Towards Collaborative Family-Centered Design for Online Safety, Privacy and Security
2404.03165
0
0
💬
Abstract
Traditional online safety technologies often overly restrict teens and invade their privacy, while parents often lack knowledge regarding their digital privacy. As such, prior researchers have called for more collaborative approaches on adolescent online safety and networked privacy. In this paper, we propose family-centered approaches to foster parent-teen collaboration in ensuring their mobile privacy and online safety while respecting individual privacy, to enhance open discussion and teens' self-regulation. However, challenges such as power imbalances and conflicts with family values arise when implementing such approaches, making parent-teen collaboration difficult. Therefore, attending the family-centered design workshop will provide an invaluable opportunity for us to discuss these challenges and identify best research practices for the future of collaborative online safety and privacy within families.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores a collaborative, family-centered approach to addressing online safety, privacy, and security challenges faced by families.
- It argues for moving beyond restrictive approaches that focus solely on parental control and toward more inclusive, empowering models that involve children and enable shared decision-making.
- The research highlights the need for design processes that bring together families to co-create solutions tailored to their unique needs and contexts.
Plain English Explanation
Keeping families safe and secure online is an important challenge. Traditional approaches have often relied on parents tightly controlling their children's digital activities. However, this can create tensions and limit children's ability to learn and explore online independently.
The researchers in this paper propose a different way forward - one that brings families together to jointly design online safety and privacy solutions. The idea is to move away from top-down, restrictive approaches and instead empower families to collaboratively determine the right balance of protection, autonomy, and shared responsibility.
By involving both parents and children in the design process, the researchers believe families can develop customized strategies that meet their specific needs and values. This collaborative model recognizes that online safety is a shared challenge that requires shared decision-making. It aims to foster digital literacy, trust, and open communication within the family unit.
Ultimately, the goal is to create online environments and tools that protect vulnerable users while also respecting their rights, developmental needs, and evolving digital competencies. This family-centered approach seeks to balance safety and security with personal agency and educational opportunities.
Technical Explanation
The paper makes the case for a "collaborative family-centered design" methodology to address online safety, privacy, and security challenges. The authors argue that existing approaches tend to be overly restrictive, focusing primarily on parental control mechanisms rather than empowering shared decision-making within families.
To address this gap, the researchers propose a design process that actively involves both parents and children. This participatory approach allows families to co-create customized solutions that reflect their unique needs, values, and competencies. Key elements include:
- Joint oversight: Families work together to establish appropriate boundaries, monitoring practices, and response strategies.
- Shared responsibility: Children are engaged as active stakeholders, not just passive recipients of parental rules.
- Iterative development: Families continuously refine the design based on evolving needs and emerging challenges.
The paper highlights several potential benefits of this collaborative family-centered model, including improved digital literacy, enhanced trust and communication, and more effective protection tailored to individual family circumstances.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling argument for moving beyond restrictive, top-down approaches to online safety and instead empowering families to co-create solutions. The emphasis on joint oversight, shared responsibility, and iterative development aligns well with emerging best practices in human-centered design and family-based interventions.
That said, the paper does not delve deeply into potential challenges or limitations of this collaborative model. For example, it does not address how to facilitate productive conversations and decision-making processes within families with divergent views or power dynamics. The research also does not explore how to scale such an approach beyond individual households.
Additionally, while the paper highlights the need to balance safety and security with personal agency and educational opportunities, it could benefit from a more nuanced discussion of the inherent trade-offs involved. Designing for online safety inevitably involves some constraints, and the researchers could explore how to strike the right balance through the family-centered process.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution by shifting the discourse around online safety, privacy, and security toward a more participatory, empowering model. Further research exploring the practical implementation and scalability of this collaborative family-centered approach would be a welcome next step.
Conclusion
The paper presents a compelling vision for a collaborative, family-centered approach to addressing online safety, privacy, and security challenges. By moving beyond restrictive, top-down models and instead empowering families to co-create customized solutions, this research highlights the potential to foster digital literacy, trust, and shared responsibility within the home environment.
Ultimately, the goal is to establish online ecosystems that protect vulnerable users while also respecting their rights, developmental needs, and evolving digital competencies. This family-centered design process represents a promising pathway toward more holistic, empowering strategies for navigating the complexities of the digital world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌀
From Parental Control to Joint Family Oversight: Can Parents and Teens Manage Mobile Online Safety and Privacy as Equals?
Mamtaj Akter, Amy Godfrey, Jess Kropczynski, Heather Lipford, Pamela Wisniewski
0
0
Our research aims to highlight and alleviate the complex tensions around online safety, privacy, and smartphone usage in families so that parents and teens can work together to better manage mobile privacy and security-related risks. We developed a mobile application (app) for Community Oversight of Privacy and Security (CO-oPS) and had parents and teens assess whether it would be applicable for use with their families. CO-oPS is an Android app that allows a group of users to co-monitor the apps installed on one another's devices and the privacy permissions granted to those apps. We conducted a study with 19 parent-teen (ages 13-17) pairs to understand how they currently managed mobile safety and app privacy within their family and then had them install, use, and evaluate the CO-oPS app. We found that both parents and teens gave little consideration to online safety and privacy before installing new apps or granting privacy permissions. When using CO-oPS, participants liked how the app increased transparency into one another's devices in a way that facilitated communication, but were less inclined to use features for in-app messaging or to hide apps from one another. Key themes related to power imbalances between parents and teens surfaced that made co-management challenging. Parents were more open to collaborative oversight than teens, who felt that it was not their place to monitor their parents, even though both often believed parents lacked the technological expertise to monitor themselves. Our study sheds light on why collaborative practices for managing online safety and privacy within families may be beneficial but also quite difficult to implement in practice. We provide recommendations for overcoming these challenges based on the insights gained from our study.
4/17/2024
📉
It Takes a Village: A Case for Including Extended Family Members in the Joint Oversight of Family-based Privacy and Security for Mobile Smartphones
Mamtaj Akter, Leena Alghamdi, Jess Kropczynski, Heather Lipford, Pamela Wisniewski
0
0
We conducted a user study with 19 parent-teen dyads to understand the perceived benefits and drawbacks of using a mobile app that allows them to co-manage mobile privacy, safety, and security within their families. While the primary goal of the study was to understand the use case as it pertained to parents and teens, an emerging finding from our study was that participants found value in extending app use to other family members (siblings, cousins, and grandparents). Participants felt that it would help bring the necessary expertise into their immediate family network and help protect the older adults and children of the family from privacy and security risks. However, participants expressed that co-monitoring by extended family members might cause tensions in their families, creating interpersonal conflicts. To alleviate these concerns, participants suggested more control over the privacy features to facilitate sharing their installed apps with only trusted family members.
4/17/2024
🧪
Designing Child-Centered Content Exposure and Moderation
Bel'en Sald'ias
0
0
Research on children's online experience and computer interaction often overlooks the relationship children have with hidden algorithms that control the content they encounter. Furthermore, it is not only about how children interact with targeted content but also how their development and agency are largely affected by these. By engaging with the body of literature at the intersection of i) human-centered design approaches, ii) exclusion and discrimination in A.I., iii) privacy, transparency, and accountability, and iv) children's online citizenship, this article dives into the question of How can we approach the design of a child-centered moderation process to (1) include aspects that families value for their children and (2) provide explanations for content appropriateness and removal so that we can scale (according to systems and human needs) the moderation process assisted by A.I.?. This article contributes a sociotechnical highlight of core challenges and opportunities of designing child-centered content control tools. The article concludes by grounding and characterizing design considerations for a child-centered, family-guided moderation system. We hope this work serves as a stepping stone for designers and researchers pursuing children's safety online with an eye on hidden agents controlling children's online experiences and, by extension, the values and opportunities children are exposed to.
6/13/2024
Understanding Parents' Perceptions and Practices Toward Children's Security and Privacy in Virtual Reality
Jiaxun Cao, Abhinaya S. B., Anupam Das, Pardis Emami-Naeini
0
0
Recent years have seen a sharp increase in the number of underage users in virtual reality (VR), where security and privacy (S&P) risks such as data surveillance and self-disclosure in social interaction have been increasingly prominent. Prior work shows children largely rely on parents to mitigate S&P risks in their technology use. Therefore, understanding parents' S&P knowledge, perceptions, and practices is critical for identifying the gaps for parents, technology designers, and policymakers to enhance children's S&P. While such empirical knowledge is substantial in other consumer technologies, it remains largely unknown in the context of VR. To address the gap, we conducted in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 parents of children under the age of 18 who use VR at home. Our findings highlight parents generally lack S&P awareness due to the perception that VR is still in its infancy. To protect their children's interactions with VR, parents currently primarily rely on active strategies such as verbal education about S&P. Passive strategies such as using parental controls in VR are not commonly used among our interviewees, mainly due to their perceived technical constraints. Parents also highlight that a multi-stakeholder ecosystem must be established towards more S&P support for children in VR. Based on the findings, we propose actionable S&P recommendations for critical stakeholders, including parents, educators, VR companies, and governments.
5/7/2024