Time Complexity of Broadcast and Consensus for Randomized Oblivious Message Adversaries

Read original: arXiv:2302.11988 - Published 8/21/2024 by Antoine El-Hayek, Monika Henzinger, Stefan Schmid
Total Score

0

🐍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Broadcast and consensus are fundamental tasks in distributed computing.
  • These tasks are challenging in dynamic networks with unreliable communication.
  • Previous work has found high time complexity lower bounds for these tasks, even in simple network topologies.
  • This paper explores a randomized oblivious message adversary model, which may better reflect real-world stochastic processes.

Plain English Explanation

In distributed computing systems, broadcast and consensus are critical tasks. Broadcast involves spreading information to all nodes in the network, while consensus is the process of all nodes agreeing on a common value. These tasks can be very difficult in dynamic networks, where the connections between nodes may be unreliable due to factors like device mobility or system failures.

Previous research has found that even in simple network topologies, like tree structures, there are limits on how quickly these tasks can be completed. The worst-case, or most challenging, scenarios have been the focus of much of this work, leading to high time complexity lower bounds - meaning the minimum time required scales linearly with the number of nodes.

However, the authors of this paper argue that the worst-case, adversarial models used in this prior work may be overly conservative. Many real-world distributed processes are actually stochastic in nature, rather than following a strict worst-case pattern. To explore this, the paper introduces a randomized oblivious message adversary model.

This model is inspired by the SI (Susceptible-Infected) model used in epidemiology, but applied to tree-structured communication networks. The key insight is that if information dissemination occurs along random trees, rather than adversarially-chosen networks, both broadcast and consensus can complete much faster - in logarithmic time rather than linear time.

Technical Explanation

The paper first considers the completely random case, where in each round the communication network is chosen uniformly at random from all possible rooted trees. It then introduces the randomized oblivious message adversary model, where in each round the adversary can choose a set of k edges to appear, and then a rooted tree is selected uniformly at random from the set of all trees containing those edges.

The authors show that under this randomized model, broadcast completes in O(k + log n) rounds, where n is the number of nodes. For consensus, the same logarithmic time bound holds as long as k ≤ 0.1n. This is a significant improvement over the linear time lower bounds found in prior work on adversarial models.

The key to this improved performance is the independent dissemination of information along the random trees. The paper provides a formal analysis proving the independence of a critical variable, which enables a deeper understanding of the information spread process.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes an important contribution by exploring a more realistic stochastic model for dynamic networks, rather than relying solely on worst-case adversarial models. By capturing the inherent randomness present in many real-world distributed systems, the authors demonstrate that significantly faster broadcast and consensus protocols are possible.

However, the model still has some limitations. While the randomized oblivious adversary is more flexible than a strict adversarial model, it may not fully capture the complexities of real-world network dynamics. Additionally, the focus on tree-structured networks, while analytically tractable, may not reflect the topologies encountered in practice.

Further research could explore relaxing some of these assumptions, such as by considering more general network structures or adversaries with additional capabilities. Empirical validation of the model's applicability to real-world scenarios would also strengthen the practical relevance of the findings.

Conclusion

This paper takes an important step towards understanding broadcast and consensus in more realistic stochastic models of dynamic distributed networks. By introducing a randomized oblivious adversary, the authors demonstrate that these fundamental tasks can be completed much faster than previously thought, with logarithmic time complexity bounds. This work highlights the value of exploring alternative models that better capture the inherent randomness present in many real-world distributed systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

Total Score

0

Time Complexity of Broadcast and Consensus for Randomized Oblivious Message Adversaries

Antoine El-Hayek, Monika Henzinger, Stefan Schmid

Broadcast and consensus are most fundamental tasks in distributed computing. These tasks are particularly challenging in dynamic networks where communication across the network links may be unreliable, e.g., due to mobility or failures. Indeed, over the last years, researchers have derived several impossibility results and high time complexity lower bounds (i.e., linear in the number of nodes $n$) for these tasks, even for oblivious message adversaries where communication networks are rooted trees. However, such deterministic adversarial models may be overly conservative, as many processes in real-world settings are stochastic in nature rather than worst case. This paper initiates the study of broadcast and consensus on stochastic dynamic networks, introducing a randomized oblivious message adversary. Our model is reminiscent of the SI model in epidemics, however, revolving around trees (which renders the analysis harder due to the apparent lack of independence). In particular, we show that if information dissemination occurs along random rooted trees, broadcast and consensus complete fast with high probability, namely in logarithmic time. Our analysis proves the independence of a key variable, which enables a formal understanding of the dissemination process. More formally, for a network with $n$ nodes, we first consider the completely random case where in each round the communication network is chosen uniformly at random among rooted trees. We then introduce the notion of randomized oblivious message adversary, where in each round, an adversary can choose $k$ edges to appear in the communication network, and then a rooted tree is chosen uniformly at random among the set of all rooted trees that include these edges. We show that broadcast completes in $O(k+log n)$ rounds, and that this it is also the case for consensus as long as $k le 0.1n$.

Read more

8/21/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Nearly-Optimal Consensus Tolerating Adaptive Omissions: Why is a Lot of Randomness is Needed?

Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Jan Olkowski

We study the problem of reaching agreement in a synchronous distributed system by $n$ autonomous parties, when the communication links from/to faulty parties can omit messages. The faulty parties are selected and controlled by an adaptive, full-information, computationally unbounded adversary. We design a randomized algorithm that works in $O(sqrt{n}log^2 n)$ rounds and sends $O(n^2log^3 n)$ communication bits, where the number of faulty parties is $Theta(n)$. Our result is simultaneously tight for both these measures within polylogarithmic factors: due to the $Omega(n^2)$ lower bound on communication by Abraham et al. (PODC'19) and $Omega(sqrt{n/log n})$ lower bound on the number of rounds by Bar-Joseph and Ben-Or (PODC'98). We also quantify how much randomness is necessary and sufficient to reduce time complexity to a certain value, while keeping the communication complexity (nearly) optimal. We prove that no MC algorithm can work in less than $Omega(frac{n^2}{max{R,n}log n})$ rounds if it uses less than $O(R)$ calls to a random source, assuming a constant fraction of faulty parties. This can be contrasted with a long line of work on consensus against an {em adversary limited to polynomial computation time}, thus unable to break cryptographic primitives, culminating in a work by Ghinea et al. (EUROCRYPT'22), where an optimal $O(r)$-round solution with probability $1-(cr)^{-r}$ is given. Our lower bound strictly separates these two regimes, by excluding such results if the adversary is computationally unbounded. On the upper bound side, we show that for $Rintilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ there exists an algorithm solving consensus in $tilde{O}(frac{n^2}{R})$ rounds with high probability, where tilde notation hides a polylogarithmic factor. The communication complexity of the algorithm does not depend on the amount of randomness $R$ and stays optimal within polylogarithmic factor.

Read more

5/27/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Fast Broadcast in Highly Connected Networks

Shashwat Chandra, Yi-Jun Chang, Michal Dory, Mohsen Ghaffari, Dean Leitersdorf

We revisit the classic broadcast problem, wherein we have $k$ messages, each composed of $O(log{n})$ bits, distributed arbitrarily across a network. The objective is to broadcast these messages to all nodes in the network. In the distributed CONGEST model, a textbook algorithm solves this problem in $O(D+k)$ rounds, where $D$ is the diameter of the graph. While the $O(D)$ term in the round complexity is unavoidable$unicode{x2014}$given that $Omega(D)$ rounds are necessary to solve broadcast in any graph$unicode{x2014}$it remains unclear whether the $O(k)$ term is needed in all graphs. In cases where the minimum cut size is one, simply transmitting messages from one side of the cut to the other would require $Omega(k)$ rounds. However, if the size of the minimum cut is larger, it may be possible to develop faster algorithms. This motivates the exploration of the broadcast problem in networks with high edge connectivity. In this work, we present a simple randomized distributed algorithm for performing $k$-message broadcast in $O(((n+k)/lambda)log n)$ rounds in any $n$-node simple graph with edge connectivity $lambda$. When $k = Omega(n)$, our algorithm is universally optimal, up to an $O(log n)$ factor, as its complexity nearly matches an information-theoretic $Omega(k/lambda)$ lower bound that applies to all graphs, even when the network topology is known to the algorithm. The setting $k = Omega(n)$ is particularly interesting because several fundamental problems can be reduced to broadcasting $Omega(n)$ messages. Our broadcast algorithm finds several applications in distributed computing, enabling $O(1)$-approximation for all distances and $(1+epsilon)$-approximation for all cut sizes in $tilde{O}(n/lambda)$ rounds.

Read more

4/22/2024

Memory Lower Bounds and Impossibility Results for Anonymous Dynamic Broadcast
Total Score

0

Memory Lower Bounds and Impossibility Results for Anonymous Dynamic Broadcast

Garrett Parzych, Joshua J. Daymude

Broadcast is a ubiquitous distributed computing problem that underpins many other system tasks. In static, connected networks, it was recently shown that broadcast is solvable without any node memory and only constant-size messages in worst-case asymptotically optimal time (Hussak and Trehan, PODC'19/STACS'20/DC'23). In the dynamic setting of adversarial topology changes, however, existing algorithms rely on identifiers, port labels, or polynomial memory to solve broadcast and compute functions over node inputs. We investigate space-efficient, terminating broadcast algorithms for anonymous, synchronous, 1-interval connected dynamic networks and introduce the first memory lower bounds in this setting. Specifically, we prove that broadcast with termination detection is impossible for idle-start algorithms (where only the broadcaster can initially send messages) and otherwise requires $Omega(log n)$ memory per node, where $n$ is the number of nodes in the network. Even if the termination condition is relaxed to stabilizing termination (eventually no additional messages are sent), we show that any idle-start algorithm must use $omega(1)$ memory per node, separating the static and dynamic settings for anonymous broadcast. This lower bound is not far from optimal, as we present an algorithm that solves broadcast with stabilizing termination using $mathcal{O}(log n)$ memory per node in worst-case asymptotically optimal time. In sum, these results reveal the necessity of non-constant memory for nontrivial terminating computation in anonymous dynamic networks.

Read more

7/16/2024