Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Read original: arXiv:2407.06754 - Published 7/12/2024 by Yanli Li, Zhongliang Guo, Nan Yang, Huaming Chen, Dong Yuan, Weiping Ding
Total Score

0

Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper provides a comprehensive survey of threats and defenses in the federated learning lifecycle.
  • Federated learning is a machine learning technique that allows multiple devices or organizations to collaboratively train a shared model without directly sharing their data.
  • The paper examines security and privacy challenges at each stage of the federated learning process, from model initialization to model updates and aggregation.
  • It also outlines various defense techniques that have been proposed to mitigate these threats, and discusses open challenges and future research directions.

Plain English Explanation

Federated learning is a way for multiple devices or organizations to work together to train a machine learning model without having to share their private data. This is useful in scenarios like healthcare, where hospitals may want to build an AI model to detect diseases, but can't share patient data due to privacy concerns.

Instead of centrally collecting all the data, federated learning allows each participant to train the model on their local data, and then share only the model updates with a central server. The server can then combine these updates to create a shared model that benefits everyone, without anyone having to reveal their private information.

However, the federated learning process introduces new security and privacy threats that need to be addressed. For example, malicious participants could try to insert backdoor attacks into the model, or adversaries could try to infer sensitive information from the shared model updates.

This paper surveys these threats at each stage of the federated learning lifecycle, and explores various defense techniques that have been proposed to mitigate them. For instance, differential privacy can be used to obfuscate the model updates, and secure aggregation can prevent adversaries from accessing individual updates.

The paper also discusses open challenges, such as the need for more efficient and scalable defense mechanisms, and the importance of considering the unique security and privacy requirements of different application domains.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive survey of threats and defenses in the federated learning lifecycle. Federated learning is a distributed machine learning technique that allows multiple devices or organizations to collaboratively train a shared model without directly sharing their data.

The authors first give an overview of the federated learning process, which typically involves the following steps:

  1. Model Initialization: A central server initializes a shared model, which is then distributed to participating clients.
  2. Local Training: Each client trains the model on their local data and computes model updates.
  3. Model Aggregation: The clients send their model updates to the server, which aggregates them to create an updated shared model.
  4. Model Deployment: The updated shared model is then deployed back to the clients for the next round of training.

The paper then examines the security and privacy challenges that can arise at each stage of this lifecycle. For example, during model initialization, adversaries could try to insert backdoor attacks into the initial model. During local training, clients could try to leak sensitive information through their model updates. And during model aggregation, malicious clients could attempt to manipulate the aggregation process to skew the final model.

The paper then surveys various defense mechanisms that have been proposed to mitigate these threats, such as differential privacy, secure aggregation, and Byzantine-robust aggregation. It also discusses open challenges, such as the need for more efficient and scalable defense techniques, and the importance of considering domain-specific security and privacy requirements.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and well-structured survey of the security and privacy challenges in federated learning, as well as the defense mechanisms that have been proposed to address them. The authors have done an excellent job of covering a wide range of threats at each stage of the federated learning lifecycle, and their discussion of the various defense techniques is both thorough and insightful.

One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve too deeply into the practical implementation and performance trade-offs of the different defense mechanisms. While the authors do mention some of these aspects, a more detailed analysis of the practical implications and real-world feasibility of the proposed defenses could have strengthened the survey.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the security and privacy implications of federated learning in more specific application domains, such as healthcare or finance. Different domains may have unique security and privacy requirements, and the authors could have provided more context on how the discussed threats and defenses might need to be tailored to these settings.

Overall, this paper is a valuable contribution to the growing body of research on federated learning security and privacy. By synthesizing the current state of the art and highlighting the key challenges and open problems, the authors have laid the groundwork for further advancements in this important area of study.

Conclusion

This comprehensive survey paper examines the security and privacy threats that can arise at each stage of the federated learning lifecycle, as well as the various defense mechanisms that have been proposed to mitigate these threats. The authors provide a thorough overview of the federated learning process and the unique security challenges it introduces, such as backdoor attacks, model manipulation, and privacy leaks.

The paper also explores a wide range of defense techniques, including differential privacy, secure aggregation, and Byzantine-robust aggregation, and discusses their strengths, weaknesses, and practical implications. Additionally, the authors highlight several open challenges and future research directions, such as the need for more efficient and scalable defense mechanisms, and the importance of considering domain-specific security and privacy requirements.

Overall, this survey is a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working in the field of federated learning, as it offers a comprehensive and up-to-date understanding of the key security and privacy considerations in this emerging area of machine learning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges
Total Score

0

Threats and Defenses in Federated Learning Life Cycle: A Comprehensive Survey and Challenges

Yanli Li, Zhongliang Guo, Nan Yang, Huaming Chen, Dong Yuan, Weiping Ding

Federated Learning (FL) offers innovative solutions for privacy-preserving collaborative machine learning (ML). Despite its promising potential, FL is vulnerable to various attacks due to its distributed nature, affecting the entire life cycle of FL services. These threats can harm the model's utility or compromise participants' privacy, either directly or indirectly. In response, numerous defense frameworks have been proposed, demonstrating effectiveness in specific settings and scenarios. To provide a clear understanding of the current research landscape, this paper reviews the most representative and state-of-the-art threats and defense frameworks throughout the FL service life cycle. We start by identifying FL threats that harm utility and privacy, including those with potential or direct impacts. Then, we dive into the defense frameworks, analyze the relationship between threats and defenses, and compare the trade-offs among different defense strategies. Finally, we summarize current research bottlenecks and offer insights into future research directions to conclude this survey. We hope this survey sheds light on trustworthy FL research and contributes to the FL community.

Read more

7/12/2024

⛏️

Total Score

0

Federated Learning Privacy: Attacks, Defenses, Applications, and Policy Landscape - A Survey

Joshua C. Zhao, Saurabh Bagchi, Salman Avestimehr, Kevin S. Chan, Somali Chaterji, Dimitris Dimitriadis, Jiacheng Li, Ninghui Li, Arash Nourian, Holger R. Roth

Deep learning has shown incredible potential across a vast array of tasks and accompanying this growth has been an insatiable appetite for data. However, a large amount of data needed for enabling deep learning is stored on personal devices and recent concerns on privacy have further highlighted challenges for accessing such data. As a result, federated learning (FL) has emerged as an important privacy-preserving technology enabling collaborative training of machine learning models without the need to send the raw, potentially sensitive, data to a central server. However, the fundamental premise that sending model updates to a server is privacy-preserving only holds if the updates cannot be reverse engineered to infer information about the private training data. It has been shown under a wide variety of settings that this premise for privacy does {em not} hold. In this survey paper, we provide a comprehensive literature review of the different privacy attacks and defense methods in FL. We identify the current limitations of these attacks and highlight the settings in which FL client privacy can be broken. We dissect some of the successful industry applications of FL and draw lessons for future successful adoption. We survey the emerging landscape of privacy regulation for FL. We conclude with future directions for taking FL toward the cherished goal of generating accurate models while preserving the privacy of the data from its participants.

Read more

5/7/2024

Privacy Threats and Countermeasures in Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Systematic Review
Total Score

0

Privacy Threats and Countermeasures in Federated Learning for Internet of Things: A Systematic Review

Adel ElZemity, Budi Arief

Federated Learning (FL) in the Internet of Things (IoT) environments can enhance machine learning by utilising decentralised data, but at the same time, it might introduce significant privacy and security concerns due to the constrained nature of IoT devices. This represents a research challenge that we aim to address in this paper. We systematically analysed recent literature to identify privacy threats in FL within IoT environments, and evaluate the defensive measures that can be employed to mitigate these threats. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach, we searched five publication databases (Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Wiley, ACM, and Science Direct), collating relevant papers published between 2017 and April 2024, a period which spans from the introduction of FL until now. Guided by the PRISMA protocol, we selected 49 papers to focus our systematic review on. We analysed these papers, paying special attention to the privacy threats and defensive measures -- specifically within the context of IoT -- using inclusion and exclusion criteria tailored to highlight recent advances and critical insights. We identified various privacy threats, including inference attacks, poisoning attacks, and eavesdropping, along with defensive measures such as Differential Privacy and Secure Multi-Party Computation. These defences were evaluated for their effectiveness in protecting privacy without compromising the functional integrity of FL in IoT settings. Our review underscores the necessity for robust and efficient privacy-preserving strategies tailored for IoT environments. Notably, there is a need for strategies against replay, evasion, and model stealing attacks. Exploring lightweight defensive measures and emerging technologies such as blockchain may help improve the privacy of FL in IoT, leading to the creation of FL models that can operate under variable network conditions.

Read more

7/26/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Mitigating Malicious Attacks in Federated Learning via Confidence-aware Defense

Qilei Li, Ahmed M. Abdelmoniem

Federated Learning (FL) is a distributed machine learning diagram that enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their private local data. However, FL systems are vulnerable to attacks that are happening in malicious clients through data poisoning and model poisoning, which can deteriorate the performance of aggregated global model. Existing defense methods typically focus on mitigating specific types of poisoning and are often ineffective against unseen types of attack. These methods also assume an attack happened moderately while is not always holds true in real. Consequently, these methods can significantly fail in terms of accuracy and robustness when detecting and addressing updates from attacked malicious clients. To overcome these challenges, in this work, we propose a simple yet effective framework to detect malicious clients, namely Confidence-Aware Defense (CAD), that utilizes the confidence scores of local models as criteria to evaluate the reliability of local updates. Our key insight is that malicious attacks, regardless of attack type, will cause the model to deviate from its previous state, thus leading to increased uncertainty when making predictions. Therefore, CAD is comprehensively effective for both model poisoning and data poisoning attacks by accurately identifying and mitigating potential malicious updates, even under varying degrees of attacks and data heterogeneity. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly enhances the robustness of FL systems against various types of attacks across various scenarios by achieving higher model accuracy and stability.

Read more

8/20/2024