TLDR at SemEval-2024 Task 2: T5-generated clinical-Language summaries for DeBERTa Report Analysis
2404.09136
0
0
Abstract
This paper introduces novel methodologies for the Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials (NLI4CT) task. We present TLDR (T5-generated clinical-Language summaries for DeBERTa Report Analysis) which incorporates T5-model generated premise summaries for improved entailment and contradiction analysis in clinical NLI tasks. This approach overcomes the challenges posed by small context windows and lengthy premises, leading to a substantial improvement in Macro F1 scores: a 0.184 increase over truncated premises. Our comprehensive experimental evaluation, including detailed error analysis and ablations, confirms the superiority of TLDR in achieving consistency and faithfulness in predictions against semantically altered inputs.
Create account to get full access
Introduction
This paper discusses the TLDR system, which was submitted to the SemEval-2024 Task 2 competition. The TLDR system aims to generate concise, easy-to-understand summaries of clinical reports using a T5 language model. The goal is to make complex medical information more accessible to a general audience.
Background
Transformer Architectures
Transformer architectures like T5 have shown impressive performance on a variety of natural language processing tasks. These models use attention mechanisms to capture long-range dependencies in text, allowing them to generate coherent and contextual output.
Plain English Explanation
The TLDR system takes clinical reports as input and generates short, plain-language summaries using a T5 model. The key idea is to make complex medical information easier for non-experts to understand.
The T5 model is trained on a large corpus of text data, which allows it to learn patterns and generate fluent, natural-sounding language. When given a clinical report, the TLDR system uses this trained model to produce a concise summary that captures the main points in simple terms.
This can be helpful for patients, caregivers, or others who need to understand medical information but may not have a clinical background. The summaries provide the key details without the technical jargon, making the content more accessible and understandable.
Technical Explanation
The TLDR system is built using the T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer) language model, which is a large pre-trained transformer model capable of generating human-like text. The authors fine-tuned the T5 model on a dataset of clinical reports and their associated human-written summaries.
During inference, the TLDR system takes a new clinical report as input and uses the fine-tuned T5 model to generate a concise summary. The model leverages its understanding of language and the patterns in the training data to produce a coherent, plain-language summary that captures the key points of the original report.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that the TLDR system has some limitations. The summaries may not fully capture all the nuances and details of the original reports, and there may be some biases or errors introduced by the language model. Additionally, the system's performance is dependent on the quality and coverage of the training data.
Further research could explore ways to improve the summaries, such as by incorporating domain-specific knowledge or using more advanced summarization techniques. There may also be opportunities to extend the TLDR system to other types of technical or specialized documents beyond just clinical reports.
Conclusion
Overall, the TLDR system represents an interesting approach to making complex medical information more accessible to a general audience. By leveraging the power of transformer-based language models, the system can generate concise, plain-language summaries that could be valuable for patients, caregivers, and others in need of clear, understandable medical information.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
SEME at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Comparing Masked and Generative Language Models on Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials
Mathilde Aguiar, Pierre Zweigenbaum, Nona Naderi
0
0
This paper describes our submission to Task 2 of SemEval-2024: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials. The Multi-evidence Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trial Data (NLI4CT) consists of a Textual Entailment (TE) task focused on the evaluation of the consistency and faithfulness of Natural Language Inference (NLI) models applied to Clinical Trial Reports (CTR). We test 2 distinct approaches, one based on finetuning and ensembling Masked Language Models and the other based on prompting Large Language Models using templates, in particular, using Chain-Of-Thought and Contrastive Chain-Of-Thought. Prompting Flan-T5-large in a 2-shot setting leads to our best system that achieves 0.57 F1 score, 0.64 Faithfulness, and 0.56 Consistency.
4/8/2024
SemEval-2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials
Mael Jullien, Marco Valentino, Andr'e Freitas
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are at the forefront of NLP achievements but fall short in dealing with shortcut learning, factual inconsistency, and vulnerability to adversarial inputs.These shortcomings are especially critical in medical contexts, where they can misrepresent actual model capabilities. Addressing this, we present SemEval-2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for ClinicalTrials. Our contributions include the refined NLI4CT-P dataset (i.e., Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials - Perturbed), designed to challenge LLMs with interventional and causal reasoning tasks, along with a comprehensive evaluation of methods and results for participant submissions. A total of 106 participants registered for the task contributing to over 1200 individual submissions and 25 system overview papers. This initiative aims to advance the robustness and applicability of NLI models in healthcare, ensuring safer and more dependable AI assistance in clinical decision-making. We anticipate that the dataset, models, and outcomes of this task can support future research in the field of biomedical NLI. The dataset, competition leaderboard, and website are publicly available.
4/9/2024
IITK at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Exploring the Capabilities of LLMs for Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials
Shreyasi Mandal, Ashutosh Modi
0
0
Large Language models (LLMs) have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks across multiple domains, yet they are prone to shortcut learning and factual inconsistencies. This research investigates LLMs' robustness, consistency, and faithful reasoning when performing Natural Language Inference (NLI) on breast cancer Clinical Trial Reports (CTRs) in the context of SemEval 2024 Task 2: Safe Biomedical Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials. We examine the reasoning capabilities of LLMs and their adeptness at logical problem-solving. A comparative analysis is conducted on pre-trained language models (PLMs), GPT-3.5, and Gemini Pro under zero-shot settings using Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, integrating various reasoning chains. The evaluation yields an F1 score of 0.69, consistency of 0.71, and a faithfulness score of 0.90 on the test dataset.
4/9/2024
DKE-Research at SemEval-2024 Task 2: Incorporating Data Augmentation with Generative Models and Biomedical Knowledge to Enhance Inference Robustness
Yuqi Wang, Zeqiang Wang, Wei Wang, Qi Chen, Kaizhu Huang, Anh Nguyen, Suparna De
0
0
Safe and reliable natural language inference is critical for extracting insights from clinical trial reports but poses challenges due to biases in large pre-trained language models. This paper presents a novel data augmentation technique to improve model robustness for biomedical natural language inference in clinical trials. By generating synthetic examples through semantic perturbations and domain-specific vocabulary replacement and adding a new task for numerical and quantitative reasoning, we introduce greater diversity and reduce shortcut learning. Our approach, combined with multi-task learning and the DeBERTa architecture, achieved significant performance gains on the NLI4CT 2024 benchmark compared to the original language models. Ablation studies validate the contribution of each augmentation method in improving robustness. Our best-performing model ranked 12th in terms of faithfulness and 8th in terms of consistency, respectively, out of the 32 participants.
4/16/2024