Towards Complete Causal Explanation with Expert Knowledge

Read original: arXiv:2407.07338 - Published 9/12/2024 by Aparajithan Venkateswaran, Emilija Perkovi'c
Total Score

0

🔗

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper investigates the problem of restricting Markov equivalence classes of maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) when certain expert knowledge about the edges is available.
  • MAGs within a Markov equivalence class can be uniquely represented by an essential ancestral graph.
  • The researchers aim to learn the restriction of the essential ancestral graph that incorporates the proposed expert knowledge.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on a specific problem in the field of causal inference and graphical models. Causal inference is the process of understanding the relationships between variables and determining the potential effects of interventions. Graphical models, such as directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) and maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs), are commonly used to represent these causal relationships.

In this research, the authors consider the scenario where "expert knowledge" about certain edges in the MAG is available. This expert knowledge could come from domain experts or prior information about the system being studied. The researchers aim to understand how this expert knowledge can be used to restrict the set of possible causal models (i.e., the Markov equivalence class) that are consistent with the available data.

The key idea is that MAGs within the same Markov equivalence class can be uniquely represented by an "essential ancestral graph." The researchers present methods for incorporating the expert knowledge into this essential ancestral graph, effectively narrowing down the set of possible causal models. This work can be seen as a generalization of previous research on this topic, such as Meek (1995).

Technical Explanation

The paper proves several properties about the entire Markov equivalence class, including a conjecture from Ali et al. (2009). The researchers then present three sound graphical orientation rules for adding expert knowledge to an essential graph. Two of these rules generalize previously known rules, while the authors show that some orientation rules from Zhang (2008) are not needed for restricting the Markov equivalence class with expert knowledge.

The paper also provides an algorithm for incorporating the expert knowledge and shows that this algorithm is complete in certain settings, meaning that the output is a restricted essential ancestral graph. The authors conjecture that this algorithm is complete in general. For settings outside of the specified ones, the researchers provide an algorithm for checking whether a graph is a restricted essential graph and discuss its runtime.

Critical Analysis

The paper makes several valuable contributions to the field of causal inference and graphical models. By incorporating expert knowledge into the analysis of Markov equivalence classes, the researchers are able to provide a more refined and targeted understanding of the underlying causal relationships. This can be particularly useful in domains where domain experts have valuable insights that can supplement the available data.

However, the paper does not address the potential limitations or challenges of obtaining reliable expert knowledge. In practice, expert knowledge may be biased, incomplete, or even contradictory, which could introduce additional complexities and uncertainties into the analysis. The researchers could have discussed strategies for validating or reconciling expert knowledge, or for dealing with cases where the expert knowledge is uncertain or conflicting.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical and algorithmic aspects of the problem, but does not provide any empirical evaluation or case studies demonstrating the practical usefulness of the proposed methods. It would be valuable to see how these techniques perform on real-world datasets and how they compare to other approaches for causal model discovery and restriction.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach for restricting Markov equivalence classes of maximal ancestral graphs by incorporating expert knowledge. The researchers prove important properties of the Markov equivalence class, develop sound graphical orientation rules, and provide algorithms for incorporating the expert knowledge. This work extends previous research on this topic and has the potential to improve the accuracy and reliability of causal inference in domains where expert knowledge is available. However, the paper could have addressed the practical challenges of obtaining and validating expert knowledge, as well as provided empirical evaluations to demonstrate the real-world applicability of the proposed methods.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔗

Total Score

0

Towards Complete Causal Explanation with Expert Knowledge

Aparajithan Venkateswaran, Emilija Perkovi'c

We study the problem of restricting a Markov equivalence class of maximal ancestral graphs (MAGs) to only those MAGs that contain certain edge marks, which we refer to as expert knowledge. Such a restriction of the Markov equivalence class can be uniquely represented by a restricted essential ancestral graph. Our contributions are several-fold. First, we prove certain properties for the entire Markov equivalence class including a conjecture from Ali et al. (2009). Second, we present several new sound graphical orientation rules for adding expert knowledge to an essential ancestral graph. We also show that some orientation rules of Zhang (2008b) are not needed for restricting the Markov equivalence class with expert knowledge. Third, we provide an algorithm for including this expert knowledge and show that in certain settings the output of our algorithm is a restricted essential ancestral graph. Finally, outside of the specified settings, we provide an algorithm for checking whether a graph is a restricted essential graph and discuss its runtime. This work can be seen as a generalization of Meek (1995) to settings which allow for latent confounding.

Read more

9/12/2024

🌿

Total Score

0

Towards Bounding Causal Effects under Markov Equivalence

Alexis Bellot

Predicting the effect of unseen interventions is a fundamental research question across the data sciences. It is well established that in general such questions cannot be answered definitively from observational data. This realization has fuelled a growing literature introducing various identifying assumptions, for example in the form of a causal diagram among relevant variables. In practice, this paradigm is still too rigid for many practical applications as it is generally not possible to confidently delineate the true causal diagram. In this paper, we consider the derivation of bounds on causal effects given only observational data. We propose to take as input a less informative structure known as a Partial Ancestral Graph, which represents a Markov equivalence class of causal diagrams and is learnable from data. In this more ``data-driven'' setting, we provide a systematic algorithm to derive bounds on causal effects that exploit the invariant properties of the equivalence class, and that can be computed analytically. We demonstrate our method with synthetic and real data examples.

Read more

5/27/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

A Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithm for Counting Markov Equivalence Classes with the same Skeleton

Vidya Sagar Sharma

Causal DAGs (also known as Bayesian networks) are a popular tool for encoding conditional dependencies between random variables. In a causal DAG, the random variables are modeled as vertices in the DAG, and it is stipulated that every random variable is independent of its ancestors conditioned on its parents. It is possible, however, for two different causal DAGs on the same set of random variables to encode exactly the same set of conditional dependencies. Such causal DAGs are said to be Markov equivalent, and equivalence classes of Markov equivalent DAGs are known as Markov Equivalent Classes (MECs). Beautiful combinatorial characterizations of MECs have been developed in the past few decades, and it is known, in particular that all DAGs in the same MEC must have the same skeleton (underlying undirected graph) and v-structures (induced subgraph of the form $arightarrow b leftarrow c$). These combinatorial characterizations also suggest several natural algorithmic questions. One of these is: given an undirected graph $G$ as input, how many distinct Markov equivalence classes have the skeleton $G$? Much work has been devoted in the last few years to this and other closely related problems. However, to the best of our knowledge, a polynomial time algorithm for the problem remains unknown. In this paper, we make progress towards this goal by giving a fixed parameter tractable algorithm for the above problem, with the parameters being the treewidth and the maximum degree of the input graph $G$. The main technical ingredient in our work is a construction we refer to as shadow, which lets us create a local description of long-range constraints imposed by the combinatorial characterizations of MECs.

Read more

7/4/2024

Graph Knowledge Distillation to Mixture of Experts
Total Score

0

Graph Knowledge Distillation to Mixture of Experts

Pavel Rumiantsev, Mark Coates

In terms of accuracy, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are the best architectural choice for the node classification task. Their drawback in real-world deployment is the latency that emerges from the neighbourhood processing operation. One solution to the latency issue is to perform knowledge distillation from a trained GNN to a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), where the MLP processes only the features of the node being classified (and possibly some pre-computed structural information). However, the performance of such MLPs in both transductive and inductive settings remains inconsistent for existing knowledge distillation techniques. We propose to address the performance concerns by using a specially-designed student model instead of an MLP. Our model, named Routing-by-Memory (RbM), is a form of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), with a design that enforces expert specialization. By encouraging each expert to specialize on a certain region on the hidden representation space, we demonstrate experimentally that it is possible to derive considerably more consistent performance across multiple datasets.

Read more

6/19/2024