Fairness Incentives in Response to Unfair Dynamic Pricing

Overview

• The paper explores the use of dynamic pricing by profit-maximizing firms and the resulting demand fairness concerns.
• It proposes the use of AI methods to assist in designing tax and subsidy policies that incentivize firms to adopt fair pricing behaviors.
• The authors design a simulated economy with a dynamic social planner that learns optimal taxation and redistribution policies.

Plain English Explanation

Businesses often use dynamic pricing - changing prices based on factors like supply and demand. However, this can lead to unfairness, with some consumer groups paying more than others for the same product or service.

To address this, the researchers created a simulated economy with a "social planner" - an AI system that sets tax and subsidy policies. The goal is to incentivize businesses to price their products more fairly, so that the distribution of buyers reflects the overall population.

The social planner uses different AI techniques, like multi-armed bandits and reinforcement learning, to learn the best tax and subsidy policies. This helps ensure that underrepresented groups pay lower prices and overall social welfare is improved.

Technical Explanation

The researchers designed a simulated economy with a dynamic social planner (SP) that generates corporate taxation schedules to incentivize firms towards fair pricing. The SP uses the collected tax revenue to subsidize consumption among underrepresented groups.

To cover a range of policy scenarios, the authors formulate the SP's learning problem as a multi-armed bandit, a contextual bandit, and a full reinforcement learning (RL) problem. They evaluate the welfare outcomes from each case.

To address the difficulty in retaining meaningful tax rates for less frequently occurring fairness brackets, the researchers introduce the "FairReplayBuffer" technique. This ensures the RL agent samples experiences uniformly across a discretized fairness space.

The results show that upon deploying the learned tax and redistribution policy, social welfare improves compared to a fairness-agnostic baseline. In the full RL setting, the learned policy surpasses the analytically optimal fairness-aware baseline by 13.19%.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a novel approach to addressing demand fairness concerns arising from dynamic pricing. The use of AI-based policy learning is a promising direction, as it can capture complex interactions and adapt to changing market conditions.

However, the simulated economy may not fully capture the nuances of real-world markets and consumer behaviors. Further research is needed to validate the findings in more realistic settings and account for factors like information asymmetry, strategic firm behavior, and the impact of taxation on innovation.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the practical implementation challenges of such a system, such as data availability, computational complexity, and potential unintended consequences of the policies.

Conclusion

This research explores the potential of AI-driven policy interventions to address demand fairness issues in markets with dynamic pricing. By designing a social planner that learns optimal taxation and redistribution strategies, the authors demonstrate improvements in social welfare compared to fairness-agnostic baselines.

The findings suggest that AI-based methods could be a valuable tool for policymakers seeking to promote socially optimal energy usage and network-aware welfare maximization in dynamic pricing environments. Further research and real-world testing would be needed to fully assess the viability and scalability of this approach.