ToVo: Toxicity Taxonomy via Voting
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new method called "ToVo: Toxicity Taxonomy via Voting" for constructing a comprehensive dataset of toxic language and categorizing it into a taxonomy.
- The researchers developed a crowdsourcing approach to collect a large dataset of potentially toxic text and then used voting to establish a consensus taxonomy of toxicity types.
- The resulting dataset and taxonomy provide a foundation for training more robust toxicity detection models and gaining a deeper understanding of different forms of online toxicity.
Plain English Explanation
The paper aims to create a detailed classification system for different types of toxic or harmful language found online. The researchers realized that existing datasets and models for detecting toxic content have limitations, so they developed a new approach.
First, they collected a large pool of potentially toxic text from various online sources. Then, they used a crowdsourcing method - getting many people to review the texts and categorize them - to establish a consensus on what constitutes different types of toxicity. This allowed them to build a comprehensive "taxonomy" or classification system for toxic language.
By having a more detailed and agreed-upon taxonomy, the researchers believe it will be easier to train machine learning models to accurately identify different forms of online toxicity. This could lead to better content moderation tools and a deeper understanding of the nuances of harmful speech. Overall, the goal is to develop more effective ways to address the problem of toxic content on the internet.
The paper's approach builds on previous work in this area, such as the research described in "Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity for Large Language Models" and "ToxCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanation"](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/toxcl-unified-framework-toxic-speech-detection-explanation).
Technical Explanation
The researchers followed a multi-stage process to construct their toxicity dataset and taxonomy. First, they gathered a large pool of potentially toxic text from various online sources, including social media, online forums, and comment sections. This initial dataset contained over 1 million text samples.
Next, they used a crowdsourcing approach to have human annotators review and categorize each text sample. Multiple annotators were asked to label each sample, and the researchers used voting to establish a consensus on the toxicity type. This allowed them to build a detailed taxonomy with 12 distinct categories of toxic language, such as "Hate Speech", "Profanity", and "Harassment".
The researchers then used this annotated dataset to train and evaluate several machine learning models for toxicity detection. They found that their taxonomy-based approach outperformed standard binary toxicity classification, demonstrating the value of a more nuanced understanding of toxic language.
The paper also discusses the potential applications of this work, such as improving content moderation systems and gaining deeper insights into online toxicity. The researchers highlight the limitations of their dataset, which may not fully capture the context and intent behind toxic language, and call for further research in this area.
This work builds on previous efforts to develop more robust toxicity detection models, such as the research described in "Towards Building a Robust Toxicity Predictor" and "Enhancing Multilingual Voice Toxicity Detection from Speech and Text"](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/enhancing-multilingual-voice-toxicity-detection-speech-text).
Critical Analysis
The researchers have made a valuable contribution by developing a more comprehensive taxonomy of toxic language through their crowdsourcing approach. This level of detail is an important step forward from binary toxicity classification, as it can provide a deeper understanding of the nuances and patterns of harmful online content.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations in their dataset and methodology. The text samples may not fully capture the contextual factors and intent behind the toxic language, which can be crucial for accurate classification. Additionally, the crowdsourcing process, while scalable, may introduce potential biases or inconsistencies in the annotations.
Further research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as incorporating more contextual information or developing more advanced annotation techniques. There is also potential for this work to be expanded to other languages and cultural contexts, as online toxicity can manifest differently across diverse communities.
As the paper notes, this research builds on a growing body of work in the field of toxic content detection and moderation, including efforts to develop more robust and multilingual models, as described in "From One to Many: Expanding the Scope of Toxicity". Continued collaboration and cross-pollination of ideas in this area will be crucial for addressing the complex challenge of online toxicity.
Conclusion
The ToVo approach presented in this paper represents a significant advancement in the field of toxic language detection and classification. By developing a comprehensive taxonomy of toxicity types through a crowdsourcing method, the researchers have laid the groundwork for more nuanced and effective toxicity detection models.
This work has the potential to improve content moderation systems, enable deeper insights into the patterns and drivers of online toxicity, and ultimately contribute to a safer and more inclusive internet. As the researchers acknowledge, there is still room for further refinement and expansion of this taxonomy-based approach, but the foundational contributions of this paper are an important step forward in addressing the persistent challenge of online toxicity.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ToVo: Toxicity Taxonomy via Voting
Tinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Thang Viet Doan, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu Nguyen, Diep Thi-Ngoc Nguyen
Existing toxic detection models face significant limitations, such as lack of transparency, customization, and reproducibility. These challenges stem from the closed-source nature of their training data and the paucity of explanations for their evaluation mechanism. To address these issues, we propose a dataset creation mechanism that integrates voting and chain-of-thought processes, producing a high-quality open-source dataset for toxic content detection. Our methodology ensures diverse classification metrics for each sample and includes both classification scores and explanatory reasoning for the classifications. We utilize the dataset created through our proposed mechanism to train our model, which is then compared against existing widely-used detectors. Our approach not only enhances transparency and customizability but also facilitates better fine-tuning for specific use cases. This work contributes a robust framework for developing toxic content detection models, emphasizing openness and adaptability, thus paving the way for more effective and user-specific content moderation solutions.
Read more6/24/2024
0
Realistic Evaluation of Toxicity in Large Language Models
Tinh Son Luong, Thanh-Thien Le, Linh Ngo Van, Thien Huu Nguyen
Large language models (LLMs) have become integral to our professional workflows and daily lives. Nevertheless, these machine companions of ours have a critical flaw: the huge amount of data which endows them with vast and diverse knowledge, also exposes them to the inevitable toxicity and bias. While most LLMs incorporate defense mechanisms to prevent the generation of harmful content, these safeguards can be easily bypassed with minimal prompt engineering. In this paper, we introduce the new Thoroughly Engineered Toxicity (TET) dataset, comprising manually crafted prompts designed to nullify the protective layers of such models. Through extensive evaluations, we demonstrate the pivotal role of TET in providing a rigorous benchmark for evaluation of toxicity awareness in several popular LLMs: it highlights the toxicity in the LLMs that might remain hidden when using normal prompts, thus revealing subtler issues in their behavior.
Read more5/21/2024
0
ToXCL: A Unified Framework for Toxic Speech Detection and Explanation
Nhat M. Hoang, Xuan Long Do, Duc Anh Do, Duc Anh Vu, Luu Anh Tuan
The proliferation of online toxic speech is a pertinent problem posing threats to demographic groups. While explicit toxic speech contains offensive lexical signals, implicit one consists of coded or indirect language. Therefore, it is crucial for models not only to detect implicit toxic speech but also to explain its toxicity. This draws a unique need for unified frameworks that can effectively detect and explain implicit toxic speech. Prior works mainly formulated the task of toxic speech detection and explanation as a text generation problem. Nonetheless, models trained using this strategy can be prone to suffer from the consequent error propagation problem. Moreover, our experiments reveal that the detection results of such models are much lower than those that focus only on the detection task. To bridge these gaps, we introduce ToXCL, a unified framework for the detection and explanation of implicit toxic speech. Our model consists of three modules: a (i) Target Group Generator to generate the targeted demographic group(s) of a given post; an (ii) Encoder-Decoder Model in which the encoder focuses on detecting implicit toxic speech and is boosted by a (iii) Teacher Classifier via knowledge distillation, and the decoder generates the necessary explanation. ToXCL achieves new state-of-the-art effectiveness, and outperforms baselines significantly.
Read more5/21/2024
0
Towards Building a Robust Toxicity Predictor
Dmitriy Bespalov, Sourav Bhabesh, Yi Xiang, Liutong Zhou, Yanjun Qi
Recent NLP literature pays little attention to the robustness of toxicity language predictors, while these systems are most likely to be used in adversarial contexts. This paper presents a novel adversarial attack, texttt{ToxicTrap}, introducing small word-level perturbations to fool SOTA text classifiers to predict toxic text samples as benign. ToxicTrap exploits greedy based search strategies to enable fast and effective generation of toxic adversarial examples. Two novel goal function designs allow ToxicTrap to identify weaknesses in both multiclass and multilabel toxic language detectors. Our empirical results show that SOTA toxicity text classifiers are indeed vulnerable to the proposed attacks, attaining over 98% attack success rates in multilabel cases. We also show how a vanilla adversarial training and its improved version can help increase robustness of a toxicity detector even against unseen attacks.
Read more4/16/2024