Testable Learning with Distribution Shift

Read original: arXiv:2311.15142 - Published 5/22/2024 by Adam R. Klivans, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan
Total Score

0

👀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper addresses the fundamental problem of learning with distribution shift, where a model is trained on one data distribution but needs to perform well on a different test distribution.
  • The standard approach is to bound the model's loss in terms of the distance between the training and test distributions, but this is often difficult to compute.
  • The paper proposes a new "testable learning with distribution shift" model, where the learner outputs a classifier that performs well on the test distribution, as long as samples from both distributions pass an associated test.
  • The paper presents positive results for learning well-studied concept classes like halfspaces, intersections of halfspaces, and decision trees, when the training and test distributions have the same marginal.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, it's common for the data used to train a model (the "training distribution") to be different from the data the model will encounter during deployment (the "test distribution"). This is known as the "distribution shift" problem, and it can cause a trained model to perform poorly on real-world data.

The standard approach to this problem is to try to measure the "distance" between the training and test distributions, and then use that distance to bound the model's performance on the test data. However, computing these distribution distances can be very difficult.

This paper proposes a new way of thinking about the distribution shift problem. Instead of trying to measure the distance between distributions, the authors introduce a "testable learning with distribution shift" model. In this model, the learner outputs a classifier that performs well on the test distribution,

as long as
samples from both the training and test distributions pass a certain "test" that the learner also outputs.

The key idea is that if the training and test distributions have the same "marginal" (i.e., the same underlying distribution of the input features), then the learner can use this fact to efficiently certify the performance of the classifier on the test data, without needing to compute any distance between the distributions.

The paper shows that this approach can be used to efficiently learn several well-studied concept classes, like halfspaces, intersections of halfspaces, and decision trees, even when the training and test distributions are quite different. This is a significant advance, as no efficient algorithms for these basic cases were known before without strong assumptions.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new model called "testable learning with distribution shift", where the learner outputs a classifier

and
a test that this classifier will pass on both the training and test distributions. The key requirement is that the test must accept if the marginals of the two distributions are the same.

For the realizable case (where there exists a halfspace consistent with both the training and test distributions), the authors combine a moment-matching approach with ideas from active learning to efficiently estimate the "disagreement region" between the two distributions. This allows them to learn halfspaces in this setting.

To extend the results to the non-realizable case, the authors apply recent work from testable (agnostic) learning. More generally, the paper shows that any function class with low-degree $L_2$-sandwiching polynomial approximators can be learned in their model. The authors use constructions from the pseudorandomness literature to obtain the required approximators.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes significant progress on the important problem of learning with distribution shift, introducing a new model that allows for efficient learning in cases where the standard approach fails. However, there are a few caveats to consider:

  1. The requirement that the training and test distributions have the same marginal may be difficult to verify in practice. The paper does not address how one would go about checking this condition.

  2. The positive results are limited to specific concept classes like halfspaces and decision trees. It's unclear how generalizable the techniques are to other more complex models or real-world data distributions.

  3. The paper does not discuss the runtime or sample complexity of the proposed algorithms in detail. While they are claimed to be efficient, a more thorough analysis would be helpful for understanding the practical applicability of the approaches.

  4. The "testable learning with distribution shift" model is a significant departure from the standard distribution shift setting. It's not obvious how the results in this paper relate to or compare with other work in the field. Further research may be needed to better situate this work within the broader context of distribution shift learning.

Overall, the paper presents an interesting new perspective on the distribution shift problem and demonstrates promising results for certain concept classes. However, more work is needed to fully understand the limitations, practical implications, and broader applicability of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper tackles the fundamental problem of learning with distribution shift, where a model trained on one data distribution needs to perform well on a different test distribution. The authors propose a new "testable learning with distribution shift" model that allows for efficient learning in cases where the standard approaches fail.

By requiring the training and test distributions to have the same marginal, the paper demonstrates positive results for learning well-studied concept classes like halfspaces, intersections of halfspaces, and decision trees. This is a significant advance, as no efficient algorithms for these basic cases were previously known without strong assumptions.

While the paper introduces an interesting new perspective on the distribution shift problem, there are still some open questions and limitations that warrant further research. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step forward in addressing a critical challenge in machine learning deployment.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👀

Total Score

0

Testable Learning with Distribution Shift

Adam R. Klivans, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan

We revisit the fundamental problem of learning with distribution shift, in which a learner is given labeled samples from training distribution $D$, unlabeled samples from test distribution $D'$ and is asked to output a classifier with low test error. The standard approach in this setting is to bound the loss of a classifier in terms of some notion of distance between $D$ and $D'$. These distances, however, seem difficult to compute and do not lead to efficient algorithms. We depart from this paradigm and define a new model called testable learning with distribution shift, where we can obtain provably efficient algorithms for certifying the performance of a classifier on a test distribution. In this model, a learner outputs a classifier with low test error whenever samples from $D$ and $D'$ pass an associated test; moreover, the test must accept if the marginal of $D$ equals the marginal of $D'$. We give several positive results for learning well-studied concept classes such as halfspaces, intersections of halfspaces, and decision trees when the marginal of $D$ is Gaussian or uniform on ${pm 1}^d$. Prior to our work, no efficient algorithms for these basic cases were known without strong assumptions on $D'$. For halfspaces in the realizable case (where there exists a halfspace consistent with both $D$ and $D'$), we combine a moment-matching approach with ideas from active learning to simulate an efficient oracle for estimating disagreement regions. To extend to the non-realizable setting, we apply recent work from testable (agnostic) learning. More generally, we prove that any function class with low-degree $L_2$-sandwiching polynomial approximators can be learned in our model. We apply constructions from the pseudorandomness literature to obtain the required approximators.

Read more

5/22/2024

Efficient Discrepancy Testing for Learning with Distribution Shift
Total Score

0

Efficient Discrepancy Testing for Learning with Distribution Shift

Gautam Chandrasekaran, Adam R. Klivans, Vasilis Kontonis, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan

A fundamental notion of distance between train and test distributions from the field of domain adaptation is discrepancy distance. While in general hard to compute, here we provide the first set of provably efficient algorithms for testing localized discrepancy distance, where discrepancy is computed with respect to a fixed output classifier. These results imply a broad set of new, efficient learning algorithms in the recently introduced model of Testable Learning with Distribution Shift (TDS learning) due to Klivans et al. (2023). Our approach generalizes and improves all prior work on TDS learning: (1) we obtain universal learners that succeed simultaneously for large classes of test distributions, (2) achieve near-optimal error rates, and (3) give exponential improvements for constant depth circuits. Our methods further extend to semi-parametric settings and imply the first positive results for low-dimensional convex sets. Additionally, we separate learning and testing phases and obtain algorithms that run in fully polynomial time at test time.

Read more

6/14/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Tolerant Algorithms for Learning with Arbitrary Covariate Shift

Surbhi Goel, Abhishek Shetty, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan

We study the problem of learning under arbitrary distribution shift, where the learner is trained on a labeled set from one distribution but evaluated on a different, potentially adversarially generated test distribution. We focus on two frameworks: PQ learning [Goldwasser, A. Kalai, Y. Kalai, Montasser NeurIPS 2020], allowing abstention on adversarially generated parts of the test distribution, and TDS learning [Klivans, Stavropoulos, Vasilyan COLT 2024], permitting abstention on the entire test distribution if distribution shift is detected. All prior known algorithms either rely on learning primitives that are computationally hard even for simple function classes, or end up abstaining entirely even in the presence of a tiny amount of distribution shift. We address both these challenges for natural function classes, including intersections of halfspaces and decision trees, and standard training distributions, including Gaussians. For PQ learning, we give efficient learning algorithms, while for TDS learning, our algorithms can tolerate moderate amounts of distribution shift. At the core of our approach is an improved analysis of spectral outlier-removal techniques from learning with nasty noise. Our analysis can (1) handle arbitrarily large fraction of outliers, which is crucial for handling arbitrary distribution shifts, and (2) obtain stronger bounds on polynomial moments of the distribution after outlier removal, yielding new insights into polynomial regression under distribution shifts. Lastly, our techniques lead to novel results for tolerant testable learning [Rubinfeld and Vasilyan STOC 2023], and learning with nasty noise.

Read more

6/6/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Learning Intersections of Halfspaces with Distribution Shift: Improved Algorithms and SQ Lower Bounds

Adam R. Klivans, Konstantinos Stavropoulos, Arsen Vasilyan

Recent work of Klivans, Stavropoulos, and Vasilyan initiated the study of testable learning with distribution shift (TDS learning), where a learner is given labeled samples from training distribution $mathcal{D}$, unlabeled samples from test distribution $mathcal{D}'$, and the goal is to output a classifier with low error on $mathcal{D}'$ whenever the training samples pass a corresponding test. Their model deviates from all prior work in that no assumptions are made on $mathcal{D}'$. Instead, the test must accept (with high probability) when the marginals of the training and test distributions are equal. Here we focus on the fundamental case of intersections of halfspaces with respect to Gaussian training distributions and prove a variety of new upper bounds including a $2^{(k/epsilon)^{O(1)}} mathsf{poly}(d)$-time algorithm for TDS learning intersections of $k$ homogeneous halfspaces to accuracy $epsilon$ (prior work achieved $d^{(k/epsilon)^{O(1)}}$). We work under the mild assumption that the Gaussian training distribution contains at least an $epsilon$ fraction of both positive and negative examples ($epsilon$-balanced). We also prove the first set of SQ lower-bounds for any TDS learning problem and show (1) the $epsilon$-balanced assumption is necessary for $mathsf{poly}(d,1/epsilon)$-time TDS learning for a single halfspace and (2) a $d^{tilde{Omega}(log 1/epsilon)}$ lower bound for the intersection of two general halfspaces, even with the $epsilon$-balanced assumption. Our techniques significantly expand the toolkit for TDS learning. We use dimension reduction and coverings to give efficient algorithms for computing a localized version of discrepancy distance, a key metric from the domain adaptation literature.

Read more

5/22/2024