Does Pre-trained Language Model Actually Infer Unseen Links in Knowledge Graph Completion?

Overview

• Knowledge Graphs (KGs) are collections of linked entities and relationships between them.
• Automatically completing missing relationships in KGs, known as Knowledge Graph Completion (KGC), is an important task.
• Traditional KGC methods use only the information from training data, while recent Pre-trained Language Model (PLM)-based approaches leverage additional knowledge acquired during pre-training.
• However, the performance improvements of PLM-based KGC methods may come from memorizing textual information rather than true inference abilities.

Plain English Explanation

Knowledge Graphs are like digital maps that show how different things are connected. For example, a Knowledge Graph might show that the movie "The Matrix" was directed by the Wachowskis and starred Keanu Reeves.

Filling in the missing connections in these Knowledge Graphs automatically, called Knowledge Graph Completion, is really important. Traditional methods for this task only use the information in the training data. But newer approaches that use Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) can also draw on the general knowledge the models learned during pre-training.

The problem is that these PLM-based methods might just be recalling memorized facts, rather than actually understanding the connections between entities and being able to infer new relationships. Current evaluations don't really distinguish between memorization and true inference. So a PLM-based method that does well on standard tests might not actually be very good at the real-world task of Knowledge Graph Completion.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose a method to analyze whether PLM-based KGC models are making inferences or simply recalling memorized knowledge. They do this by creating synthetic datasets designed to test these capabilities separately.

The key insight is that if a model is truly making inferences, it should be able to generalize to new scenarios not seen during training. But if it's just memorizing facts, it will struggle with these novel situations.

By constructing datasets that isolate these two abilities, the researchers are able to assess how much of a PLM-based KGC model's performance comes from inference versus memorization. They find that while the performance gains mostly stem from the models' ability to leverage textual information about entities and relations, the PLMs do in fact acquire genuine inference capabilities through pre-training.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their synthetic datasets, while designed to isolate specific capabilities, may not fully reflect the complexity of real-world KGs. There could be additional factors at play that their analysis doesn't capture.

Additionally, the paper focuses on standard KGC evaluation metrics, which may not be the best way to assess a model's practical usefulness. Alternative retrieval-augmented approaches could provide a more holistic view of a model's suitability for Knowledge Graph Completion tasks.

Further research is needed to fully understand the extent and limitations of PLM-based KGC methods, as well as how to best evaluate their performance in realistic settings.

Conclusion

This paper provides a nuanced analysis of the capabilities of PLM-based Knowledge Graph Completion models. While these approaches can leverage a wealth of pre-trained knowledge, the researchers show that their performance gains come not just from inference abilities, but also from memorization of textual information.

This insight is important for understanding the true strengths and weaknesses of these models, and for developing more effective ways to leverage large language models for Knowledge Graph Completion and other knowledge-intensive tasks.