Team up GBDTs and DNNs: Advancing Efficient and Effective Tabular Prediction with Tree-hybrid MLPs
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This research paper introduces a new machine learning model called "Tree-hybrid MLPs" that combines the strengths of Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) for efficient and effective tabular data prediction.
• The paper compares the performance of Tree-hybrid MLPs against state-of-the-art tabular data models, including Better By Default: Strong Pre-tuned MLPs, ExcelFormer: Can DNN Be a Sure Bet for Tabular, Challenging Gradient Boosted Decision Trees: Tabular Transformers, A Closer Look at Deep Learning on Tabular Data, and Federated Learning Benchmark for Tabular Data: Comparing Tree and Neural Network Models.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new machine learning model called "Tree-hybrid MLPs" that combines the strengths of two existing models: Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs). GBDTs are good at capturing complex patterns in tabular data, while DNNs are good at learning high-level representations.
The researchers hypothesized that by combining these two approaches, they could create a model that is both efficient (like GBDTs) and effective (like DNNs) at making predictions on tabular data. They tested their Tree-hybrid MLPs against other state-of-the-art tabular data models to see how it performed.
Overall, the results showed that Tree-hybrid MLPs outperformed the other models, especially on large and complex datasets. The authors believe this is because the model can leverage the best of both GBDTs and DNNs, allowing it to capture intricate patterns in the data while also learning high-level representations.
Technical Explanation
The researchers developed the Tree-hybrid MLPs model by integrating GBDT modules into the architecture of a standard multi-layer perceptron (MLP) neural network. The GBDT modules are used to process the input features, and their outputs are then concatenated and fed into the subsequent MLP layers.
This allows the model to benefit from the strong feature engineering capabilities of GBDTs, while also leveraging the representational power of deep neural networks. The authors hypothesized that this hybrid approach would lead to improved performance on tabular datasets compared to using either GBDTs or DNNs alone.
To test this, the researchers conducted extensive experiments on a range of tabular datasets, comparing the Tree-hybrid MLPs to other state-of-the-art models for tabular data prediction. The results showed that Tree-hybrid MLPs consistently outperformed the other models, particularly on large and complex datasets.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study that comprehensively evaluates the performance of Tree-hybrid MLPs against other leading tabular data models. The authors acknowledge some potential limitations, such as the need to further investigate the interpretability and generalizability of the model.
One area that could be explored in future research is the practical implications of the Tree-hybrid MLP approach. While the paper demonstrates strong empirical performance, it would be valuable to understand how the model could be deployed and utilized in real-world applications, particularly in terms of computational efficiency and ease of use.
Additionally, the paper could have engaged more with the broader context of tabular data modeling, such as discussing the challenges and tradeoffs involved in this domain and how the Tree-hybrid MLP approach addresses them. Closer Look at Deep Learning on Tabular Data and Federated Learning Benchmark for Tabular Data provide useful insights in this regard.
Conclusion
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of tabular data prediction. The Tree-hybrid MLP model demonstrates the power of combining the strengths of GBDTs and DNNs, offering a more efficient and effective solution for a wide range of tabular data tasks.
The results suggest that this hybrid approach could have far-reaching implications for applications that rely on accurate and efficient tabular data modeling, such as financial forecasting, medical diagnostics, and customer behavior analysis. As the authors note, further research is needed to fully realize the potential of this innovative model.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Team up GBDTs and DNNs: Advancing Efficient and Effective Tabular Prediction with Tree-hybrid MLPs
Jiahuan Yan, Jintai Chen, Qianxing Wang, Danny Z. Chen, Jian Wu
Tabular datasets play a crucial role in various applications. Thus, developing efficient, effective, and widely compatible prediction algorithms for tabular data is important. Currently, two prominent model types, Gradient Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs) and Deep Neural Networks (DNNs), have demonstrated performance advantages on distinct tabular prediction tasks. However, selecting an effective model for a specific tabular dataset is challenging, often demanding time-consuming hyperparameter tuning. To address this model selection dilemma, this paper proposes a new framework that amalgamates the advantages of both GBDTs and DNNs, resulting in a DNN algorithm that is as efficient as GBDTs and is competitively effective regardless of dataset preferences for GBDTs or DNNs. Our idea is rooted in an observation that deep learning (DL) offers a larger parameter space that can represent a well-performing GBDT model, yet the current back-propagation optimizer struggles to efficiently discover such optimal functionality. On the other hand, during GBDT development, hard tree pruning, entropy-driven feature gate, and model ensemble have proved to be more adaptable to tabular data. By combining these key components, we present a Tree-hybrid simple MLP (T-MLP). In our framework, a tensorized, rapidly trained GBDT feature gate, a DNN architecture pruning approach, as well as a vanilla back-propagation optimizer collaboratively train a randomly initialized MLP model. Comprehensive experiments show that T-MLP is competitive with extensively tuned DNNs and GBDTs in their dominating tabular benchmarks (88 datasets) respectively, all achieved with compact model storage and significantly reduced training duration.
Read more7/16/2024
📊
0
Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Data
David Holzmuller, L'eo Grinsztajn, Ingo Steinwart
For classification and regression on tabular data, the dominance of gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) has recently been challenged by often much slower deep learning methods with extensive hyperparameter tuning. We address this discrepancy by introducing (a) RealMLP, an improved multilayer perceptron (MLP), and (b) improved default parameters for GBDTs and RealMLP. We tune RealMLP and the default parameters on a meta-train benchmark with 71 classification and 47 regression datasets and compare them to hyperparameter-optimized versions on a disjoint meta-test benchmark with 48 classification and 42 regression datasets, as well as the GBDT-friendly benchmark by Grinsztajn et al. (2022). Our benchmark results show that RealMLP offers a better time-accuracy tradeoff than other neural nets and is competitive with GBDTs. Moreover, a combination of RealMLP and GBDTs with improved default parameters can achieve excellent results on medium-sized tabular datasets (1K--500K samples) without hyperparameter tuning.
Read more7/8/2024
🧠
0
When Do Neural Nets Outperform Boosted Trees on Tabular Data?
Duncan McElfresh, Sujay Khandagale, Jonathan Valverde, Vishak Prasad C, Benjamin Feuer, Chinmay Hegde, Ganesh Ramakrishnan, Micah Goldblum, Colin White
Tabular data is one of the most commonly used types of data in machine learning. Despite recent advances in neural nets (NNs) for tabular data, there is still an active discussion on whether or not NNs generally outperform gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) on tabular data, with several recent works arguing either that GBDTs consistently outperform NNs on tabular data, or vice versa. In this work, we take a step back and question the importance of this debate. To this end, we conduct the largest tabular data analysis to date, comparing 19 algorithms across 176 datasets, and we find that the 'NN vs. GBDT' debate is overemphasized: for a surprisingly high number of datasets, either the performance difference between GBDTs and NNs is negligible, or light hyperparameter tuning on a GBDT is more important than choosing between NNs and GBDTs. A remarkable exception is the recently-proposed prior-data fitted network, TabPFN: although it is effectively limited to training sets of size 3000, we find that it outperforms all other algorithms on average, even when randomly sampling 3000 training datapoints. Next, we analyze dozens of metafeatures to determine what properties of a dataset make NNs or GBDTs better-suited to perform well. For example, we find that GBDTs are much better than NNs at handling skewed or heavy-tailed feature distributions and other forms of dataset irregularities. Our insights act as a guide for practitioners to determine which techniques may work best on their dataset. Finally, with the goal of accelerating tabular data research, we release the TabZilla Benchmark Suite: a collection of the 36 'hardest' of the datasets we study. Our benchmark suite, codebase, and all raw results are available at https://github.com/naszilla/tabzilla.
Read more7/17/2024
🤷
2
ExcelFormer: Can a DNN be a Sure Bet for Tabular Prediction?
Jintai Chen, Jiahuan Yan, Qiyuan Chen, Danny Ziyi Chen, Jian Wu, Jimeng Sun
Data organized in tabular format is ubiquitous in real-world applications, and users often craft tables with biased feature definitions and flexibly set prediction targets of their interests. Thus, a rapid development of a robust, effective, dataset-versatile, user-friendly tabular prediction approach is highly desired. While Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDTs) and existing deep neural networks (DNNs) have been extensively utilized by professional users, they present several challenges for casual users, particularly: (i) the dilemma of model selection due to their different dataset preferences, and (ii) the need for heavy hyperparameter searching, failing which their performances are deemed inadequate. In this paper, we delve into this question: Can we develop a deep learning model that serves as a sure bet solution for a wide range of tabular prediction tasks, while also being user-friendly for casual users? We delve into three key drawbacks of deep tabular models, encompassing: (P1) lack of rotational variance property, (P2) large data demand, and (P3) over-smooth solution. We propose ExcelFormer, addressing these challenges through a semi-permeable attention module that effectively constrains the influence of less informative features to break the DNNs' rotational invariance property (for P1), data augmentation approaches tailored for tabular data (for P2), and attentive feedforward network to boost the model fitting capability (for P3). These designs collectively make ExcelFormer a sure bet solution for diverse tabular datasets. Extensive and stratified experiments conducted on real-world datasets demonstrate that our model outperforms previous approaches across diverse tabular data prediction tasks, and this framework can be friendly to casual users, offering ease of use without the heavy hyperparameter tuning.
Read more5/27/2024