Testing Spreading Behavior in Networks with Arbitrary Topologies
0
🧪
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper studies the problem of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies.
- The focus is on the 1-BP (bootstrap percolation) rule, which models a simple spreading behavior where infected nodes stay infected forever and healthy nodes become infected if they have at least one infected neighbor.
- The paper analyzes the query complexity for testing this rule in two settings: when testing a single time step and when testing the environment over multiple time steps.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores a concept called property testing in dynamic environments. Property testing is a way to efficiently check if a system has a certain property without having to examine the entire system.
In this case, the authors focus on a simple rule called the 1-BP (bootstrap percolation) rule. This rule models a basic spreading behavior - once a node becomes "infected," it stays infected forever, and any healthy node becomes infected if it has at least one infected neighbor.
The researchers look at two different scenarios. In the first, they test the system at a single point in time. In the second, they test the system over multiple time steps as the infection spreads.
For the single time step case, the authors show upper bounds on the number of queries (or checks) needed to test the system, as well as lower bounds that match those upper bounds in certain situations. For the multi-time step case, they provide upper bounds on the number of queries needed.
The key insights are about the efficiency of testing this simple infection rule in dynamic environments, which could have applications in areas like social learning on community-structured graphs or monitoring the spread of information or disease.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds on prior work by Goldreich and Ron and Nakar and Ron to study property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies.
For the single time step case, the authors show that the worst-case query complexity is either O(Δ/ε) or Õ(√n/ε), whichever is smaller. Here, Δ is the maximum degree of a node, n is the number of vertices, and ε is the error parameter. They also provide matching lower bounds for both one-sided and two-sided error testers.
In the multi-time step setting, where the evolution spans T time steps, the authors show upper bounds of O(Δ^(T-1)/εT) and Õ(|E|/εT), where |E| is the number of edges in the underlying graph. Their algorithms are one-sided error, time-conforming, and non-adaptive, with the exception of the Õ(√n/ε) tester for T=2.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough analysis of the query complexity for testing the 1-BP rule in dynamic environments. The authors acknowledge that the 1-BP rule is the "simplest non-trivial" rule they consider, and it would be interesting to see how the results extend to more complex spreading behaviors.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects of property testing, and it would be valuable to see empirical evaluations of the proposed algorithms on real-world or synthetic datasets to understand their practical performance.
While the authors mention potential applications in areas like social learning and disease monitoring, the paper does not delve into these specific use cases in depth. Exploring the implications and potential impact of this work in such application domains could be a fruitful avenue for future research.
Conclusion
This paper initiates the study of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies, focusing on the simple 1-BP rule. The authors provide a comprehensive analysis of the query complexity for testing this rule in both single-time step and multi-time step scenarios, establishing upper and lower bounds.
The results contribute to our understanding of the efficiency of testing simple spreading behaviors in dynamic settings, which could have broader implications for fields like social learning and disease monitoring. Further research could explore the extensions to more complex rules and the practical applicability of the proposed algorithms.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧪
0
Testing Spreading Behavior in Networks with Arbitrary Topologies
Augusto Modanese, Yuichi Yoshida
Inspired by the works of Goldreich and Ron (J. ACM, 2017) and Nakar and Ron (ICALP, 2021), we initiate the study of property testing in dynamic environments with arbitrary topologies. Our focus is on the simplest non-trivial rule that can be tested, which corresponds to the 1-BP rule of bootstrap percolation and models a simple spreading behavior: Every infected node stays infected forever, and each healthy node becomes infected if and only if it has at least one infected neighbor. We show various results for both the case where we test a single time step of evolution and where the evolution spans several time steps. In the first, we show that the worst-case query complexity is $O(Delta/varepsilon)$ or $tilde{O}(sqrt{n}/varepsilon)$ (whichever is smaller), where $Delta$ and $n$ are the maximum degree of a node and number of vertices, respectively, in the underlying graph, and we also show lower bounds for both one- and two-sided error testers that match our upper bounds up to $Delta = o(sqrt{n})$ and $Delta = O(n^{1/3})$, respectively. In the second setting of testing the environment over $T$ time steps, we show upper bounds of $O(Delta^{T-1}/varepsilon T)$ and $tilde{O}(|E|/varepsilon T)$, where $E$ is the set of edges of the underlying graph. All of our algorithms are one-sided error, and all of them are also time-conforming and non-adaptive, with the single exception of the more complex $tilde{O}(sqrt{n}/varepsilon)$-query tester for the case $T = 2$.
Read more4/22/2024
🧪
0
Stochastic Distance in Property Testing
Uri Meir, Gregory Schwartzman, Yuichi Yoshida
We introduce a novel concept termed stochastic distance for property testing. Diverging from the traditional definition of distance, where a distance $t$ implies that there exist $t$ edges that can be added to ensure a graph possesses a certain property (such as $k$-edge-connectivity), our new notion implies that there is a high probability that adding $t$ random edges will endow the graph with the desired property. While formulating testers based on this new distance proves challenging in a sequential environment, it is much easier in a distributed setting. Taking $k$-edge-connectivity as a case study, we design ultra-fast testing algorithms in the CONGEST model. Our introduction of stochastic distance offers a more natural fit for the distributed setting, providing a promising avenue for future research in emerging models of computation.
Read more7/22/2024
0
Near-linear Time Dispersion of Mobile Agents
Yuichi Sudo, Masahiro Shibata, Junya Nakamura, Yonghwan Kim, Toshimitsu Masuzawa
Consider that there are $kle n$ agents in a simple, connected, and undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with $n$ nodes and $m$ edges. The goal of the dispersion problem is to move these $k$ agents to mutually distinct nodes. Agents can communicate only when they are at the same node, and no other communication means, such as whiteboards, are available. We assume that the agents operate synchronously. We consider two scenarios: when all agents are initially located at a single node (rooted setting) and when they are initially distributed over one or more nodes (general setting). Kshemkalyani and Sharma presented a dispersion algorithm for the general setting, which uses $O(m_k)$ time and $log(k + Delta)$ bits of memory per agent [OPODIS 2021], where $m_k$ is the maximum number of edges in any induced subgraph of $G$ with $k$ nodes, and $Delta$ is the maximum degree of $G$. This algorithm is currently the fastest in the literature, as no $o(m_k)$-time algorithm has been discovered, even for the rooted setting. In this paper, we present significantly faster algorithms for both the rooted and the general settings. First, we present an algorithm for the rooted setting that solves the dispersion problem in $O(klog min(k,Delta))=O(klog k)$ time using $O(log (k+Delta))$ bits of memory per agent. Next, we propose an algorithm for the general setting that achieves dispersion in $O(k log k cdot log min(k,Delta))=O(k log^2 k)$ time using $O(log (k+Delta))$ bits. Finally, for the rooted setting, we give a time-optimal (i.e.,~$O(k)$-time) algorithm with $O(Delta+log k)$ bits of space per agent. All algorithms presented in this paper work only in the synchronous setting, while several algorithms in the literature, including the one given by Kshemkalyani and Sharma at OPODIS 2021, work in the asynchronous setting.
Read more8/21/2024
❗
0
Self-stabilizing Graph Exploration by a Single Agent
Yuichi Sudo, Fukuhito Ooshita, Sayaka Kamei
In this paper, we present two self-stabilizing algorithms that enable a single (mobile) agent to explore graphs. The agent visits all nodes starting from any configuration, ie regardless of the initial state of the agent, the initial states of all nodes, and the initial location of the agent. We evaluate the algorithms using two metrics: cover time, which is the number of moves required to visit all nodes, and memory usage, which includes the storage needed for the state of the agent and the state of each node. The first algorithm is randomized. Given an integer $c = Omega(n)$, the cover time of this algorithm is optimal, ie $O(m)$ in expectation, and the memory requirements for the agent and each node $v$ are $O(log c)$ and $O(log (c+delta_v))$ bits, respectively, where $n$ and $m$ are the numbers of nodes and edges, respectively, and $delta_v$ is the degree of $v$. The second algorithm is deterministic. It requires an input integer $k ge max(D,d_{mathrm{max}})$, where $D$ and $d_{mathrm{max}}$ are the diameter and the maximum degree of the graph, respectively. The cover time of this algorithm is $O(m + nD)$, and it uses $O(log k)$ bits both for agent memory and each node.
Read more8/26/2024