TotalSegmentator MRI: Sequence-Independent Segmentation of 59 Anatomical Structures in MR images

Read original: arXiv:2405.19492 - Published 5/31/2024 by Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Lucas K. Berger, Ashraya K. Indrakanti, Nathan Vishwanathan, Jakob Wei{ss}, Matthias Jung, Zeynep Berkarda, Alexander Rau, Marco Reisert, Thomas Kustner and 6 others
Total Score

0

🐍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Developed an open-source and easy-to-use segmentation model that can automatically and robustly segment most major anatomical structures in MR images
  • Trained the model on a diverse dataset of 298 MR scans and 227 CT scans, covering 59 anatomical structures
  • Achieved strong performance, outperforming two other publicly available segmentation models

Plain English Explanation

This study presents a new machine learning model that can automatically identify and outline different organs, bones, muscles, and blood vessels in magnetic resonance (MR) images. The researchers trained the model, called TotalSegmentator, on a large and diverse dataset of MR and CT scans, covering a wide range of body parts, ages, medical conditions, and imaging protocols.

The model was able to accurately segment 59 different anatomical structures, including organs, bones, muscles, and blood vessels. This can be useful for a variety of medical applications, such as measuring organ volumes, characterizing diseases, and planning surgical procedures.

The researchers found that their model significantly outperformed two other publicly available segmentation models, and it almost matched the performance of the original TotalSegmentator on CT images. This suggests that the model is a powerful and versatile tool for automated medical image analysis.

Technical Explanation

The researchers extended the capabilities of the TotalSegmentator model to work with MR images. They trained the nnU-Net segmentation algorithm on a dataset of 298 MR scans and 227 CT scans, covering 59 anatomical structures across 20 organs, 18 bones, 11 muscles, 7 vessels, and 3 tissue types.

The dataset was randomly sampled from routine clinical studies, representing a diverse range of ages, pathologies, scanners, body parts, imaging sequences, contrasts, echo times, repetition times, field strengths, slice thicknesses, and acquisition sites. This ensures that the model can handle a wide variety of real-world MR data.

The researchers evaluated the model's performance using Dice similarity coefficients (Dice), a metric that measures how well the model's segmentations match the ground truth. On the test set, the model achieved a Dice score of 0.824, significantly outperforming two other publicly available segmentation models (Dice scores of 0.762 and 0.542, respectively). On the CT image test set from the original TotalSegmentator paper, the model's performance was almost on par with the original TotalSegmentator (Dice score of 0.960 versus 0.970).

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that while the model performed well on a diverse range of MR data, it may not generalize perfectly to all possible MR scans. There could be some edge cases or rare pathologies that the model struggles with, and further testing and refinement may be necessary.

Additionally, the study does not provide much insight into the model's computational efficiency or deployment considerations, which could be important factors for real-world use in clinical settings. The researchers could have explored the model's inference time, memory footprint, and compatibility with different hardware and software environments.

Overall, the study presents a promising advancement in the field of automated medical image analysis, but there is still room for further research and development to ensure the model's robustness and practical applicability.

Conclusion

The researchers have developed an open-source and easy-to-use segmentation model, TotalSegmentator, that can accurately and automatically segment a wide range of anatomical structures in MR images. The model's strong performance, even on challenging real-world data, suggests it could be a valuable tool for various medical applications, such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, and surgical planning. The publicly available dataset and open-source toolkit will also contribute to further advancements in this important field of medical imaging analysis.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

Total Score

0

TotalSegmentator MRI: Sequence-Independent Segmentation of 59 Anatomical Structures in MR images

Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli, Lucas K. Berger, Ashraya K. Indrakanti, Nathan Vishwanathan, Jakob Wei{ss}, Matthias Jung, Zeynep Berkarda, Alexander Rau, Marco Reisert, Thomas Kustner, Alexandra Walter, Elmar M. Merkle, Martin Segeroth, Joshy Cyriac, Shan Yang, Jakob Wasserthal

Purpose: To develop an open-source and easy-to-use segmentation model that can automatically and robustly segment most major anatomical structures in MR images independently of the MR sequence. Materials and Methods: In this study we extended the capabilities of TotalSegmentator to MR images. 298 MR scans and 227 CT scans were used to segment 59 anatomical structures (20 organs, 18 bones, 11 muscles, 7 vessels, 3 tissue types) relevant for use cases such as organ volumetry, disease characterization, and surgical planning. The MR and CT images were randomly sampled from routine clinical studies and thus represent a real-world dataset (different ages, pathologies, scanners, body parts, sequences, contrasts, echo times, repetition times, field strengths, slice thicknesses and sites). We trained an nnU-Net segmentation algorithm on this dataset and calculated Dice similarity coefficients (Dice) to evaluate the model's performance. Results: The model showed a Dice score of 0.824 (CI: 0.801, 0.842) on the test set, which included a wide range of clinical data with major pathologies. The model significantly outperformed two other publicly available segmentation models (Dice score, 0.824 versus 0.762; p<0.001 and 0.762 versus 0.542; p<0.001). On the CT image test set of the original TotalSegmentator paper it almost matches the performance of the original TotalSegmentator (Dice score, 0.960 versus 0.970; p<0.001). Conclusion: Our proposed model extends the capabilities of TotalSegmentator to MR images. The annotated dataset (https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.11367004) and open-source toolkit (https://www.github.com/wasserth/TotalSegmentator) are publicly available.

Read more

5/31/2024

🛸

Total Score

0

MRISegmentator-Abdomen: A Fully Automated Multi-Organ and Structure Segmentation Tool for T1-weighted Abdominal MRI

Yan Zhuang, Tejas Sudharshan Mathai, Pritam Mukherjee, Brandon Khoury, Boah Kim, Benjamin Hou, Nusrat Rabbee, Abhinav Suri, Ronald M. Summers

Background: Segmentation of organs and structures in abdominal MRI is useful for many clinical applications, such as disease diagnosis and radiotherapy. Current approaches have focused on delineating a limited set of abdominal structures (13 types). To date, there is no publicly available abdominal MRI dataset with voxel-level annotations of multiple organs and structures. Consequently, a segmentation tool for multi-structure segmentation is also unavailable. Methods: We curated a T1-weighted abdominal MRI dataset consisting of 195 patients who underwent imaging at National Institutes of Health (NIH) Clinical Center. The dataset comprises of axial pre-contrast T1, arterial, venous, and delayed phases for each patient, thereby amounting to a total of 780 series (69,248 2D slices). Each series contains voxel-level annotations of 62 abdominal organs and structures. A 3D nnUNet model, dubbed as MRISegmentator-Abdomen (MRISegmentator in short), was trained on this dataset, and evaluation was conducted on an internal test set and two large external datasets: AMOS22 and Duke Liver. The predicted segmentations were compared against the ground-truth using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Normalized Surface Distance (NSD). Findings: MRISegmentator achieved an average DSC of 0.861$pm$0.170 and a NSD of 0.924$pm$0.163 in the internal test set. On the AMOS22 dataset, MRISegmentator attained an average DSC of 0.829$pm$0.133 and a NSD of 0.908$pm$0.067. For the Duke Liver dataset, an average DSC of 0.933$pm$0.015 and a NSD of 0.929$pm$0.021 was obtained. Interpretation: The proposed MRISegmentator provides automatic, accurate, and robust segmentations of 62 organs and structures in T1-weighted abdominal MRI sequences. The tool has the potential to accelerate research on various clinical topics, such as abnormality detection, radiotherapy, disease classification among others.

Read more

6/26/2024

↗️

Total Score

0

MRSegmentator: Robust Multi-Modality Segmentation of 40 Classes in MRI and CT Sequences

Hartmut Hantze, Lina Xu, Felix J. Dorfner, Leonhard Donle, Daniel Truhn, Hugo Aerts, Mathias Prokop, Bram van Ginneken, Alessa Hering, Lisa C. Adams, Keno K. Bressem

Purpose: To introduce a deep learning model capable of multi-organ segmentation in MRI scans, offering a solution to the current limitations in MRI analysis due to challenges in resolution, standardized intensity values, and variability in sequences. Materials and Methods: he model was trained on 1,200 manually annotated MRI scans from the UK Biobank, 221 in-house MRI scans and 1228 CT scans, leveraging cross-modality transfer learning from CT segmentation models. A human-in-the-loop annotation workflow was employed to efficiently create high-quality segmentations. The model's performance was evaluated on NAKO and the AMOS22 dataset containing 600 and 60 MRI examinations. Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff Distance (HD) was used to assess segmentation accuracy. The model will be open sourced. Results: The model showcased high accuracy in segmenting well-defined organs, achieving Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) scores of 0.97 for the right and left lungs, and 0.95 for the heart. It also demonstrated robustness in organs like the liver (DSC: 0.96) and kidneys (DSC: 0.95 left, 0.95 right), which present more variability. However, segmentation of smaller and complex structures such as the portal and splenic veins (DSC: 0.54) and adrenal glands (DSC: 0.65 left, 0.61 right) revealed the need for further model optimization. Conclusion: The proposed model is a robust, tool for accurate segmentation of 40 anatomical structures in MRI and CT images. By leveraging cross-modality learning and interactive annotation, the model achieves strong performance and generalizability across diverse datasets, making it a valuable resource for researchers and clinicians. It is open source and can be downloaded from https://github.com/hhaentze/MRSegmentator.

Read more

5/14/2024

MSTT-199: MRI Dataset for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumor Segmentation
Total Score

0

MSTT-199: MRI Dataset for Musculoskeletal Soft Tissue Tumor Segmentation

Tahsin Reasat, Stephen Chenard, Akhil Rekulapelli, Nicholas Chadwick, Joanna Shechtel, Katherine van Schaik, David S. Smith, Joshua Lawrenz

Accurate musculoskeletal soft tissue tumor segmentation is vital for assessing tumor size, location, diagnosis, and response to treatment, thereby influencing patient outcomes. However, segmentation of these tumors requires clinical expertise, and an automated segmentation model would save valuable time for both clinician and patient. Training an automatic model requires a large dataset of annotated images. In this work, we describe the collection of an MR imaging dataset of 199 musculoskeletal soft tissue tumors from 199 patients. We trained segmentation models on this dataset and then benchmarked them on a publicly available dataset. Our model achieved the state-of-the-art dice score of 0.79 out of the box without any fine tuning, which shows the diversity and utility of our curated dataset. We analyzed the model predictions and found that its performance suffered on fibrous and vascular tumors due to their diverse anatomical location, size, and intensity heterogeneity. The code and models are available in the following github repository, https://github.com/Reasat/mstt

Read more

9/6/2024