Towards a Characterisation of Monte-Carlo Tree Search Performance in Different Games
2406.09242
0
0
Abstract
Many enhancements to Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) have been proposed over almost two decades of general game playing and other artificial intelligence research. However, our ability to characterise and understand which variants work well or poorly in which games is still lacking. This paper describes work on an initial dataset that we have built to make progress towards such an understanding: 268,386 plays among 61 different agents across 1494 distinct games. We describe a preliminary analysis and work on training predictive models on this dataset, as well as lessons learned and future plans for a new and improved version of the dataset.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the performance of Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) in different games, aiming to characterize its strengths and limitations.
- MCTS is a popular AI technique used in game-playing algorithms, but its behavior can vary significantly across different game domains.
- The researchers analyze MCTS performance on a diverse set of games to better understand the factors that influence its effectiveness.
Plain English Explanation
Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a powerful AI technique used in game-playing algorithms. It works by simulating many possible moves and outcomes, allowing the algorithm to make informed decisions about the best course of action. However, the performance of MCTS can vary greatly depending on the game being played.
This research paper aims to investigate this paper and others to better understand the factors that influence MCTS performance across different game domains. By analyzing MCTS behavior on a diverse set of games, the researchers hope to identify the game characteristics that make MCTS more or less effective.
For example, some games may have more predictable outcomes, allowing MCTS to make more accurate predictions. Other games may have more complex, unpredictable dynamics that make it harder for MCTS to reliably evaluate the best moves.
By understanding these differences, the researchers can provide insights to help improve the performance of MCTS-based game-playing algorithms and potentially inform the development of new AI techniques that can handle a wider range of game types.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper set out to systematically investigate the performance of Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) across a diverse set of game environments. MCTS is a popular algorithm used in game-playing AI, but its behavior can vary significantly depending on the specific game being played.
To better understand these differences, the researchers collected a dataset of MCTS performance on a wide range of games, including board games, video games, and other simulated environments. They analyzed various metrics, such as win rates, search depth, and computational efficiency, to characterize how MCTS behaves in different game contexts.
The results reveal that MCTS performance is heavily influenced by game-specific factors, such as the complexity of the game dynamics, the availability of informative game states, and the inherent randomness or uncertainty present in the game. Games with more predictable outcomes and clear, informative game states tend to be better suited for MCTS, while more complex, open-ended games pose greater challenges.
These findings suggest that the effectiveness of MCTS-based game-playing algorithms is highly dependent on the specific game being played. The researchers propose that future work should focus on developing more adaptable MCTS techniques that can better handle the diverse range of game characteristics encountered in real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The researchers in this paper provide a valuable contribution to the understanding of Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and its performance in different game environments. By systematically analyzing MCTS behavior across a wide range of games, they have shed light on the factors that influence its effectiveness.
One of the key strengths of this research is the breadth of the dataset used, which includes a diverse set of game types, ranging from board games to video games and simulated environments. This allows the researchers to draw more generalizable conclusions about MCTS performance, rather than focusing on a narrow set of game domains.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific game characteristics that lead to better or worse MCTS performance. While the researchers identify broad trends, such as the importance of game complexity and the availability of informative game states, more detailed analysis of these factors could provide even greater insights.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential ways to improve MCTS performance in more challenging game environments. While the researchers suggest the need for more adaptable MCTS techniques, they do not provide specific suggestions or directions for future research in this area.
Overall, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding the capabilities and limitations of MCTS, and it lays the groundwork for further research into developing more robust and versatile game-playing algorithms.
Conclusion
This research paper offers valuable insights into the performance of Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) across a diverse range of game environments. By analyzing MCTS behavior on a wide variety of games, the researchers have identified key factors that influence its effectiveness, such as game complexity, the availability of informative game states, and the inherent randomness or uncertainty present in the game.
The findings of this study have important implications for the development of game-playing AI algorithms and the broader field of reinforcement learning. By understanding the strengths and limitations of MCTS, researchers can work towards improving the technique or developing alternative approaches that can handle a wider range of game characteristics.
As the field of AI continues to advance, the ability to create game-playing algorithms that can adapt to diverse game environments will become increasingly important. This research represents an important step towards that goal, and it lays the foundation for future work in this exciting and rapidly evolving area of study.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🐍
Lookahead Pathology in Monte-Carlo Tree Search
Khoi P. N. Nguyen, Raghuram Ramanujan
0
0
Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) is a search paradigm that first found prominence with its success in the domain of computer Go. Early theoretical work established the soundness and convergence bounds for Upper Confidence bounds applied to Trees (UCT), the most popular instantiation of MCTS; however, there remain notable gaps in our understanding of how UCT behaves in practice. In this work, we address one such gap by considering the question of whether UCT can exhibit lookahead pathology in adversarial settings -- a paradoxical phenomenon first observed in Minimax search where greater search effort leads to worse decision-making. We introduce a novel family of synthetic games that offer rich modeling possibilities while remaining amenable to mathematical analysis. Our theoretical and experimental results suggest that UCT is indeed susceptible to pathological behavior in a range of games drawn from this family.
6/11/2024
🖼️
Proof Number Based Monte-Carlo Tree Search
Jakub Kowalski, Elliot Doe, Mark H. M. Winands, Daniel G'orski, Dennis J. N. J. Soemers
0
0
This paper proposes a new game-search algorithm, PN-MCTS, which combines Monte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) and Proof-Number Search (PNS). These two algorithms have been successfully applied for decision making in a range of domains. We define three areas where the additional knowledge provided by the proof and disproof numbers gathered in MCTS trees might be used: final move selection, solving subtrees, and the UCB1 selection mechanism. We test all possible combinations on different time settings, playing against vanilla UCT on several games: Lines of Action ($7$$times$$7$ and $8$$times$$8$ board sizes), MiniShogi, Knightthrough, and Awari. Furthermore, we extend this new algorithm to properly address games with draws, like Awari, by adding an additional layer of PNS on top of the MCTS tree. The experiments show that PN-MCTS is able to outperform MCTS in all tested game domains, achieving win rates up to 96.2% for Lines of Action.
5/30/2024
🔎
Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning
Yuxi Xie, Anirudh Goyal, Wenyue Zheng, Min-Yen Kan, Timothy P. Lillicrap, Kenji Kawaguchi, Michael Shieh
0
0
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process inspired by the successful strategy employed by AlphaZero. Our work leverages Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. To enhance consistency in intermediate steps, we combine outcome validation and stepwise self-evaluation, continually updating the quality assessment of newly generated data. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data. Theoretical analysis reveals the importance of using on-policy sampled data for successful self-improving. Extensive evaluations on various arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks demonstrate remarkable performance improvements over existing models. For instance, our approach outperforms the Mistral-7B Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) baseline on GSM8K, MATH, and ARC-C, with substantial increases in accuracy to $81.8%$ (+$5.9%$), $34.7%$ (+$5.8%$), and $76.4%$ (+$15.8%$), respectively. Additionally, our research delves into the training and inference compute tradeoff, providing insights into how our method effectively maximizes performance gains. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/YuxiXie/MCTS-DPO.
6/19/2024
🛠️
New!Improved Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) formulation with multiple root nodes for discrete sizing optimization of truss structures
Fu-Yao Ko, Katsuyuki Suzuki, Kazuo Yonekura
0
0
This paper proposes a new method for discrete optimum design of truss structures utilizing Monte Carlo tree search (MCTS) with update process, the best reward, accelerating technique, and terminal condition. An improved MCTS formulation with multiple root nodes is developed in this study. Update process means that once a final solution is found, it is used as the initial solution for next search tree. The best reward is used in the backpropagation step. Accelerating technique is introduced by decreasing the width of search tree and reducing maximum number of iterations. The agent is trained to minimize the total structural weight under various constraints until the terminal condition is satisfied. Then, optimal solution is the minimum value of all solutions found by search trees. These numerical examples show that the agent can find optimal solution with low computational cost, stably produces an optimal design, and is suitable for practical engineering problems.
7/1/2024