Reinforcement Learning from Diverse Human Preferences
2301.11774
0
0
🏅
Abstract
The complexity of designing reward functions has been a major obstacle to the wide application of deep reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. Describing an agent's desired behaviors and properties can be difficult, even for experts. A new paradigm called reinforcement learning from human preferences (or preference-based RL) has emerged as a promising solution, in which reward functions are learned from human preference labels among behavior trajectories. However, existing methods for preference-based RL are limited by the need for accurate oracle preference labels. This paper addresses this limitation by developing a method for crowd-sourcing preference labels and learning from diverse human preferences. The key idea is to stabilize reward learning through regularization and correction in a latent space. To ensure temporal consistency, a strong constraint is imposed on the reward model that forces its latent space to be close to the prior distribution. Additionally, a confidence-based reward model ensembling method is designed to generate more stable and reliable predictions. The proposed method is tested on a variety of tasks in DMcontrol and Meta-world and has shown consistent and significant improvements over existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse feedback, paving the way for real-world applications of RL methods.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Designing reward functions has been a major challenge in deep reinforcement learning (RL)
- A new approach called reinforcement learning from human preferences has emerged as a promising solution
- This paper addresses the limitation of existing preference-based RL methods, which require accurate oracle preference labels
- The proposed method uses crowd-sourced preference labels and learns from diverse human preferences
Plain English Explanation
In reinforcement learning (RL), an agent learns to perform a task by receiving rewards for its actions. Designing these reward functions can be extremely difficult, even for experts. Reinforcement learning from human preferences is a new approach that aims to address this challenge.
The key idea is to learn the reward function from human preferences instead of explicitly defining it. Humans can provide feedback on the agent's behavior, indicating which actions they prefer. The agent then learns a reward function that aligns with these preferences.
However, existing methods for preference-based RL require very accurate preference labels from an "oracle" (a perfect source of feedback). This paper proposes a new method that can learn from more diverse, crowd-sourced human preferences. The method uses regularization and ensembling techniques to stabilize the reward learning process and generate more reliable predictions.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method for preference-based reinforcement learning that can learn from diverse human feedback. The key technical contributions are:
- Latent space regularization: The reward model is constrained to have a latent space close to a prior distribution, ensuring temporal consistency in the learned rewards.
- Confidence-based reward model ensembling: Multiple reward models are trained and ensembled based on their confidence, generating more stable and reliable predictions.
The proposed method is evaluated on a variety of DMControl and Meta-World tasks, and shown to outperform existing preference-based RL algorithms when learning from diverse human feedback.
Critical Analysis
The paper addresses an important limitation of existing preference-based RL methods, which rely on accurate oracle feedback. By using crowd-sourced preferences and introducing novel regularization and ensembling techniques, the proposed method can learn more robust and reliable reward functions.
However, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations or potential issues with the approach. For example, it's unclear how the method would perform in the presence of noisy or inconsistent human feedback, or how scalable it would be to larger and more complex tasks.
Additionally, the paper could have discussed the broader implications and challenges of learning from human preferences in the context of real-world RL applications. Potential biases, ethical considerations, and the generalizability of the approach could have been explored further.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel method for preference-based reinforcement learning that can learn from diverse, crowd-sourced human feedback. By addressing the limitation of existing methods that require accurate oracle labels, the proposed approach paves the way for more practical and widespread application of RL techniques in real-world scenarios.
The key innovations, such as latent space regularization and confidence-based reward model ensembling, demonstrate the potential of leveraging diverse human preferences to guide RL agent behavior. While further research is needed to address the method's limitations, this work represents an important step forward in the field of reinforcement learning from human feedback.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
New!Beyond Human Preferences: Exploring Reinforcement Learning Trajectory Evaluation and Improvement through LLMs
Zichao Shen, Tianchen Zhu, Qingyun Sun, Shiqi Gao, Jianxin Li
0
0
Reinforcement learning (RL) faces challenges in evaluating policy trajectories within intricate game tasks due to the difficulty in designing comprehensive and precise reward functions. This inherent difficulty curtails the broader application of RL within game environments characterized by diverse constraints. Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) presents a pioneering framework that capitalizes on human preferences as pivotal reward signals, thereby circumventing the need for meticulous reward engineering. However, obtaining preference data from human experts is costly and inefficient, especially under conditions marked by complex constraints. To tackle this challenge, we propose a LLM-enabled automatic preference generation framework named LLM4PG , which harnesses the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) to abstract trajectories, rank preferences, and reconstruct reward functions to optimize conditioned policies. Experiments on tasks with complex language constraints demonstrated the effectiveness of our LLM-enabled reward functions, accelerating RL convergence and overcoming stagnation caused by slow or absent progress under original reward structures. This approach mitigates the reliance on specialized human knowledge and demonstrates the potential of LLMs to enhance RL's effectiveness in complex environments in the wild.
7/1/2024
🏅
Online Iterative Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with General Preference Model
Chenlu Ye, Wei Xiong, Yuheng Zhang, Nan Jiang, Tong Zhang
0
0
We study Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) under a general preference oracle. In particular, we do not assume that there exists a reward function and the preference signal is drawn from the Bradley-Terry model as most of the prior works do. We consider a standard mathematical formulation, the reverse-KL regularized minimax game between two LLMs for RLHF under general preference oracle. The learning objective of this formulation is to find a policy so that it is consistently preferred by the KL-regularized preference oracle over any competing LLMs. We show that this framework is strictly more general than the reward-based one, and propose sample-efficient algorithms for both the offline learning from a pre-collected preference dataset and online learning where we can query the preference oracle along the way of training. Empirical studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
4/26/2024
📶
Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL
Joey Hejna, Rafael Rafailov, Harshit Sikchi, Chelsea Finn, Scott Niekum, W. Bradley Knox, Dorsa Sadigh
0
0
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a popular paradigm for aligning models with human intent. Typically RLHF algorithms operate in two phases: first, use human preferences to learn a reward function and second, align the model by optimizing the learned reward via reinforcement learning (RL). This paradigm assumes that human preferences are distributed according to reward, but recent work suggests that they instead follow the regret under the user's optimal policy. Thus, learning a reward function from feedback is not only based on a flawed assumption of human preference, but also leads to unwieldy optimization challenges that stem from policy gradients or bootstrapping in the RL phase. Because of these optimization challenges, contemporary RLHF methods restrict themselves to contextual bandit settings (e.g., as in large language models) or limit observation dimensionality (e.g., state-based robotics). We overcome these limitations by introducing a new family of algorithms for optimizing behavior from human feedback using the regret-based model of human preferences. Using the principle of maximum entropy, we derive Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions, circumventing the need for RL. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs. This enables CPL to elegantly scale to high-dimensional and sequential RLHF problems while being simpler than prior methods.
5/1/2024
Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback
Ilgee Hong, Zichong Li, Alexander Bukharin, Yixiao Li, Haoming Jiang, Tianbao Yang, Tuo Zhao
0
0
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values by learning rewards from human preference data. Due to various reasons, however, such data typically takes the form of rankings over pairs of trajectory segments, which fails to capture the varying strengths of preferences across different pairs. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO), designed to address this uncertainty in preference strength. By incorporating an adaptive scaling parameter into the loss for each pair, our method increases the flexibility of the reward function. Specifically, it assigns small scaling parameters to pairs with ambiguous preferences, leading to more comparable rewards, and large scaling parameters to those with clear preferences for more distinct rewards. Computationally, our proposed loss function is strictly convex and univariate with respect to each scaling parameter, enabling its efficient optimization through a simple second-order algorithm. Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks, including direct preference optimization (DPO). Our experiments with robotic control and natural language generation with large language models (LLMs) show that our method not only improves policy performance but also aligns reward function selection more closely with policy optimization, simplifying the hyperparameter tuning process.
6/6/2024