Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts

Read original: arXiv:2407.12192 - Published 9/11/2024 by Sam Yu-Te Lee, Aryaman Bahukhandi, Dongyu Liu, Kwan-Liu Ma
Total Score

0

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores dataset-scale and feature-oriented evaluation of text summarization in large language model (LLM) prompts.
  • It aims to address the lack of comprehensive evaluation approaches for text summarization in LLM prompts.
  • The researchers propose a novel evaluation framework that assesses summarization quality across diverse datasets and specific linguistic features.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive text generation capabilities, including the ability to summarize long passages of text. However, evaluating the quality of these summaries can be challenging, as current approaches often focus on limited datasets or specific summary features.

This paper presents a more comprehensive evaluation framework for text summarization in LLM prompts. The researchers developed a system that can assess summary quality across a wide range of datasets, capturing not just the overall quality but also specific linguistic features like coherence, factual accuracy, and conciseness.

By using this framework, the researchers hope to gain deeper insights into how LLMs perform on text summarization tasks and identify areas for improvement. This could lead to better-designed prompts and more effective text summarization capabilities in future LLM systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel evaluation framework for text summarization in LLM prompts, addressing the limitations of existing approaches. The framework comprises two main components:

  1. Dataset-scale Evaluation: The researchers curated a diverse set of 12 datasets covering various domains, genres, and summarization styles. This allows for comprehensive assessment of LLM summarization performance across a broad range of content.

  2. Feature-oriented Evaluation: The framework evaluates summaries based on specific linguistic features, such as coherence, factual accuracy, conciseness, and relevance. This provides detailed insights into the strengths and weaknesses of LLM summarization capabilities.

To implement this framework, the authors developed an automated evaluation pipeline that assesses summaries generated by LLMs against reference summaries. They conducted experiments using the GPT-3 language model, evaluating its performance on the curated datasets and linguistic features.

The results reveal both the strengths and limitations of GPT-3's text summarization capabilities. While the model performs well on certain features like conciseness, it struggles with others, such as factual accuracy and coherence. The paper discusses potential reasons for these performance gaps and suggests future research directions to address them.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and rigorous evaluation framework for text summarization in LLM prompts, which is a valuable contribution to the field. By assessing a wide range of datasets and linguistic features, the researchers provide a more nuanced understanding of LLM summarization capabilities.

However, the paper acknowledges that the framework has some limitations. The curated datasets may not fully capture the diversity of real-world summarization scenarios, and the automated evaluation metrics may not perfectly capture all aspects of summary quality. Additionally, the paper focuses on a single LLM (GPT-3), and evaluating other models or model families could yield different insights.

Further research could explore expanding the dataset coverage, refining the evaluation metrics, and applying the framework to a broader range of LLMs. Investigating the reasons behind the performance gaps identified in the paper, such as the challenges with factual accuracy and coherence, could also lead to important insights for improving text summarization in LLM systems.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel, comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing text summarization in LLM prompts. By considering a diverse range of datasets and linguistic features, the framework provides a more nuanced understanding of LLM summarization capabilities, highlighting both strengths and limitations.

The findings from this research can inform the development of better-designed prompts and more effective text summarization models, ultimately improving the performance of LLMs in real-world applications. The framework and insights presented in this paper represent an important step towards advancing the state of the art in text summarization using large language models.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts
Total Score

0

Towards Dataset-scale and Feature-oriented Evaluation of Text Summarization in Large Language Model Prompts

Sam Yu-Te Lee, Aryaman Bahukhandi, Dongyu Liu, Kwan-Liu Ma

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Prompt Engineering have made chatbot customization more accessible, significantly reducing barriers to tasks that previously required programming skills. However, prompt evaluation, especially at the dataset scale, remains complex due to the need to assess prompts across thousands of test instances within a dataset. Our study, based on a comprehensive literature review and pilot study, summarized five critical challenges in prompt evaluation. In response, we introduce a feature-oriented workflow for systematic prompt evaluation. In the context of text summarization, our workflow advocates evaluation with summary characteristics (feature metrics) such as complexity, formality, or naturalness, instead of using traditional quality metrics like ROUGE. This design choice enables a more user-friendly evaluation of prompts, as it guides users in sorting through the ambiguity inherent in natural language. To support this workflow, we introduce Awesum, a visual analytics system that facilitates identifying optimal prompt refinements for text summarization through interactive visualizations, featuring a novel Prompt Comparator design that employs a BubbleSet-inspired design enhanced by dimensionality reduction techniques. We evaluate the effectiveness and general applicability of the system with practitioners from various domains and found that (1) our design helps overcome the learning curve for non-technical people to conduct a systematic evaluation of summarization prompts, and (2) our feature-oriented workflow has the potential to generalize to other NLG and image-generation tasks. For future works, we advocate moving towards feature-oriented evaluation of LLM prompts and discuss unsolved challenges in terms of human-agent interaction.

Read more

9/11/2024

One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary Evaluation
Total Score

0

One Prompt To Rule Them All: LLMs for Opinion Summary Evaluation

Tejpalsingh Siledar, Swaroop Nath, Sankara Sri Raghava Ravindra Muddu, Rupasai Rangaraju, Swaprava Nath, Pushpak Bhattacharyya, Suman Banerjee, Amey Patil, Sudhanshu Shekhar Singh, Muthusamy Chelliah, Nikesh Garera

Evaluation of opinion summaries using conventional reference-based metrics rarely provides a holistic evaluation and has been shown to have a relatively low correlation with human judgments. Recent studies suggest using Large Language Models (LLMs) as reference-free metrics for NLG evaluation, however, they remain unexplored for opinion summary evaluation. Moreover, limited opinion summary evaluation datasets inhibit progress. To address this, we release the SUMMEVAL-OP dataset covering 7 dimensions related to the evaluation of opinion summaries: fluency, coherence, relevance, faithfulness, aspect coverage, sentiment consistency, and specificity. We investigate Op-I-Prompt a dimension-independent prompt, and Op-Prompts, a dimension-dependent set of prompts for opinion summary evaluation. Experiments indicate that Op-I-Prompt emerges as a good alternative for evaluating opinion summaries achieving an average Spearman correlation of 0.70 with humans, outperforming all previous approaches. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate LLMs as evaluators on both closed-source and open-source models in the opinion summarization domain.

Read more

6/11/2024

A Comparative Study of Quality Evaluation Methods for Text Summarization
Total Score

0

A Comparative Study of Quality Evaluation Methods for Text Summarization

Huyen Nguyen, Haihua Chen, Lavanya Pobbathi, Junhua Ding

Evaluating text summarization has been a challenging task in natural language processing (NLP). Automatic metrics which heavily rely on reference summaries are not suitable in many situations, while human evaluation is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a novel method based on large language models (LLMs) for evaluating text summarization. We also conducts a comparative study on eight automatic metrics, human evaluation, and our proposed LLM-based method. Seven different types of state-of-the-art (SOTA) summarization models were evaluated. We perform extensive experiments and analysis on datasets with patent documents. Our results show that LLMs evaluation aligns closely with human evaluation, while widely-used automatic metrics such as ROUGE-2, BERTScore, and SummaC do not and also lack consistency. Based on the empirical comparison, we propose a LLM-powered framework for automatically evaluating and improving text summarization, which is beneficial and could attract wide attention among the community.

Read more

7/2/2024

GRAD-SUM: Leveraging Gradient Summarization for Optimal Prompt Engineering
Total Score

0

GRAD-SUM: Leveraging Gradient Summarization for Optimal Prompt Engineering

Derek Austin, Elliott Chartock

Prompt engineering for large language models (LLMs) is often a manual time-intensive process that involves generating, evaluating, and refining prompts iteratively to ensure high-quality outputs. While there has been work on automating prompt engineering, the solutions generally are either tuned to specific tasks with given answers or are quite costly. We introduce GRAD-SUM, a scalable and flexible method for automatic prompt engineering that builds on gradient-based optimization techniques. Our approach incorporates user-defined task descriptions and evaluation criteria, and features a novel gradient summarization module to generalize feedback effectively. Our results demonstrate that GRAD-SUM consistently outperforms existing methods across various benchmarks, highlighting its versatility and effectiveness in automatic prompt optimization.

Read more

7/19/2024