TIC: Translate-Infer-Compile for accurate text to plan using LLMs and Logical Representations

Overview

• This research paper explores a method for generating plans from natural language planning task requests.
• The authors leverage the strengths of both large language models (LLMs) and classical planning tools to address the limitations of each approach.
• The proposed approach, called the TIC (Translate-Infer-Compile) approach, uses an LLM to generate an intermediate representation of the planning task, which is then used to derive additional information and generate the final planning task definition in the Planning Domain Definition Language (PDDL).

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the problem of generating plans from natural language instructions. For example, imagine you need to plan a trip to the grocery store, but you don't want to write out a detailed set of instructions. Instead, you could describe the task in plain language, like "Go to the grocery store, buy milk, eggs, and bread, then come back home."

Traditional planning systems, called classical planners, are very good at generating plans, but they require the task to be described in a specific, structured language called PDDL. On the other hand, large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 are excellent at processing natural language, but they don't perform well at actual planning tasks.

The authors propose a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of both techniques. First, they use an LLM to generate an intermediate representation of the natural language task description. Then, they use a logic reasoner to infer additional information from this intermediate representation. Finally, they compile this base and inferred information into the final PDDL task definition, which can be used by a classical planner to generate the plan.

The key benefit of this approach is that it reduces the errors introduced by the LLM, as the LLM is only responsible for generating the intermediate representation, not the final PDDL. This allows the system to achieve high accuracy on PDDL generation, even for complex planning tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a three-step approach called TIC (Translate-Infer-Compile) for generating plans from natural language task descriptions:

1. Translate: An LLM is used to generate an intermediate representation of the natural language task description. This intermediate representation is designed to be logically interpretable, making it easier to work with than the original natural language input.

2. Infer: A logic reasoner, specifically an Answer Set Programming (ASP) solver, is used to derive additional logically dependent information from the intermediate representation. This step helps to fill in any gaps or missing details in the original task description.

3. Compile: The base information from the intermediate representation and the inferred information are then used to generate the final PDDL task definition, which can be used by a classical planner to compute a plan.

The authors compare their TIC approach to previous methods that used LLMs to generate PDDL directly, and they find that the TIC approach significantly reduces the errors introduced by the LLM. This is because the LLM is only responsible for the intermediate representation, which is easier to generate accurately than the full PDDL specification.

The authors evaluate their approach on seven different planning domains and find that it achieves high accuracy on PDDL generation, outperforming the direct LLM-based approach for at least one of the LLMs tested.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to leveraging the strengths of both LLMs and classical planners for natural language planning tasks. The key innovation is the use of an intermediate representation that is designed to be logically interpretable, which allows the system to reduce the errors introduced by the LLM.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive evaluation of the approach's performance compared to other state-of-the-art methods. The authors only compare their approach to a direct LLM-based method, and it would be valuable to see how it performs against other hybrid approaches or specialized natural language planning systems.

Additionally, the paper does not address the potential limitations or biases of the LLM used in the system. LLMs can sometimes produce outputs that are plausible but factually incorrect or reflect societal biases, and it would be important to understand how these issues might impact the performance of the TIC approach.

Finally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity or runtime performance of the TIC approach, which could be an important consideration for real-world applications. As the system involves multiple steps, including the use of an ASP solver, the overall runtime and scalability of the approach should be examined.

Conclusion

The TIC approach presented in this paper represents an important step forward in the field of natural language planning. By leveraging the strengths of both LLMs and classical planners, the authors have developed a method that can generate accurate PDDL task definitions from natural language inputs, paving the way for more accessible and user-friendly planning systems.

While the paper raises some questions about the approach's limitations and performance compared to other methods, the core ideas behind the TIC approach are promising and could have significant implications for the development of planning-aware techniques that can bridge the gap between natural language and formal planning representations. As the field of large language models for planning continues to evolve, this research provides a valuable contribution to our understanding of how these powerful language models can be effectively integrated into real-world planning applications.