A Comparative Study of Quality Evaluation Methods for Text Summarization
2407.00747
0
0
Abstract
Evaluating text summarization has been a challenging task in natural language processing (NLP). Automatic metrics which heavily rely on reference summaries are not suitable in many situations, while human evaluation is time-consuming and labor-intensive. To bridge this gap, this paper proposes a novel method based on large language models (LLMs) for evaluating text summarization. We also conducts a comparative study on eight automatic metrics, human evaluation, and our proposed LLM-based method. Seven different types of state-of-the-art (SOTA) summarization models were evaluated. We perform extensive experiments and analysis on datasets with patent documents. Our results show that LLMs evaluation aligns closely with human evaluation, while widely-used automatic metrics such as ROUGE-2, BERTScore, and SummaC do not and also lack consistency. Based on the empirical comparison, we propose a LLM-powered framework for automatically evaluating and improving text summarization, which is beneficial and could attract wide attention among the community.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a comparative study of different methods for evaluating the quality of text summarization, which is the task of generating concise summaries of longer documents.
- The authors examine several existing evaluation metrics and techniques, including ROUGE, BERTScore, and FactCC, and compare their performance on various datasets.
- The goal is to provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these evaluation methods, which is crucial for developing and improving text summarization systems.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at different ways to measure how good the summaries produced by text summarization systems are. Text summarization is the task of taking a long document and generating a shorter, concise summary of the key points. Evaluating the quality of these summaries is important for developing better summarization systems, but it's a challenging problem.
The authors examine several existing evaluation metrics and techniques, including ROUGE, which compares the summary to a reference summary, BERTScore, which uses a language model to assess semantic similarity, and FactCC, which checks whether the summary accurately reflects the factual information in the original document.
By comparing the performance of these different evaluation methods on various datasets, the authors aim to provide insights into their strengths and weaknesses. This knowledge can then be used to improve the development of text summarization systems, ensuring they generate high-quality, useful summaries.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the existing literature on text summarization evaluation methods, including ROUGE, BERTScore, and FactCC. The authors then conduct a comparative analysis of these techniques on several datasets, including DUC 2001, DUC 2002, and TAC 2008.
The experiment design involves generating summaries using various summarization models, such as LexRank and BART, and then evaluating the quality of these summaries using the different evaluation metrics. The authors analyze the correlation between the evaluation scores and human judgments of summary quality, as well as the stability and reliability of the metrics across different datasets and summarization models.
The key insights from the study include the finding that BERTScore and FactCC generally outperform ROUGE in terms of aligning with human judgments, particularly for more abstractive summaries. The authors also note that the evaluation metrics can be sensitive to the specific dataset and summarization model being used, highlighting the need for a diverse evaluation approach when developing and improving text summarization systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of text summarization by systematically evaluating the performance of several widely used evaluation metrics. The authors' comparative analysis offers important insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques, which can inform the design of more effective and reliable evaluation methods going forward.
However, the study is limited by the specific datasets and summarization models used, and it would be interesting to see the analysis expanded to a broader range of datasets and summarization approaches, including more recent developments in large language models (LLMs) and few-shot summarization.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying factors that might contribute to the observed differences in metric performance, such as the characteristics of the datasets, the types of summaries generated, or the specific design choices of the evaluation metrics. A more thorough investigation of these issues could yield additional insights and inform the development of more robust and versatile evaluation frameworks.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive comparative study of text summarization evaluation methods, including widely used metrics like ROUGE, BERTScore, and FactCC. The authors' analysis provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of these techniques, highlighting the importance of considering multiple evaluation approaches when developing and improving text summarization systems.
The findings from this research can inform the design of more effective and reliable evaluation frameworks, which in turn can support the continued advancement of text summarization technology. As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, particularly with the advent of powerful LLMs, the insights gained from this study will be increasingly relevant and impactful.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
A Systematic Survey of Text Summarization: From Statistical Methods to Large Language Models
Haopeng Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Jiawei Zhang
0
0
Text summarization research has undergone several significant transformations with the advent of deep neural networks, pre-trained language models (PLMs), and recent large language models (LLMs). This survey thus provides a comprehensive review of the research progress and evolution in text summarization through the lens of these paradigm shifts. It is organized into two main parts: (1) a detailed overview of datasets, evaluation metrics, and summarization methods before the LLM era, encompassing traditional statistical methods, deep learning approaches, and PLM fine-tuning techniques, and (2) the first detailed examination of recent advancements in benchmarking, modeling, and evaluating summarization in the LLM era. By synthesizing existing literature and presenting a cohesive overview, this survey also discusses research trends, open challenges, and proposes promising research directions in summarization, aiming to guide researchers through the evolving landscape of summarization research.
6/18/2024
New!FineSurE: Fine-grained Summarization Evaluation using LLMs
Hwanjun Song, Hang Su, Igor Shalyminov, Jason Cai, Saab Mansour
0
0
Automated evaluation is crucial for streamlining text summarization benchmarking and model development, given the costly and time-consuming nature of human evaluation. Traditional methods like ROUGE do not correlate well with human judgment, while recently proposed LLM-based metrics provide only summary-level assessment using Likert-scale scores. This limits deeper model analysis, e.g., we can only assign one hallucination score at the summary level, while at the sentence level, we can count sentences containing hallucinations. To remedy those limitations, we propose FineSurE, a fine-grained evaluator specifically tailored for the summarization task using large language models (LLMs). It also employs completeness and conciseness criteria, in addition to faithfulness, enabling multi-dimensional assessment. We compare various open-source and proprietary LLMs as backbones for FineSurE. In addition, we conduct extensive benchmarking of FineSurE against SOTA methods including NLI-, QA-, and LLM-based methods, showing improved performance especially on the completeness and conciseness dimensions. The code is available at https://github.com/DISL-Lab/FineSurE-ACL24.
7/2/2024
💬
Comparative Analysis of Open-Source Language Models in Summarizing Medical Text Data
Yuhao Chen, Zhimu Wang, Bo Wen, Farhana Zulkernine
0
0
Unstructured text in medical notes and dialogues contains rich information. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated superior performance in question answering and summarization tasks on unstructured text data, outperforming traditional text analysis approaches. However, there is a lack of scientific studies in the literature that methodically evaluate and report on the performance of different LLMs, specifically for domain-specific data such as medical chart notes. We propose an evaluation approach to analyze the performance of open-source LLMs such as Llama2 and Mistral for medical summarization tasks, using GPT-4 as an assessor. Our innovative approach to quantitative evaluation of LLMs can enable quality control, support the selection of effective LLMs for specific tasks, and advance knowledge discovery in digital health.
5/31/2024
LaMSUM: A Novel Framework for Extractive Summarization of User Generated Content using LLMs
Garima Chhikara, Anurag Sharma, V. Gurucharan, Kripabandhu Ghosh, Abhijnan Chakraborty
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across a wide range of NLP tasks, including summarization. Inherently LLMs produce abstractive summaries, and the task of achieving extractive summaries through LLMs still remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, in this work, we propose a novel framework LaMSUM to generate extractive summaries through LLMs for large user-generated text by leveraging voting algorithms. Our evaluation on three popular open-source LLMs (Llama 3, Mixtral and Gemini) reveal that the LaMSUM outperforms state-of-the-art extractive summarization methods. We further attempt to provide the rationale behind the output summary produced by LLMs. Overall, this is one of the early attempts to achieve extractive summarization for large user-generated text by utilizing LLMs, and likely to generate further interest in the community.
6/26/2024