Tax Credits and Household Behavior: The Roles of Myopic Decision-Making and Liquidity in a Simulated Economy
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Examines the impact of tax credits on household behavior in a simulated economy
- Explores the roles of myopic decision-making and liquidity constraints in shaping household responses to tax credits
- Uses an agent-based modeling approach to simulate household decision-making and economic dynamics
Plain English Explanation
This research paper investigates how tax credits, which are financial incentives provided by the government, can influence the behavior of households or individuals in an economic system. The key focus is on understanding the roles of two important factors: myopic decision-making and liquidity constraints (the ability to access cash or credit).
The researchers used a computer simulation model to create an artificial economy, populated with virtual households that make decisions about their spending, saving, and investment. By simulating the effects of different tax credit policies, the researchers were able to observe how households with varying decision-making styles and financial constraints responded to these incentives.
The goal was to gain insights into how tax credits can shape household behavior and ultimately impact the overall economic dynamics, such as wealth distribution and market interactions.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed an agent-based simulation model to study the effects of tax credits on household behavior. In this model, each household is represented as an autonomous agent that makes decisions about consumption, savings, and investment based on its own characteristics and constraints.
The key elements of the simulation include:
- Household agents with varying decision-making styles (myopic vs. forward-looking) and liquidity constraints
- Tax credit policies that provide financial incentives for certain household behaviors (e.g., investing in education, purchasing a home)
- An economic environment with market interactions and feedback loops between household decisions and macroeconomic outcomes
By running the simulation with different tax credit policies and observing the resulting household behaviors and economic dynamics, the researchers were able to draw insights about the roles of myopic decision-making and liquidity constraints in shaping the effectiveness of tax credits.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:
- The simulation model simplifies many aspects of the real-world economy, and the results may not fully capture the complexity of actual household and market behaviors.
- The assumptions about household decision-making, particularly the distinction between myopic and forward-looking agents, may not accurately reflect the diversity of human decision-making processes.
- The analysis does not consider how tax credits may interact with other policy interventions or macroeconomic factors, which could alter their overall impact.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential unintended consequences or equity concerns that may arise from the implementation of tax credit policies. Further research could investigate how such policies affect different socioeconomic groups and address potential fairness and incentive issues.
Conclusion
This research paper provides valuable insights into how tax credits can influence household behavior and economic dynamics in a simulated environment. The findings highlight the importance of considering both myopic decision-making and liquidity constraints when designing and evaluating tax credit policies.
The insights from this study could inform policymakers and economists as they seek to understand and shape the economic impacts of tax incentives and other fiscal policies. However, further research is needed to fully capture the complexity of real-world economic systems and address potential equity concerns.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Tax Credits and Household Behavior: The Roles of Myopic Decision-Making and Liquidity in a Simulated Economy
Jialin Dong, Kshama Dwarakanath, Svitlana Vyetrenko
There has been a growing interest in multi-agent simulators in the domain of economic modeling. However, contemporary research often involves developing reinforcement learning (RL) based models that focus solely on a single type of agents, such as households, firms, or the government. Such an approach overlooks the adaptation of interacting agents thereby failing to capture the complexity of real-world economic systems. In this work, we consider a multi-agent simulator comprised of RL agents of numerous types, including heterogeneous households, firm, central bank and government. In particular, we focus on the crucial role of the government in distributing tax credits to households. We conduct two broad categories of comprehensive experiments dealing with the impact of tax credits on 1) households with varied degrees of myopia (short-sightedness in spending and saving decisions), and 2) households with diverse liquidity profiles. The first category of experiments examines the impact of the frequency of tax credits (e.g. annual vs quarterly) on consumption patterns of myopic households. The second category of experiments focuses on the impact of varying tax credit distribution strategies on households with differing liquidities. We validate our simulation model by reproducing trends observed in real households upon receipt of unforeseen, uniform tax credits, as documented in a JPMorgan Chase report. Based on the results of the latter, we propose an innovative tax credit distribution strategy for the government to reduce inequality among households. We demonstrate the efficacy of this strategy in improving social welfare in our simulation results.
Read more8/21/2024
0
Subsidy design for better social outcomes
Maria-Florina Balcan, Matteo Pozzi, Dravyansh Sharma
Overcoming the impact of selfish behavior of rational players in multiagent systems is a fundamental problem in game theory. Without any intervention from a central agent, strategic users take actions in order to maximize their personal utility, which can lead to extremely inefficient overall system performance, often indicated by a high Price of Anarchy. Recent work (Lin et al. 2021) investigated and formalized yet another undesirable behavior of rational agents, that of avoiding freely available information about the game for selfish reasons, leading to worse social outcomes. A central planner can significantly mitigate these issues by injecting a subsidy to reduce certain costs associated with the system and obtain net gains in the system performance. Crucially, the planner needs to determine how to allocate this subsidy effectively. We formally show that designing subsidies that perfectly optimize the social good, in terms of minimizing the Price of Anarchy or preventing the information avoidance behavior, is computationally hard under standard complexity theoretic assumptions. On the positive side, we show that we can learn provably good values of subsidy in repeated games coming from the same domain. This data-driven subsidy design approach avoids solving computationally hard problems for unseen games by learning over polynomially many games. We also show that optimal subsidy can be learned with no-regret given an online sequence of games, under mild assumptions on the cost matrix. Our study focuses on two distinct games: a Bayesian extension of the well-studied fair cost-sharing game, and a component maintenance game with engineering applications.
Read more9/6/2024
👀
0
Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing
Jesse Thibodeau, Hadi Nekoei, Afaf Taik, Janarthanan Rajendran, Golnoosh Farnadi
The use of dynamic pricing by profit-maximizing firms gives rise to demand fairness concerns, measured by discrepancies in consumer groups' demand responses to a given pricing strategy. Notably, dynamic pricing may result in buyer distributions unreflective of those of the underlying population, which can be problematic in markets where fair representation is socially desirable. To address this, policy makers might leverage tools such as taxation and subsidy to adapt policy mechanisms dependent upon their social objective. In this paper, we explore the potential for AI methods to assist such intervention strategies. To this end, we design a basic simulated economy, wherein we introduce a dynamic social planner (SP) to generate corporate taxation schedules geared to incentivizing firms towards adopting fair pricing behaviours, and to use the collected tax budget to subsidize consumption among underrepresented groups. To cover a range of possible policy scenarios, we formulate our social planner's learning problem as a multi-armed bandit, a contextual bandit and finally as a full reinforcement learning (RL) problem, evaluating welfare outcomes from each case. To alleviate the difficulty in retaining meaningful tax rates that apply to less frequently occurring brackets, we introduce FairReplayBuffer, which ensures that our RL agent samples experiences uniformly across a discretized fairness space. We find that, upon deploying a learned tax and redistribution policy, social welfare improves on that of the fairness-agnostic baseline, and approaches that of the analytically optimal fairness-aware baseline for the multi-armed and contextual bandit settings, and surpassing it by 13.19% in the full RL setting.
Read more4/24/2024
🚀
0
Wealth inequality and utility: Effect evaluation of redistribution and consumption morals using macro-econophysical coupled approach
Takeshi Kato, Mohammad Rezoanul Hoque
Reducing wealth inequality and increasing utility are critical issues. This study reveals the effects of redistribution and consumption morals on wealth inequality and utility. To this end, we present a novel approach that couples the dynamic model of capital, consumption, and utility in macroeconomics with the interaction model of joint business and redistribution in econophysics. With this approach, we calculate the capital (wealth), the utility based on consumption, and the Gini index of these inequality using redistribution and consumption thresholds as moral parameters. The results show that: under-redistribution and waste exacerbate inequality; conversely, over-redistribution and stinginess reduce utility; and a balanced moderate moral leads to achieve both reduced inequality and increased utility. These findings provide renewed economic and numerical support for the moral importance known from philosophy, anthropology, and religion. The revival of redistribution and consumption morals should promote the transformation to a human mutual-aid economy, as indicated by philosopher and anthropologist, instead of the capitalist economy that has produced the current inequality. The practical challenge is to implement bottom-up social business, on a foothold of worker coops and platform cooperatives as a community against the state and the market, with moral consensus and its operation.
Read more5/24/2024