On the Limits of Information Spread by Memory-less Agents
2402.11553
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
We address the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, designed to capture the challenges of spreading information and reaching consensus among entities with minimal cognitive and communication capacities. Specifically, a group of $n$ agents is required to adopt the correct opinion, initially held by a single informed individual, choosing from two possible opinions. In order to make decisions, agents are restricted to observing the opinions of a few randomly sampled agents, and lack the ability to communicate further and to identify the informed individual. Additionally, agents cannot retain any information from one round to the next. According to a recent publication in SODA (2024), a logarithmic convergence time without memory is achievable in the parallel setting (where agents are updated simultaneously), as long as the number of samples is at least $Omega(sqrt{n log n})$. However, determining the minimal sample size for an efficient protocol to exist remains a challenging open question. As a preliminary step towards an answer, we establish the first lower bound for this problem in the parallel setting. Specifically, we demonstrate that it is impossible for any memory-less protocol with constant sample size, to converge with high probability in less than an almost-linear number of rounds. This lower bound holds even when agents are aware of both the exact value of $n$ and their own opinion, and encompasses various simple existing dynamics designed to achieve consensus. Beyond the bit-dissemination problem, our result sheds light on the convergence time of the minority dynamics, the counterpart of the well-known majority rule, whose chaotic behavior is yet to be fully understood despite the apparent simplicity of the algorithm.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper addresses the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, which involves a group of agents trying to reach consensus on the correct opinion held by a single informed individual
- Agents have limited cognitive and communication abilities, and cannot retain information from one round to the next
- The paper establishes a lower bound for the minimal sample size required for an efficient memory-less protocol to converge in the parallel setting, even when agents are aware of the group size and their own opinion
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a problem where a group of agents, each with limited capabilities, need to figure out and agree on the correct opinion that is initially held by only one individual in the group. The agents can only observe the opinions of a few randomly selected other agents, and they cannot communicate further or remember anything from one round to the next.
Previous research has shown that if the number of samples the agents can observe is at least !linkฮฉ(โn log n)[/link], then the system can converge to the correct opinion in a logarithmic number of rounds, even without any memory. However, determining the minimum sample size required for an efficient protocol to exist is still an open problem.
This paper establishes the first lower bound for this problem in the parallel setting, where all agents are updated simultaneously. The authors show that it is impossible for any memory-less protocol with a constant sample size to converge with high probability in less than an almost-linear number of rounds, even when the agents know the exact group size and their own opinion.
Beyond the bit-dissemination problem, this result also sheds light on the !linkminority dynamics[/link], which is the opposite of the well-known majority rule. The chaotic behavior of minority dynamics is not yet fully understood, despite the apparent simplicity of the algorithm.
Technical Explanation
The paper focuses on the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, which aims to capture the challenges of spreading information and reaching consensus among entities with minimal cognitive and communication capacities. In this problem, a group of n agents is required to adopt the correct opinion, initially held by a single informed individual, choosing from two possible opinions.
Agents are restricted to observing the opinions of a few randomly sampled agents, and lack the ability to communicate further and to identify the informed individual. Additionally, agents cannot retain any information from one round to the next.
Previous research has shown that in the parallel setting, where agents are updated simultaneously, a logarithmic convergence time without memory is achievable, as long as the number of samples is at least !linkฮฉ(โn log n)[/link]. However, determining the minimal sample size for an efficient protocol to exist remains a challenging open question.
As a preliminary step towards an answer, this paper establishes the first lower bound for this problem in the parallel setting. Specifically, the authors demonstrate that it is impossible for any memory-less protocol with constant sample size to converge with high probability in less than an almost-linear number of rounds. This lower bound holds even when agents are aware of both the exact value of n and their own opinion, and encompasses various simple existing dynamics designed to achieve consensus.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides an important lower bound for the minimal sample size required for an efficient memory-less protocol to converge in the parallel setting of the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem. This result highlights the inherent challenges in designing protocols that can quickly reach consensus with limited resources.
One potential limitation of the research is that the lower bound is established only for the parallel setting, and it remains an open question whether similar lower bounds hold in the sequential or asynchronous settings. !linkInvestigating the convergence time in these alternative settings could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the problem[/link].
Additionally, the authors mention that their result sheds light on the minority dynamics, but do not provide a detailed analysis of how the lower bound relates to this problem. !linkFurther exploration of the connection between bit-dissemination and minority dynamics could yield additional insights[/link].
Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the understanding of the fundamental limitations in self-stabilizing distributed systems with minimal cognitive and communication capabilities. The results presented here can inform the design of more efficient protocols for reaching consensus in such environments.
Conclusion
This paper addresses the self-stabilizing bit-dissemination problem, which involves a group of agents with limited cognitive and communication abilities trying to reach consensus on the correct opinion held by a single informed individual. The authors establish the first lower bound for the minimal sample size required for an efficient memory-less protocol to converge in the parallel setting, even when agents are aware of the group size and their own opinion.
The results shed light on the inherent challenges in designing protocols that can quickly reach consensus with limited resources, and have implications for the study of minority dynamics, which exhibit chaotic behavior despite the apparent simplicity of the algorithm. While the lower bound is limited to the parallel setting, the insights gained from this research can inform the development of more efficient distributed systems in similar constrained environments.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐ ๏ธ
Nearly-Optimal Consensus Tolerating Adaptive Omissions: Why is a Lot of Randomness is Needed?
Mohammad T. Hajiaghayi, Dariusz R. Kowalski, Jan Olkowski
0
0
We study the problem of reaching agreement in a synchronous distributed system by $n$ autonomous parties, when the communication links from/to faulty parties can omit messages. The faulty parties are selected and controlled by an adaptive, full-information, computationally unbounded adversary. We design a randomized algorithm that works in $O(sqrt{n}log^2 n)$ rounds and sends $O(n^2log^3 n)$ communication bits, where the number of faulty parties is $Theta(n)$. Our result is simultaneously tight for both these measures within polylogarithmic factors: due to the $Omega(n^2)$ lower bound on communication by Abraham et al. (PODC'19) and $Omega(sqrt{n/log n})$ lower bound on the number of rounds by Bar-Joseph and Ben-Or (PODC'98). We also quantify how much randomness is necessary and sufficient to reduce time complexity to a certain value, while keeping the communication complexity (nearly) optimal. We prove that no MC algorithm can work in less than $Omega(frac{n^2}{max{R,n}log n})$ rounds if it uses less than $O(R)$ calls to a random source, assuming a constant fraction of faulty parties. This can be contrasted with a long line of work on consensus against an {em adversary limited to polynomial computation time}, thus unable to break cryptographic primitives, culminating in a work by Ghinea et al. (EUROCRYPT'22), where an optimal $O(r)$-round solution with probability $1-(cr)^{-r}$ is given. Our lower bound strictly separates these two regimes, by excluding such results if the adversary is computationally unbounded. On the upper bound side, we show that for $Rintilde{O}(n^{3/2})$ there exists an algorithm solving consensus in $tilde{O}(frac{n^2}{R})$ rounds with high probability, where tilde notation hides a polylogarithmic factor. The communication complexity of the algorithm does not depend on the amount of randomness $R$ and stays optimal within polylogarithmic factor.
5/27/2024
Rate Analysis of Coupled Distributed Stochastic Approximation for Misspecified Optimization
Yaqun Yang, Jinlong Lei
0
0
We consider an $n$ agents distributed optimization problem with imperfect information characterized in a parametric sense, where the unknown parameter can be solved by a distinct distributed parameter learning problem. Though each agent only has access to its local parameter learning and computational problem, they mean to collaboratively minimize the average of their local cost functions. To address the special optimization problem, we propose a coupled distributed stochastic approximation algorithm, in which every agent updates the current beliefs of its unknown parameter and decision variable by stochastic approximation method; and then averages the beliefs and decision variables of its neighbors over network in consensus protocol. Our interest lies in the convergence analysis of this algorithm. We quantitatively characterize the factors that affect the algorithm performance, and prove that the mean-squared error of the decision variable is bounded by $mathcal{O}(frac{1}{nk})+mathcal{O}left(frac{1}{sqrt{n}(1-rho_w)}right)frac{1}{k^{1.5}}+mathcal{O}big(frac{1}{(1-rho_w)^2} big)frac{1}{k^2}$, where $k$ is the iteration count and $(1-rho_w)$ is the spectral gap of the network weighted adjacency matrix. It reveals that the network connectivity characterized by $(1-rho_w)$ only influences the high order of convergence rate, while the domain rate still acts the same as the centralized algorithm. In addition, we analyze that the transient iteration needed for reaching its dominant rate $mathcal{O}(frac{1}{nk})$ is $mathcal{O}(frac{n}{(1-rho_w)^2})$. Numerical experiments are carried out to demonstrate the theoretical results by taking different CPUs as agents, which is more applicable to real-world distributed scenarios.
4/23/2024
Scale-Robust Timely Asynchronous Decentralized Learning
Purbesh Mitra, Sennur Ulukus
0
0
We consider an asynchronous decentralized learning system, which consists of a network of connected devices trying to learn a machine learning model without any centralized parameter server. The users in the network have their own local training data, which is used for learning across all the nodes in the network. The learning method consists of two processes, evolving simultaneously without any necessary synchronization. The first process is the model update, where the users update their local model via a fixed number of stochastic gradient descent steps. The second process is model mixing, where the users communicate with each other via randomized gossiping to exchange their models and average them to reach consensus. In this work, we investigate the staleness criteria for such a system, which is a sufficient condition for convergence of individual user models. We show that for network scaling, i.e., when the number of user devices $n$ is very large, if the gossip capacity of individual users scales as $Omega(log n)$, we can guarantee the convergence of user models in finite time. Furthermore, we show that the bounded staleness can only be guaranteed by any distributed opportunistic scheme by $Omega(n)$ scaling.
5/1/2024
๐
Time is not a Healer, but it Sure Makes Hindsight 20:20
Eli Gafni, Giuliano Losa
0
0
In the 1980s, three related impossibility results emerged in the field of distributed computing. First, Fischer, Lynch, and Paterson demonstrated that deterministic consensus is unattainable in an asynchronous message-passing system when a single process may crash-stop. Subsequently, Loui and Abu-Amara showed the infeasibility of achieving consensus in asynchronous shared-memory systems, given the possibility of one crash-stop failure. Lastly, Santoro and Widmayer established the impossibility of consensus in synchronous message-passing systems with a single process per round experiencing send-omission faults. In this paper, we revisit these seminal results. First, we observe that all these systems are equivalent in the sense of implementing each other. Then, we prove the impossibility of consensus in the synchronous system of Santoro and Widmayer, which is the easiest to reason about. Taking inspiration from Volzer's proof pearl and from the Borowski-Gafni simulation, we obtain a remarkably simple proof. We believe that a contemporary pedagogical approach to teaching these results should first address the equivalence of the systems before proving the consensus impossibility within the system where the result is most evident.
5/29/2024