Towards Better Benchmark Datasets for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion
2406.11898
0
0
Abstract
Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) attempts to predict missing facts in a Knowledge Graph (KG). Recently, there's been an increased focus on designing KGC methods that can excel in the {it inductive setting}, where a portion or all of the entities and relations seen in inference are unobserved during training. Numerous benchmark datasets have been proposed for inductive KGC, all of which are subsets of existing KGs used for transductive KGC. However, we find that the current procedure for constructing inductive KGC datasets inadvertently creates a shortcut that can be exploited even while disregarding the relational information. Specifically, we observe that the Personalized PageRank (PPR) score can achieve strong or near SOTA performance on most inductive datasets. In this paper, we study the root cause of this problem. Using these insights, we propose an alternative strategy for constructing inductive KGC datasets that helps mitigate the PPR shortcut. We then benchmark multiple popular methods using the newly constructed datasets and analyze their performance. The new benchmark datasets help promote a better understanding of the capabilities and challenges of inductive KGC by removing any shortcuts that obfuscate performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper "Towards Better Benchmark Datasets for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion" discusses the limitations of existing knowledge graph (KG) benchmark datasets and proposes a new dataset called IKGC-22 to better evaluate inductive KG completion methods.
- Inductive KG completion refers to the task of predicting missing links in a KG when new entities are introduced, which is an important capability for real-world applications.
- The authors argue that current benchmark datasets have biases that can lead to overly optimistic performance evaluations of inductive KG models, and they introduce IKGC-22 to address these issues.
Plain English Explanation
Knowledge graphs are digital representations of information, where entities (like people, places, or concepts) are connected by relationships (like "lives in" or "founded"). Completing a knowledge graph means predicting new connections between entities that are missing.
The paper explains that existing benchmark datasets used to evaluate knowledge graph completion models have flaws that can make some models appear more effective than they really are, especially when it comes to handling new entities that weren't in the original dataset.
To address this issue, the researchers created a new benchmark dataset called IKGC-22. This dataset is designed to more accurately reflect the challenges of real-world knowledge graph completion, where new entities are constantly being added. By using IKGC-22, the authors hope that researchers will be able to develop more advanced inductive knowledge graph completion models that can effectively handle the introduction of new information.
The key insight is that current benchmarks have biases that don't reflect the true difficulty of the inductive knowledge graph completion task. IKGC-22 aims to provide a more realistic testing ground for these models, which could lead to better reasoning capabilities and more adaptable language models for knowledge graph completion.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on knowledge graph completion, highlighting the distinction between transductive and inductive settings. In the transductive setting, all entities are observed during training, while the inductive setting introduces new entities at test time.
The authors then analyze the limitations of existing benchmark datasets, such as WN18RR, FB15k-237, and NELL-995. They demonstrate that these datasets exhibit biases that make the inductive task artificially easier, such as having a high overlap between training and test entities, or having a large number of "singleton" entities (entities that only appear in one fact).
To address these issues, the researchers introduce a new benchmark called IKGC-22. IKGC-22 is constructed to have lower entity overlap between training and test sets, as well as a more realistic distribution of singleton entities. The authors also ensure that the test set includes challenging queries that require reasoning about new entities.
The paper shows that state-of-the-art inductive KG completion models perform significantly worse on IKGC-22 compared to the existing benchmarks, indicating that the new dataset provides a more realistic and challenging evaluation of these methods.
Critical Analysis
The authors acknowledge that IKGC-22 is not a perfect benchmark, as it still has some biases and limitations. For example, the dataset only focuses on a single domain (movies), and the distribution of entity and relation types may not reflect real-world knowledge graphs.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the performance of different inductive KG completion methods on IKGC-22. It would be helpful to see a more in-depth comparison of various approaches to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of the current state of the art.
There are also open questions about the extent to which pre-trained language models can effectively learn and reason about new entities in a knowledge graph, which the paper does not fully address.
Despite these limitations, the IKGC-22 dataset represents an important step towards more realistic and challenging benchmarks for inductive KG completion. Continued efforts to improve benchmark design and evaluation of inductive reasoning capabilities will be crucial for driving progress in this field.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the limitations of existing knowledge graph completion benchmarks and introduces a new dataset, IKGC-22, to better evaluate inductive KG completion methods. The authors demonstrate that IKGC-22 provides a more realistic and challenging testing ground for these models, which could lead to the development of more advanced inductive reasoning techniques and improved performance on real-world knowledge graph completion tasks. While IKGC-22 is not without its own limitations, it represents an important step towards better benchmark design and more robust evaluation of inductive KG completion capabilities.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Progressive Knowledge Graph Completion
Jiayi Li, Ruilin Luo, Jiaqi Sun, Jing Xiao, Yujiu Yang
0
0
Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) has emerged as a promising solution to address the issue of incompleteness within Knowledge Graphs (KGs). Traditional KGC research primarily centers on triple classification and link prediction. Nevertheless, we contend that these tasks do not align well with real-world scenarios and merely serve as surrogate benchmarks. In this paper, we investigate three crucial processes relevant to real-world construction scenarios: (a) the verification process, which arises from the necessity and limitations of human verifiers; (b) the mining process, which identifies the most promising candidates for verification; and (c) the training process, which harnesses verified data for subsequent utilization; in order to achieve a transition toward more realistic challenges. By integrating these three processes, we introduce the Progressive Knowledge Graph Completion (PKGC) task, which simulates the gradual completion of KGs in real-world scenarios. Furthermore, to expedite PKGC processing, we propose two acceleration modules: Optimized Top-$k$ algorithm and Semantic Validity Filter. These modules significantly enhance the efficiency of the mining procedure. Our experiments demonstrate that performance in link prediction does not accurately reflect performance in PKGC. A more in-depth analysis reveals the key factors influencing the results and provides potential directions for future research.
4/16/2024
Query-Enhanced Adaptive Semantic Path Reasoning for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion
Kai Sun, Jiapu Wang, Huajie Jiang, Yongli Hu, Baocai Yin
0
0
Conventional Knowledge graph completion (KGC) methods aim to infer missing information in incomplete Knowledge Graphs (KGs) by leveraging existing information, which struggle to perform effectively in scenarios involving emerging entities. Inductive KGC methods can handle the emerging entities and relations in KGs, offering greater dynamic adaptability. While existing inductive KGC methods have achieved some success, they also face challenges, such as susceptibility to noisy structural information during reasoning and difficulty in capturing long-range dependencies in reasoning paths. To address these challenges, this paper proposes the Query-Enhanced Adaptive Semantic Path Reasoning (QASPR) framework, which simultaneously captures both the structural and semantic information of KGs to enhance the inductive KGC task. Specifically, the proposed QASPR employs a query-dependent masking module to adaptively mask noisy structural information while retaining important information closely related to the targets. Additionally, QASPR introduces a global semantic scoring module that evaluates both the individual contributions and the collective impact of nodes along the reasoning path within KGs. The experimental results demonstrate that QASPR achieves state-of-the-art performance.
6/5/2024
Logical Reasoning with Relation Network for Inductive Knowledge Graph Completion
Qinggang Zhang, Keyu Duan, Junnan Dong, Pai Zheng, Xiao Huang
0
0
Inductive knowledge graph completion (KGC) aims to infer the missing relation for a set of newly-coming entities that never appeared in the training set. Such a setting is more in line with reality, as real-world KGs are constantly evolving and introducing new knowledge. Recent studies have shown promising results using message passing over subgraphs to embed newly-coming entities for inductive KGC. However, the inductive capability of these methods is usually limited by two key issues. (i) KGC always suffers from data sparsity, and the situation is even exacerbated in inductive KGC where new entities often have few or no connections to the original KG. (ii) Cold-start problem. It is over coarse-grained for accurate KG reasoning to generate representations for new entities by gathering the local information from few neighbors. To this end, we propose a novel iNfOmax RelAtion Network, namely NORAN, for inductive KG completion. It aims to mine latent relation patterns for inductive KG completion. Specifically, by centering on relations, NORAN provides a hyper view towards KG modeling, where the correlations between relations can be naturally captured as entity-independent logical evidence to conduct inductive KGC. Extensive experiment results on five benchmarks show that our framework substantially outperforms the state-of-the-art KGC methods.
6/4/2024
💬
Does Pre-trained Language Model Actually Infer Unseen Links in Knowledge Graph Completion?
Yusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Katsuhiko Hayashi, Taro Watanabe
0
0
Knowledge graphs (KGs) consist of links that describe relationships between entities. Due to the difficulty of manually enumerating all relationships between entities, automatically completing them is essential for KGs. Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC) is a task that infers unseen relationships between entities in a KG. Traditional embedding-based KGC methods, such as RESCAL, TransE, DistMult, ComplEx, RotatE, HAKE, HousE, etc., infer missing links using only the knowledge from training data. In contrast, the recent Pre-trained Language Model (PLM)-based KGC utilizes knowledge obtained during pre-training. Therefore, PLM-based KGC can estimate missing links between entities by reusing memorized knowledge from pre-training without inference. This approach is problematic because building KGC models aims to infer unseen links between entities. However, conventional evaluations in KGC do not consider inference and memorization abilities separately. Thus, a PLM-based KGC method, which achieves high performance in current KGC evaluations, may be ineffective in practical applications. To address this issue, we analyze whether PLM-based KGC methods make inferences or merely access memorized knowledge. For this purpose, we propose a method for constructing synthetic datasets specified in this analysis and conclude that PLMs acquire the inference abilities required for KGC through pre-training, even though the performance improvements mostly come from textual information of entities and relations.
6/7/2024