes from a class, while another client may have only a few nodes from the same class. This issue results in divergent local objectives and impairs FGL convergence for node-level tasks, especially for node classification. Moreover, FGL also encounters a unique challenge for the node classification task: the nodes from a minority class in a client are more likely to have biased neighboring information, which prevents FGL from learning expressive node embeddings with Graph Neural Networks (GNNs). To grapple with the challenge, we propose FedSpray, a novel FGL framework that learns local class-wise structure proxies in the latent space and aligns them to obtain global structure proxies in the server. Our goal is to obtain the aligned structure proxies that can serve as reliable, unbiased neighboring information for node classification. To achieve this, FedSpray trains a global feature-structure encoder and generates unbiased soft targets with structure proxies to regularize local training of GNN models in a personalized way. We conduct extensive experiments over four datasets, and experiment results validate the superiority of FedSpray compared with other baselines. Our code is available at https://github.com/xbfu/FedSpray.
Read more8/20/2024
🧠
0
Equipping Federated Graph Neural Networks with Structure-aware Group Fairness
Nan Cui, Xiuling Wang, Wendy Hui Wang, Violet Chen, Yue Ning
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have been widely used for various types of graph data processing and analytical tasks in different domains. Training GNNs over centralized graph data can be infeasible due to privacy concerns and regulatory restrictions. Thus, federated learning (FL) becomes a trending solution to address this challenge in a distributed learning paradigm. However, as GNNs may inherit historical bias from training data and lead to discriminatory predictions, the bias of local models can be easily propagated to the global model in distributed settings. This poses a new challenge in mitigating bias in federated GNNs. To address this challenge, we propose $text{F}^2$GNN, a Fair Federated Graph Neural Network, that enhances group fairness of federated GNNs. As bias can be sourced from both data and learning algorithms, $text{F}^2$GNN aims to mitigate both types of bias under federated settings. First, we provide theoretical insights on the connection between data bias in a training graph and statistical fairness metrics of the trained GNN models. Based on the theoretical analysis, we design $text{F}^2$GNN which contains two key components: a fairness-aware local model update scheme that enhances group fairness of the local models on the client side, and a fairness-weighted global model update scheme that takes both data bias and fairness metrics of local models into consideration in the aggregation process. We evaluate $text{F}^2$GNN empirically versus a number of baseline methods, and demonstrate that $text{F}^2$GNN outperforms these baselines in terms of both fairness and model accuracy.
Read more5/15/2024