Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Survey

2406.06391

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 6/11/2024 by Junhao Zheng, Shengjie Qiu, Chengming Shi, Qianli Ma

šŸ’¬

Abstract

As the applications of large language models (LLMs) expand across diverse fields, the ability of these models to adapt to ongoing changes in data, tasks, and user preferences becomes crucial. Traditional training methods, relying on static datasets, are increasingly inadequate for coping with the dynamic nature of real-world information. Lifelong learning, also known as continual or incremental learning, addresses this challenge by enabling LLMs to learn continuously and adaptively over their operational lifetime, integrating new knowledge while retaining previously learned information and preventing catastrophic forgetting. This survey delves into the sophisticated landscape of lifelong learning, categorizing strategies into two primary groups: Internal Knowledge and External Knowledge. Internal Knowledge includes continual pretraining and continual finetuning, each enhancing the adaptability of LLMs in various scenarios. External Knowledge encompasses retrieval-based and tool-based lifelong learning, leveraging external data sources and computational tools to extend the model's capabilities without modifying core parameters. The key contributions of our survey are: (1) Introducing a novel taxonomy categorizing the extensive literature of lifelong learning into 12 scenarios; (2) Identifying common techniques across all lifelong learning scenarios and classifying existing literature into various technique groups within each scenario; (3) Highlighting emerging techniques such as model expansion and data selection, which were less explored in the pre-LLM era. Through a detailed examination of these groups and their respective categories, this survey aims to enhance the adaptability, reliability, and overall performance of LLMs in real-world applications.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

ā€¢ This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current state of research on lifelong learning of large language models (LLMs).

ā€¢ The authors explore the key challenges and recent advancements in continual learning approaches for LLMs, with a focus on making these models more practical and usable in real-world applications.

ā€¢ The survey also covers the latest developments in tool learning for LLMs, which aims to enable these models to continuously acquire new skills and capabilities over time.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the challenge of enabling large language models (LLMs) to continually learn and expand their knowledge and capabilities over time, a process known as lifelong learning.

Imagine a powerful language model that can understand and generate human-like text. Over time, as it is exposed to more information and tasks, it should be able to continuously acquire new skills and knowledge, rather than being limited to its initial training. This would make the model much more useful and adaptable in real-world applications.

However, achieving this kind of lifelong learning in LLMs is a significant technical challenge. The paper explores the latest research on overcoming these challenges and making LLMs more practical and usable for a wide range of applications that require ongoing learning and adaptation.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current state of research on lifelong learning for large language models (LLMs). The authors examine the key challenges in enabling LLMs to continually acquire new knowledge and skills without catastrophically forgetting previously learned information.

The survey covers the latest advancements in continual learning approaches for pre-trained LLMs, including techniques like parameter isolation, replay-based methods, and meta-learning. The authors also explore research on making these continual learning approaches more practical for real-world applications.

Additionally, the paper delves into the emerging field of tool learning for LLMs, which aims to enable these models to continuously acquire new skills and capabilities over time, similar to how humans learn to use tools and solve increasingly complex problems.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and insightful overview of the current state of research on lifelong learning for large language models. However, it also acknowledges the significant challenges and limitations in this area.

For example, the authors note that many of the proposed continual learning approaches for LLMs still struggle with catastrophic forgetting, where the model forgets previously learned information when acquiring new knowledge. There are also concerns about the computational and memory overhead of these techniques, which could limit their practical applications.

Additionally, the paper highlights the need for more robust evaluation protocols and benchmarks to assess the performance and capabilities of continually learning LLMs. Without standardized testing frameworks, it can be difficult to compare the effectiveness of different approaches and measure progress in the field.

The authors also raise questions about the broader societal implications of highly adaptable and continually learning language models, such as the potential for misuse or unintended consequences. These are important considerations that deserve further exploration and discussion.

Conclusion

This paper provides a comprehensive survey of the current research on lifelong learning for large language models, a critical area of study that has significant implications for the future of AI and its real-world applications.

The authors have done an excellent job of highlighting the key challenges, recent advancements, and emerging directions in this field, such as the development of more practical and usable continual learning approaches and the promising area of tool learning for LLMs.

As the capabilities of language models continue to expand, the ability to enable them to learn and grow continuously will be essential for unlocking their full potential in a wide range of applications, from personal assistants to scientific research. This survey serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners working to advance the state of the art in this exciting and rapidly evolving field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

šŸ’¬

Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey

Haizhou Shi, Zihao Xu, Hengyi Wang, Weiyi Qin, Wenyuan Wang, Yibin Wang, Hao Wang

YC

0

Reddit

0

The recent success of large language models (LLMs) trained on static, pre-collected, general datasets has sparked numerous research directions and applications. One such direction addresses the non-trivial challenge of integrating pre-trained LLMs into dynamic data distributions, task structures, and user preferences. Pre-trained LLMs, when tailored for specific needs, often experience significant performance degradation in previous knowledge domains -- a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. While extensively studied in the continual learning (CL) community, it presents new manifestations in the realm of LLMs. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current research progress on LLMs within the context of CL. This survey is structured into four main sections: we first describe an overview of continually learning LLMs, consisting of two directions of continuity: vertical continuity (or vertical continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation from general to specific capabilities, and horizontal continuity (or horizontal continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation across time and domains (Section 3). We then summarize three stages of learning LLMs in the context of modern CL: Continual Pre-Training (CPT), Domain-Adaptive Pre-training (DAP), and Continual Fine-Tuning (CFT) (Section 4). Then we provide an overview of evaluation protocols for continual learning with LLMs, along with the current available data sources (Section 5). Finally, we discuss intriguing questions pertaining to continual learning for LLMs (Section 6). The full list of papers examined in this survey is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/llm-continual-learning-survey.

Read more

4/26/2024

Recent Advances of Foundation Language Models-based Continual Learning: A Survey

Recent Advances of Foundation Language Models-based Continual Learning: A Survey

Yutao Yang, Jie Zhou, Xuanwen Ding, Tianyu Huai, Shunyu Liu, Qin Chen, Liang He, Yuan Xie

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recently, foundation language models (LMs) have marked significant achievements in the domains of natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision (CV). Unlike traditional neural network models, foundation LMs obtain a great ability for transfer learning by acquiring rich commonsense knowledge through pre-training on extensive unsupervised datasets with a vast number of parameters. However, they still can not emulate human-like continuous learning due to catastrophic forgetting. Consequently, various continual learning (CL)-based methodologies have been developed to refine LMs, enabling them to adapt to new tasks without forgetting previous knowledge. However, a systematic taxonomy of existing approaches and a comparison of their performance are still lacking, which is the gap that our survey aims to fill. We delve into a comprehensive review, summarization, and classification of the existing literature on CL-based approaches applied to foundation language models, such as pre-trained language models (PLMs), large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs). We divide these studies into offline CL and online CL, which consist of traditional methods, parameter-efficient-based methods, instruction tuning-based methods and continual pre-training methods. Offline CL encompasses domain-incremental learning, task-incremental learning, and class-incremental learning, while online CL is subdivided into hard task boundary and blurry task boundary settings. Additionally, we outline the typical datasets and metrics employed in CL research and provide a detailed analysis of the challenges and future work for LMs-based continual learning.

Read more

5/30/2024

Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs

Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs

Jerry Huang, Prasanna Parthasarathi, Mehdi Rezagholizadeh, Sarath Chandar

YC

0

Reddit

0

Large language models (LLMs) show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But insights have suggested an inability to adjust for information or task-solving skills becoming outdated, as their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface, but LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use, as new tools can emerge and existing tools can change. Nevertheless, tools require less specialized knowledge, therefore we hypothesize they are better suited for continual learning (CL) as they rely less on parametric memory for solving tasks and instead focus on learning when to apply pre-defined tools. To verify this, we develop a synthetic benchmark and follow this by aggregating existing NLP tasks to form a more realistic testing scenario. While we demonstrate scaling model size is not a solution, regardless of tool usage, continual learning techniques can enable tool LLMs to both adapt faster while forgetting less, highlighting their potential as continual learners.

Read more

4/16/2024

Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey

Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey

Changle Qu, Sunhao Dai, Xiaochi Wei, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen

YC

0

Reddit

0

Recently, tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems. Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization, posing barriers to entry for newcomers. This gap motivates us to conduct a comprehensive survey of existing works on tool learning with LLMs. In this survey, we focus on reviewing existing literature from the two primary aspects (1) why tool learning is beneficial and (2) how tool learning is implemented, enabling a comprehensive understanding of tool learning with LLMs. We first explore the why by reviewing both the benefits of tool integration and the inherent benefits of the tool learning paradigm from six specific aspects. In terms of how, we systematically review the literature according to a taxonomy of four key stages in the tool learning workflow: task planning, tool selection, tool calling, and response generation. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of existing benchmarks and evaluation methods, categorizing them according to their relevance to different stages. Finally, we discuss current challenges and outline potential future directions, aiming to inspire both researchers and industrial developers to further explore this emerging and promising area. We also maintain a GitHub repository to continually keep track of the relevant papers and resources in this rising area at url{https://github.com/quchangle1/LLM-Tool-Survey}.

Read more

5/31/2024