Tell my why: Training preferences-based RL with human preferences and step-level explanations

Overview

• This paper proposes a new preference-based reinforcement learning (PBRL) method that allows humans to provide more expressive feedback on agent trajectories.
• Current PBRL methods have limitations in the feedback interface, making it difficult for non-expert humans to effectively train agents.
• The proposed method introduces an interface where humans can indicate their preferences between trajectories and provide explanations for their choices, highlighting the most relevant parts of the trajectories.
• The authors evaluate their method in simulations using a simulated human oracle and find that the additional explanatory feedback can improve the speed of learning.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to train artificial intelligence (AI) agents using preference-based reinforcement learning. In preference-based reinforcement learning, humans provide feedback to the AI agent by indicating which of two possible actions or behaviors they prefer, rather than directly telling the agent what to do.

This is useful in situations where it's hard for a human to precisely describe the desired behavior, such as navigating a complex environment. The human can just say "I prefer this path over that one" instead of trying to write out detailed instructions.

However, the current preference-based methods have some limitations - they don't give humans a very good way to explain why they prefer one option over another. The new method proposed in this paper aims to address that by allowing humans to provide explanations for their preferences.

Specifically, the human can highlight the parts of each trajectory that were most important in shaping their preference. This additional feedback helps the AI agent learn more quickly what behaviors the human values. The authors test this approach in simulations and find that the added explanatory power does indeed speed up the agent's learning process.

The key innovation is giving humans a more expressive interface to provide feedback, going beyond simply choosing between options to explaining their reasoning. This could make it easier for non-experts to effectively train AI agents, opening up the technology to a wider range of applications.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new preference-based reinforcement learning (PBRL) method that allows humans to provide richer feedback to the agent being trained. In traditional PBRL approaches, the human simply indicates which of two presented trajectories (sequences of actions) they prefer. This type of feedback can be useful when more direct reward signals are difficult to specify, as is common in complex real-world domains.

However, the authors argue that current PBRL methods have limitations in the feedback interface, making it challenging for non-expert humans to effectively train the agent. To address this, their proposed method introduces an interface where the human can not only select their preferred trajectory, but also provide a textual explanation or annotation highlighting the most relevant parts of each trajectory.

This additional explanatory feedback is intended to give the human a more expressive way to communicate their preferences to the agent. By focusing on the key aspects of the trajectories that influenced their choice, the human can provide more informative guidance to the learning process.

The authors evaluate their method in simulation experiments using a simulated "human oracle" that provides realistic preference and explanation data. They find that the inclusion of the explanatory feedback can indeed lead to faster learning compared to standard PBRL approaches, as the agent is able to more effectively leverage the human's reasoning about the important trajectory elements.

The paper also discusses potential limitations and future research directions, such as how to handle inconsistent or noisy human feedback, and how to scale the approach to more complex real-world scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and promising approach to enhancing preference-based reinforcement learning by incorporating richer human feedback. The key innovation - allowing humans to explain their trajectory preferences rather than just choosing between them - seems well-motivated and the simulation results are encouraging.

That said, the authors acknowledge several important limitations and caveats that merit further consideration. For example, the simulated "human oracle" used in the experiments may not fully capture the complexities of real human feedback, which could be inconsistent, biased, or otherwise challenging to reliably interpret.

Additionally, the experiments are relatively simple and it's unclear how well the approach would scale to more complex real-world domains where the space of possible trajectories is much larger. Handling such scaling challenges, as well as potential issues around interpreting natural language explanations, will be important areas for future research.

Another potential concern is the reliance on textual explanations - while this does provide a more expressive interface for humans, it may not be suitable for all users or applications. Exploring alternative explanation modalities, such as visual annotations or other non-verbal feedback, could further broaden the accessibility and applicability of the approach.

Overall, this paper represents a thoughtful contribution to the field of preference-based reinforcement learning and interactive machine learning. The proposed method shows promise in enabling more effective human-in-the-loop training of AI agents, and the authors have outlined a clear path for future research to address the remaining challenges.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a new preference-based reinforcement learning method that allows humans to provide richer feedback to the trained agent by not only indicating their preferred trajectory, but also explaining their reasoning through annotated textual explanations.

The key innovation is the addition of this explanatory feedback, which aims to give humans a more expressive interface for communicating their preferences and the rationale behind them. The simulation results suggest this approach can lead to faster agent learning compared to standard preference-based methods.

While the paper highlights some important limitations and areas for future work, the proposed technique represents a promising step forward in enabling more effective human-AI collaboration and making reinforcement learning more accessible to non-expert users. As AI systems become increasingly integrated into our lives, methods like this that prioritize interpretable and accessible human-in-the-loop training will likely become increasingly important.