Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a novel approach for enabling complex reasoning in large language models (LLMs) through a multi-round generation process.
- Presents a "textualized agent-style reasoning" framework that allows LLMs to break down tasks, generate intermediate steps, and reason about them.
- Demonstrates the framework's effectiveness on a range of complex reasoning tasks, including multi-step mathematical problem-solving and procedural task completion.
Plain English Explanation
The paper proposes a new way to help large language models (LLMs) tackle complex tasks that require step-by-step reasoning. The key idea is to have the LLM go through a multi-round process, where it first breaks down the overall task into smaller steps, then generates and reasons about those intermediate steps, and finally combines them to arrive at the final solution.
This "textualized agent-style reasoning" framework allows the LLM to better understand the task at hand and systematically work through it, rather than trying to generate the entire solution in one go. By breaking things down into smaller pieces, the LLM can focus on one step at a time and ensure the reasoning is sound before moving on.
The researchers show that this approach is effective for a variety of complex tasks, such as solving multi-step math problems or following detailed instructions to complete a procedure. The LLM is able to generate the necessary intermediate steps and provide explanations for its reasoning, which helps users understand how it arrived at the final solution.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a "textualized agent-style reasoning" framework that enables large language models (LLMs) to tackle complex reasoning tasks through a multi-round generation process. In this approach, the LLM first breaks down the overall task into a sequence of intermediate steps, then generates and reasons about each step individually, and finally combines the steps to produce the final solution.
The key components of the framework are:
-
Task Decomposition: The LLM is prompted to break down the given task into a series of subtasks or intermediate steps that need to be completed.
-
Step-by-Step Generation: For each intermediate step, the LLM generates a textual description of the reasoning and actions required to complete that step.
-
Step Reflection: The LLM is then prompted to review and reason about the generated intermediate steps, ensuring the logic is sound and the steps are coherent.
-
Step Combination: Finally, the LLM combines the individual steps into a final, complete solution to the original task.
The researchers evaluate this framework on a range of complex reasoning tasks, including multi-step mathematical problem-solving and procedural task completion. They find that the textualized agent-style approach significantly outperforms standard LLM generation, as it allows the model to break down the task, reason about the steps, and ensure the overall solution is coherent and correct.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, which is an important area of research given the growing prominence of LLMs in various applications. The textualized agent-style reasoning framework is a creative solution to the challenge of enabling LLMs to tackle complex, multi-step tasks.
One potential limitation of the approach is that it relies on the LLM's ability to accurately decompose the task and reason about the intermediate steps. If the task decomposition or step-by-step reasoning is flawed, the final solution may still be incorrect. The paper does not extensively discuss the robustness of the framework to errors or edge cases in the task decomposition or step generation.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a relatively narrow set of tasks, such as mathematical problem-solving and procedural instructions. It would be valuable to see the framework applied to a broader range of complex reasoning tasks, including more open-ended or ill-defined problems, to better understand its versatility and limitations.
Nevertheless, the textualized agent-style reasoning approach represents an important step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, and the insights from this research could inform the development of more advanced AI systems capable of tackling complex, real-world problems.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel "textualized agent-style reasoning" framework that enables large language models to tackle complex tasks through a multi-round generation process. By having the LLM break down the task, reason about intermediate steps, and combine them into a final solution, the approach significantly outperforms standard LLM generation on tasks requiring step-by-step reasoning.
This research represents an important advancement in the field of language model reasoning and could have significant implications for the development of more capable and reliable AI systems. While the framework has some limitations, the insights and techniques presented in the paper provide a valuable foundation for future work in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Textualized Agent-Style Reasoning for Complex Tasks by Multiple Round LLM Generation
Chen Liang, Zhifan Feng, Zihe Liu, Wenbin Jiang, Jinan Xu, Yufeng Chen, Yong Wang
Chain-of-thought prompting significantly boosts the reasoning ability of large language models but still faces three issues: hallucination problem, restricted interpretability, and uncontrollable generation. To address these challenges, we present AgentCOT, a llm-based autonomous agent framework, which can solve complex problems in an agent-style manner by multiple round LLM generation. At each step, AgentCOT selects an action and executes it to yield an intermediate result with supporting evidence. In addition, we integrate the step's index into the reasoning process to form a graph structure for complex inference logic. We introduce two new strategies to enhance the performance of AgentCOT.We conduct extensive experiments to verify the effectiveness of our method on six common benchmarks. Results exhibit that our method brings in substantial improvements over current competitive approaches.
Read more9/20/2024
💬
28
Multimodal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Language Models
Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang, Mu Li, Hai Zhao, George Karypis, Alex Smola
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive performance on complex reasoning by leveraging chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting to generate intermediate reasoning chains as the rationale to infer the answer. However, existing CoT studies have primarily focused on the language modality. We propose Multimodal-CoT that incorporates language (text) and vision (images) modalities into a two-stage framework that separates rationale generation and answer inference. In this way, answer inference can leverage better generated rationales that are based on multimodal information. Experimental results on ScienceQA and A-OKVQA benchmark datasets show the effectiveness of our proposed approach. With Multimodal-CoT, our model under 1 billion parameters achieves state-of-the-art performance on the ScienceQA benchmark. Our analysis indicates that Multimodal-CoT offers the advantages of mitigating hallucination and enhancing convergence speed. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/amazon-science/mm-cot.
Read more5/21/2024
0
CoT Rerailer: Enhancing the Reliability of Large Language Models in Complex Reasoning Tasks through Error Detection and Correction
Guangya Wan, Yuqi Wu, Jie Chen, Sheng Li
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enhances Large Language Models (LLMs) complex reasoning abilities by generating intermediate steps. However, these steps can introduce hallucinations and accumulate errors. We propose the CoT Rerailer to address these challenges, employing self-consistency and multi-agent debate systems to identify and rectify errors in the reasoning process. The CoT Rerailer first selects the most logically correct Reasoning Path (RP) using consistency checks and critical evaluation by automated agents. It then engages a multi-agent debate system to propose and validate corrections to ensure the generation of an error-free intermediate logical path. The corrected steps are then used to generate a revised reasoning chain to further reduce hallucinations and enhance answer quality. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach across diverse question-answering datasets in various knowledge domains. The CoT Rerailer enhances the reliability of LLM-generated reasoning, contributing to more trustworthy AI driven decision-making processes.
Read more9/19/2024
0
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
Read more6/19/2024