Theorizing Deception: A Scoping Review of Theory in Research on Dark Patterns and Deceptive Design

Overview

• Explores the theoretical foundations underpinning research on dark patterns and deceptive design
• Conducts a scoping review of academic literature to identify and analyze the theories used
• Aims to understand how researchers conceptualize and theorize deception in interactive user experiences

Plain English Explanation

This paper looks at the different theories and ideas that researchers use to study dark patterns and deceptive design in digital products and services. The researchers did a comprehensive review of academic literature to see what kinds of theories and frameworks researchers are drawing on to understand how and why certain digital designs can deceive or manipulate users.

The goal was to get a better sense of how researchers are conceptualizing the problem of deception in interactive user experiences. By analyzing the theoretical foundations used, the researchers hoped to shed light on how the academic community is approaching this important issue of dark patterns and deceptive design, and identify any gaps or areas that need further exploration.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a scoping review of academic literature on dark patterns and deceptive design. They searched various databases to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles, conference papers, and other scholarly works.

After screening the initial set of publications, the researchers ended up analyzing 68 papers that explicitly referenced theoretical frameworks or concepts. They coded these papers to identify the specific theories, models, and conceptual lenses being used to study deceptive design.

The analysis revealed that researchers are drawing on a diverse range of theories, including persuasion theory, choice architecture, deception theory, and cognitive biases. The most common theoretical perspectives were persuasion theory and choice architecture, which were used to examine how digital designs can subtly influence and nudge user behaviors.

The researchers also found that many studies lacked a strong theoretical foundation, instead relying on more informal conceptual frameworks or definitions of deception. This highlights an opportunity for the field to further develop and refine the theoretical underpinnings of research on dark patterns and deceptive design.

Critical Analysis

The scoping review provides a helpful overview of the theories and concepts currently being used to study dark patterns and deceptive design. By identifying the most common theoretical perspectives, as well as gaps in the literature, the paper points to areas that warrant further research and theorization.

One potential limitation is that the review was restricted to academic publications, and may have missed relevant theoretical work or frameworks from industry, policy, or other non-academic sources. Additionally, the analysis focused on identifying the theories used, but did not delve deeply into how those theories were being applied or the specific insights they provided.

There is also an opportunity to expand the review to consider how research on related topics, such as persuasive technology, ethics of design, and user manipulation, could inform and enhance the theoretical foundations for studying deceptive design patterns. Incorporating perspectives from adjacent fields could lead to a more holistic understanding of the problem.

Overall, this scoping review serves as a valuable starting point for understanding the current state of theory in this domain. Further work is needed to build on these findings, develop more robust theoretical frameworks, and translate them into practical guidance for designers, policymakers, and others working to address dark patterns and deceptive design.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive look at the theoretical foundations underlying research on dark patterns and deceptive design. By conducting a scoping review of academic literature, the researchers identified the key theories and concepts that researchers are using to conceptualize and study this important issue.

The findings suggest that while researchers are drawing on a diverse range of theoretical perspectives, there is an opportunity to further develop and refine the theoretical underpinnings of this field. Incorporating insights from related domains and translating theoretical frameworks into practical guidance could help strengthen the academic and real-world impact of research on dark patterns and deceptive design.

Ultimately, this work represents an important step in building a more robust understanding of how and why certain digital designs can deceive and manipulate users. As concerns around dark patterns continue to grow, this type of foundational research will be crucial for informing the development of solutions, policies, and ethical standards to protect users and promote more transparent and responsible design practices.