Towards Objectively Benchmarking Social Intelligence for Language Agents at Action Level
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a benchmark for evaluating the social intelligence of language agents at the action level.
- The authors argue that current language model evaluations focus on language generation but do not capture important aspects of social intelligence like the ability to reason about and take appropriate actions in social situations.
- The proposed benchmark aims to objectively measure an agent's capacity for socially intelligent decision-making and behavior.
Plain English Explanation
The paper is about developing a new way to evaluate the social intelligence of AI language models. Current methods for assessing language models focus on how well they can generate human-like text, but the authors argue this doesn't capture important aspects of social intelligence, like the ability to reason about and take appropriate actions in social situations.
The researchers propose a new benchmark that would directly measure an AI agent's capacity for socially intelligent decision-making and behavior, rather than just its language generation abilities. This could be useful for developing AI systems that can engage in more natural, contextually-appropriate interactions with humans.
For example, the benchmark might present an AI agent with a scenario like a conversation where someone is upset, and test how well the agent can understand the social context and choose a helpful, empathetic response - rather than just generating fluent but potentially inappropriate language. This type of social skill training for large language models could help improve their ability to engage in more meaningful, human-like interactions.
The goal is to move beyond simply evaluating an AI's linguistic abilities and instead assess its capacity for socially intelligent reasoning and behavior - a critical component of developing AI systems that can interact with people in a more natural, contextually-aware way.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new benchmark for evaluating the social intelligence of language agents at the action level, going beyond traditional language model evaluations focused on text generation.
The authors argue that current language model benchmarks do not adequately capture important aspects of social intelligence, such as the ability to reason about and take appropriate actions in social situations. To address this, they outline a new benchmark that aims to directly measure an agent's capacity for socially intelligent decision-making and behavior.
The benchmark would present agents with various social scenarios and test their ability to select appropriate actions, rather than just evaluating language generation. This could involve scenarios like conversational interactions where someone is upset, and assessing how well the agent can understand the social context and choose a helpful, empathetic response.
The key idea is to shift the evaluation focus from linguistic fluency to socially intelligent reasoning and action. This could help drive the development of language agents that can engage in more natural, contextually-appropriate interactions with humans.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling case for the need to move beyond language model evaluations focused solely on text generation and instead assess social intelligence at the action level. This aligns with a growing recognition that developing socially intelligent AI systems requires more than just linguistic capabilities.
However, the paper does not provide details on how such a benchmark would be implemented or evaluated, leaving questions about the practical feasibility and potential limitations of this approach. Developing robust and unbiased metrics for assessing social intelligence in AI agents is a significant challenge that the paper does not fully address.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential ethical concerns around the development of such benchmarks, such as how to ensure they do not reinforce harmful stereotypes or biases. Careful consideration of the social and ethical implications of this research will be crucial as it progresses.
Overall, the paper presents an important and timely proposal for advancing the evaluation of AI social intelligence. However, significant work remains to turn this vision into a practical, responsible, and effective benchmark for the field.
Conclusion
This paper argues for the need to move beyond traditional language model evaluations and develop new benchmarks that can more directly assess the social intelligence of AI agents. The proposed approach would shift the focus from linguistic fluency to socially intelligent reasoning and decision-making, with the goal of driving the development of language agents that can engage in more natural, contextually-appropriate interactions with humans.
While the paper makes a compelling case for this shift, it leaves many open questions about the practical implementation and potential limitations of such a benchmark. Addressing these challenges and carefully considering the social and ethical implications will be crucial as this research progresses. Ultimately, the development of socially intelligent AI systems capable of meaningful human-like interactions remains a crucial and complex challenge for the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Objectively Benchmarking Social Intelligence for Language Agents at Action Level
Chenxu Wang, Bin Dai, Huaping Liu, Baoyuan Wang
Prominent large language models have exhibited human-level performance in many domains, even enabling the derived agents to simulate human and social interactions. While practical works have substantiated the practicability of grounding language agents in sandbox simulation or embodied simulators, current social intelligence benchmarks either stay at the language level or use subjective metrics. In pursuit of a more realistic and objective evaluation, we introduce the Social Tasks in Sandbox Simulation (STSS) benchmark, which assesses language agents textbf{objectively} at the textbf{action level} by scrutinizing the goal achievements within the multi-agent simulation. Additionally, we sample conversation scenarios to build a language-level benchmark to provide an economically prudent preliminary evaluation and align with prevailing benchmarks. To gauge the significance of agent architecture, we implement a target-driven planning (TDP) module as an adjunct to the existing agent. Our evaluative findings highlight that the STSS benchmark is challenging for state-of-the-art language agents. Furthermore, it effectively discriminates between distinct language agents, suggesting its usefulness as a benchmark for evaluating both language models and agent architectures.
Read more4/9/2024
0
SS-Bench: A Benchmark for Social Story Generation and Evaluation
Yi Feng, Mingyang Song, Jiaqi Wang, Zhuang Chen, Guanqun Bi, Minlie Huang, Liping Jing, Jian Yu
Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) often misunderstand social situations and struggle to participate in daily routines. Social Stories are traditionally crafted by psychology experts under strict constraints to address these challenges but are costly and limited in diversity. As Large Language Models (LLMs) advance, there's an opportunity to develop more automated, affordable, and accessible methods to generate Social Stories in real-time with broad coverage. However, adapting LLMs to meet the unique and strict constraints of Social Stories is a challenging issue. To this end, we propose textbf{SS-GEN}, a textbf{S}ocial textbf{S}tory textbf{GEN}eration framework with LLMs. Firstly, we develop a constraint-driven sophisticated strategy named textbf{textsc{StarSow}} to hierarchically prompt LLMs to generate Social Stories at scale, followed by rigorous human filtering to build a high-quality dataset. Additionally, we introduce textbf{quality assessment criteria} to evaluate the effectiveness of these generated stories. Considering that powerful closed-source large models require very complex instructions and expensive API fees, we finally fine-tune smaller language models with our curated high-quality dataset, achieving comparable results at lower costs and with simpler instruction and deployment. This work marks a significant step in leveraging AI to personalize Social Stories cost-effectively for autistic children at scale, which we hope can encourage future research. The prompt, code and data will release in the texttt{Technical Appendix} and texttt{Code & Data Appendix} at url{https://github.com/MIMIFY/SS-GEN}.
Read more9/10/2024
💬
0
BattleAgentBench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Cooperation and Competition Capabilities of Language Models in Multi-Agent Systems
Wei Wang, Dan Zhang, Tao Feng, Boyan Wang, Jie Tang
Large Language Models (LLMs) are becoming increasingly powerful and capable of handling complex tasks, e.g., building single agents and multi-agent systems. Compared to single agents, multi-agent systems have higher requirements for the collaboration capabilities of language models. Many benchmarks are proposed to evaluate their collaborative abilities. However, these benchmarks lack fine-grained evaluations of LLM collaborative capabilities. Additionally, multi-agent collaborative and competitive scenarios are ignored in existing works. To address these two problems, we propose a benchmark, called BattleAgentBench, which defines seven sub-stages of three varying difficulty levels and conducts a fine-grained evaluation of language models in terms of single-agent scenario navigation capabilities, paired-agent task execution abilities, and multi-agent collaboration and competition capabilities. We conducted extensive evaluations on leading four closed-source and seven open-source models. Experimental results indicate that API-based models perform excellently on simple tasks but open-source small models struggle with simple tasks. Regarding difficult tasks that require collaborative and competitive abilities, although API-based models have demonstrated some collaborative capabilities, there is still enormous room for improvement.
Read more8/29/2024
🤖
0
Evaluating and Modeling Social Intelligence: A Comparative Study of Human and AI Capabilities
Junqi Wang, Chunhui Zhang, Jiapeng Li, Yuxi Ma, Lixing Niu, Jiaheng Han, Yujia Peng, Yixin Zhu, Lifeng Fan
Facing the current debate on whether Large Language Models (LLMs) attain near-human intelligence levels (Mitchell & Krakauer, 2023; Bubeck et al., 2023; Kosinski, 2023; Shiffrin & Mitchell, 2023; Ullman, 2023), the current study introduces a benchmark for evaluating social intelligence, one of the most distinctive aspects of human cognition. We developed a comprehensive theoretical framework for social dynamics and introduced two evaluation tasks: Inverse Reasoning (IR) and Inverse Inverse Planning (IIP). Our approach also encompassed a computational model based on recursive Bayesian inference, adept at elucidating diverse human behavioral patterns. Extensive experiments and detailed analyses revealed that humans surpassed the latest GPT models in overall performance, zero-shot learning, one-shot generalization, and adaptability to multi-modalities. Notably, GPT models demonstrated social intelligence only at the most basic order (order = 0), in stark contrast to human social intelligence (order >= 2). Further examination indicated a propensity of LLMs to rely on pattern recognition for shortcuts, casting doubt on their possession of authentic human-level social intelligence. Our codes, dataset, appendix and human data are released at https://github.com/bigai-ai/Evaluate-n-Model-Social-Intelligence.
Read more5/21/2024