Towards Robust Training Datasets for Machine Learning with Ontologies: A Case Study for Emergency Road Vehicle Detection
0
🏋️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Machine Learning (ML) models are used in many critical domains, but their black box nature can make them difficult to trust.
- This research proposes a method to increase trust in ML models used in safety-critical domains by ensuring the robustness and completeness of the training dataset.
- The method uses domain and image quality ontologies to validate the training data, helping to improve trust in the model's robustness and accuracy.
- The paper includes a proof-of-concept experiment in the emergency road vehicle domain.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are used in many important areas, such as autonomous driving. However, these models can be like "black boxes," making it hard to understand how they work and to trust their decisions.
This is especially problematic in safety-critical domains, where mistakes could have serious consequences. To fully use machine learning in these areas, we need a way to increase trust in the models without experts having to manually check each decision.
The researchers propose a method to do this by ensuring the training data used to create the machine learning models is robust and comprehensive. Because the models learn from the data they are trained on, having complete and high-quality training data can help build trust in the models.
The method uses two specialized dictionaries, or ontologies, to validate the training data. One ontology covers the domain the model is being used in, like emergency vehicles. The other ontology covers characteristics of the images in the training data, like image quality.
By checking that the training data covers the full scope of the domain and has high-quality images, the researchers aim to increase confidence in the machine learning models. They demonstrate this approach with an experiment in the emergency vehicle domain.
Technical Explanation
The researchers propose using domain and image quality ontologies to validate the training datasets for machine learning models in safety-critical domains. This aims to increase trust in the robustness and accuracy of the models.
The domain ontology is used to ensure the training data comprehensively covers the relevant concepts and scenarios in the application area, such as emergency vehicles. The image quality ontology is used to validate that the visual data in the training set has the necessary characteristics for the model to learn accurately.
In the experiment, the researchers built ontologies for the emergency road vehicle domain and image quality characteristics. They then used these ontologies to assess the completeness and robustness of a training dataset for an emergency vehicle detection model.
By validating the training data in this way, the researchers believe it is possible to increase trust in machine learning models without requiring human experts to manually review each individual decision. This could enable wider adoption of machine learning in safety-critical domains.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations of their approach. First, building comprehensive ontologies requires significant time and effort. The experiment focused on a relatively narrow domain, so scaling this approach to broader or more complex domains may be challenging.
Additionally, while the ontologies can help validate the training data, they do not address other potential sources of model uncertainty or lack of robustness, such as model architecture or hyperparameter choices. Further research would be needed to fully address trust and reliability concerns for safety-critical machine learning applications.
The paper also does not discuss how to handle situations where the training data is found to be incomplete or of poor quality. Procedures for acquiring additional data or improving existing data would need to be developed to make this approach practical.
Overall, the proposed method is a useful step towards increasing trust in machine learning models for safety-critical domains, but significant challenges remain in ensuring the full robustness and reliability of these systems.
Conclusion
This research presents a novel approach to improving trust in machine learning models used in safety-critical applications. By validating the completeness and quality of training datasets using domain and image quality ontologies, the method aims to increase confidence in the robustness and accuracy of the models without requiring manual review of each decision.
While the experiment demonstrates the potential of this approach, the researchers acknowledge several limitations that would need to be addressed for wider adoption. Building comprehensive ontologies is resource-intensive, and the method does not fully address other sources of model uncertainty.
Nevertheless, this work represents an important step towards enabling greater use of machine learning in domains where safety and reliability are paramount. Continued research in this area could lead to new techniques for certifying the trustworthiness of AI systems, with significant implications for fields like autonomous driving, medical diagnosis, and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
0
Towards Robust Training Datasets for Machine Learning with Ontologies: A Case Study for Emergency Road Vehicle Detection
Lynn Vonderhaar, Timothy Elvira, Tyler Procko, Omar Ochoa
Countless domains rely on Machine Learning (ML) models, including safety-critical domains, such as autonomous driving, which this paper focuses on. While the black box nature of ML is simply a nuisance in some domains, in safety-critical domains, this makes ML models difficult to trust. To fully utilize ML models in safety-critical domains, it would be beneficial to have a method to improve trust in model robustness and accuracy without human experts checking each decision. This research proposes a method to increase trust in ML models used in safety-critical domains by ensuring the robustness and completeness of the model's training dataset. Because ML models embody what they are trained with, ensuring the completeness of training datasets can help to increase the trust in the training of ML models. To this end, this paper proposes the use of a domain ontology and an image quality characteristic ontology to validate the domain completeness and image quality robustness of a training dataset. This research also presents an experiment as a proof of concept for this method, where ontologies are built for the emergency road vehicle domain.
Read more6/24/2024
⛏️
0
Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer
Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh
This chapter explores the foundational concept of robustness in Machine Learning (ML) and its integral role in establishing trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The discussion begins with a detailed definition of robustness, portraying it as the ability of ML models to maintain stable performance across varied and unexpected environmental conditions. ML robustness is dissected through several lenses: its complementarity with generalizability; its status as a requirement for trustworthy AI; its adversarial vs non-adversarial aspects; its quantitative metrics; and its indicators such as reproducibility and explainability. The chapter delves into the factors that impede robustness, such as data bias, model complexity, and the pitfalls of underspecified ML pipelines. It surveys key techniques for robustness assessment from a broad perspective, including adversarial attacks, encompassing both digital and physical realms. It covers non-adversarial data shifts and nuances of Deep Learning (DL) software testing methodologies. The discussion progresses to explore amelioration strategies for bolstering robustness, starting with data-centric approaches like debiasing and augmentation. Further examination includes a variety of model-centric methods such as transfer learning, adversarial training, and randomized smoothing. Lastly, post-training methods are discussed, including ensemble techniques, pruning, and model repairs, emerging as cost-effective strategies to make models more resilient against the unpredictable. This chapter underscores the ongoing challenges and limitations in estimating and achieving ML robustness by existing approaches. It offers insights and directions for future research on this crucial concept, as a prerequisite for trustworthy AI systems.
Read more5/7/2024
🧠
0
Towards Precise Observations of Neural Model Robustness in Classification
Wenchuan Mu, Kwan Hui Lim
In deep learning applications, robustness measures the ability of neural models that handle slight changes in input data, which could lead to potential safety hazards, especially in safety-critical applications. Pre-deployment assessment of model robustness is essential, but existing methods often suffer from either high costs or imprecise results. To enhance safety in real-world scenarios, metrics that effectively capture the model's robustness are needed. To address this issue, we compare the rigour and usage conditions of various assessment methods based on different definitions. Then, we propose a straightforward and practical metric utilizing hypothesis testing for probabilistic robustness and have integrated it into the TorchAttacks library. Through a comparative analysis of diverse robustness assessment methods, our approach contributes to a deeper understanding of model robustness in safety-critical applications.
Read more4/26/2024
0
New!Trimming the Risk: Towards Reliable Continuous Training for Deep Learning Inspection Systems
Altaf Allah Abbassi, Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh, Thomas Reid
The industry increasingly relies on deep learning (DL) technology for manufacturing inspections, which are challenging to automate with rule-based machine vision algorithms. DL-powered inspection systems derive defect patterns from labeled images, combining human-like agility with the consistency of a computerized system. However, finite labeled datasets often fail to encompass all natural variations necessitating Continuous Training (CT) to regularly adjust their models with recent data. Effective CT requires fresh labeled samples from the original distribution; otherwise, selfgenerated labels can lead to silent performance degradation. To mitigate this risk, we develop a robust CT-based maintenance approach that updates DL models using reliable data selections through a two-stage filtering process. The initial stage filters out low-confidence predictions, as the model inherently discredits them. The second stage uses variational auto-encoders and histograms to generate image embeddings that capture latent and pixel characteristics, then rejects the inputs of substantially shifted embeddings as drifted data with erroneous overconfidence. Then, a fine-tuning of the original DL model is executed on the filtered inputs while validating on a mixture of recent production and original datasets. This strategy mitigates catastrophic forgetting and ensures the model adapts effectively to new operational conditions. Evaluations on industrial inspection systems for popsicle stick prints and glass bottles using critical real-world datasets showed less than 9% of erroneous self-labeled data are retained after filtering and used for fine-tuning, improving model performance on production data by up to 14% without compromising its results on original validation data.
Read more9/17/2024