Machine Learning Robustness: A Primer

2404.00897

YC

0

Reddit

0

Published 5/7/2024 by Houssem Ben Braiek, Foutse Khomh

⛏️

Abstract

This chapter explores the foundational concept of robustness in Machine Learning (ML) and its integral role in establishing trustworthiness in Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The discussion begins with a detailed definition of robustness, portraying it as the ability of ML models to maintain stable performance across varied and unexpected environmental conditions. ML robustness is dissected through several lenses: its complementarity with generalizability; its status as a requirement for trustworthy AI; its adversarial vs non-adversarial aspects; its quantitative metrics; and its indicators such as reproducibility and explainability. The chapter delves into the factors that impede robustness, such as data bias, model complexity, and the pitfalls of underspecified ML pipelines. It surveys key techniques for robustness assessment from a broad perspective, including adversarial attacks, encompassing both digital and physical realms. It covers non-adversarial data shifts and nuances of Deep Learning (DL) software testing methodologies. The discussion progresses to explore amelioration strategies for bolstering robustness, starting with data-centric approaches like debiasing and augmentation. Further examination includes a variety of model-centric methods such as transfer learning, adversarial training, and randomized smoothing. Lastly, post-training methods are discussed, including ensemble techniques, pruning, and model repairs, emerging as cost-effective strategies to make models more resilient against the unpredictable. This chapter underscores the ongoing challenges and limitations in estimating and achieving ML robustness by existing approaches. It offers insights and directions for future research on this crucial concept, as a prerequisite for trustworthy AI systems.

Create account to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Provides a primer on machine learning robustness
  • Defines robustness and discusses how it differs from traditional generalization
  • Covers key concepts, challenges, and techniques in machine learning robustness

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning (ML) models are increasingly being used in high-stakes applications, such as medical diagnosis, self-driving cars, and financial decision-making. However, these models can be vulnerable to unexpected inputs or perturbations that can cause them to make incorrect predictions. This is known as a lack of robustness.

Robustness refers to an ML model's ability to maintain its performance, even when faced with inputs that are slightly different from the ones it was trained on. This is different from the traditional idea of generalization, which focuses on a model's ability to perform well on new, but similar, data.

Ensuring the robustness of ML models is crucial, as it can help prevent them from making costly mistakes in real-world applications. This is particularly important in sensitive domains where the consequences of model failures can be severe, such as healthcare or security.

Researchers are exploring various techniques to improve the robustness of ML models, including adversarial training, data augmentation, and model regularization. However, there are still many open challenges in this field, such as understanding the underlying causes of brittleness and developing scalable evaluation methods.

Deploying robust ML models in real-world settings also presents unique challenges, such as dealing with distribution shifts, handling noisy or incomplete data, and ensuring the model's safety and reliability.

Technical Explanation

Robustness in machine learning refers to a model's ability to maintain its performance when faced with inputs that are slightly different from the ones it was trained on. This is in contrast to the traditional notion of generalization, which focuses on a model's ability to perform well on new, but similar, data.

Robustness is crucial for the real-world deployment of ML models, as these models can be vulnerable to a variety of perturbations, such as adversarial attacks, noise, or distribution shifts. If an ML model is not robust, it can make costly mistakes in high-stakes applications, such as medical diagnosis, self-driving cars, or financial decision-making.

Researchers have proposed various techniques to improve the robustness of ML models, including adversarial training, data augmentation, and model regularization. These methods aim to make the models more resilient to different types of perturbations, while maintaining their performance on the original task.

However, there are still many open challenges in the field of machine learning robustness. For example, understanding the underlying causes of model brittleness, developing scalable evaluation methods, and addressing distribution shifts in real-world deployments.

Deploying robust ML models in practical settings also presents unique challenges, such as dealing with noisy or incomplete data, ensuring the model's safety and reliability, and maintaining its performance over time as the deployment environment changes.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a solid introduction to the topic of machine learning robustness, clearly defining the concept and highlighting its importance for real-world applications. The authors also cover the key techniques and open challenges in the field, which is helpful for researchers and practitioners.

However, the paper could have delved deeper into some of the specific techniques and their trade-offs. For example, it could have provided more details on how adversarial training or data augmentation work, and the potential drawbacks or limitations of these approaches.

Additionally, the paper could have discussed the ethical implications of deploying robust ML models, particularly in high-stakes domains. For instance, how can we ensure that these models do not exhibit biases or discriminate against certain groups?

Further research is also needed to address the challenges of deploying robust ML models in dynamic, real-world environments. This includes developing methods for continuous monitoring and adaptation to account for changes in the data distribution or operating conditions.

Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding machine learning robustness, but there is still much work to be done in this important and rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

This primer on machine learning robustness highlights the importance of ensuring that ML models can maintain their performance in the face of unexpected inputs or perturbations. Robustness is crucial for the safe and reliable deployment of these models in high-stakes applications, where the consequences of model failures can be severe.

While researchers have made progress in developing techniques to improve the robustness of ML models, there are still many open challenges, such as understanding the underlying causes of brittleness, scaling up evaluation methods, and addressing the unique challenges of real-world deployments.

Continued research and innovation in the field of machine learning robustness will be essential for realizing the full potential of these powerful technologies, while mitigating the risks and ensuring the trustworthiness of the systems that rely on them.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Related Papers

Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

Resilience of Deep Learning applications: a systematic literature review of analysis and hardening techniques

Cristiana Bolchini, Luca Cassano, Antonio Miele

YC

0

Reddit

0

Machine Learning (ML) is currently being exploited in numerous applications being one of the most effective Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, used in diverse fields, such as vision, autonomous systems, and alike. The trend motivated a significant amount of contributions to the analysis and design of ML applications against faults affecting the underlying hardware. The authors investigate the existing body of knowledge on Deep Learning (among ML techniques) resilience against hardware faults systematically through a thoughtful review in which the strengths and weaknesses of this literature stream are presented clearly and then future avenues of research are set out. The review is based on 220 scientific articles published between January 2019 and March 2024. The authors adopt a classifying framework to interpret and highlight research similarities and peculiarities, based on several parameters, starting from the main scope of the work, the adopted fault and error models, to their reproducibility. This framework allows for a comparison of the different solutions and the identification of possible synergies. Furthermore, suggestions concerning the future direction of research are proposed in the form of open challenges to be addressed.

Read more

5/31/2024

Can you trust your explanations? A robustness test for feature attribution methods

Can you trust your explanations? A robustness test for feature attribution methods

Ilaria Vascotto, Alex Rodriguez, Alessandro Bonaita, Luca Bortolussi

YC

0

Reddit

0

The increase of legislative concerns towards the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has recently led to a series of regulations striving for a more transparent, trustworthy and accountable AI. Along with these proposals, the field of Explainable AI (XAI) has seen a rapid growth but the usage of its techniques has at times led to unexpected results. The robustness of the approaches is, in fact, a key property often overlooked: it is necessary to evaluate the stability of an explanation (to random and adversarial perturbations) to ensure that the results are trustable. To this end, we propose a test to evaluate the robustness to non-adversarial perturbations and an ensemble approach to analyse more in depth the robustness of XAI methods applied to neural networks and tabular datasets. We will show how leveraging manifold hypothesis and ensemble approaches can be beneficial to an in-depth analysis of the robustness.

Read more

6/21/2024

🧠

Towards Precise Observations of Neural Model Robustness in Classification

Wenchuan Mu, Kwan Hui Lim

YC

0

Reddit

0

In deep learning applications, robustness measures the ability of neural models that handle slight changes in input data, which could lead to potential safety hazards, especially in safety-critical applications. Pre-deployment assessment of model robustness is essential, but existing methods often suffer from either high costs or imprecise results. To enhance safety in real-world scenarios, metrics that effectively capture the model's robustness are needed. To address this issue, we compare the rigour and usage conditions of various assessment methods based on different definitions. Then, we propose a straightforward and practical metric utilizing hypothesis testing for probabilistic robustness and have integrated it into the TorchAttacks library. Through a comparative analysis of diverse robustness assessment methods, our approach contributes to a deeper understanding of model robustness in safety-critical applications.

Read more

4/26/2024

🧠

A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognition

Jie Wang, Jun Ai, Minyan Lu, Haoran Su, Dan Yu, Yutao Zhang, Junda Zhu, Jingyu Liu

YC

0

Reddit

0

In recent years, there has been significant attention given to the robustness assessment of neural networks. Robustness plays a critical role in ensuring reliable operation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems in complex and uncertain environments. Deep learning's robustness problem is particularly significant, highlighted by the discovery of adversarial attacks on image classification models. Researchers have dedicated efforts to evaluate robustness in diverse perturbation conditions for image recognition tasks. Robustness assessment encompasses two main techniques: robustness verification/ certification for deliberate adversarial attacks and robustness testing for random data corruptions. In this survey, we present a detailed examination of both adversarial robustness (AR) and corruption robustness (CR) in neural network assessment. Analyzing current research papers and standards, we provide an extensive overview of robustness assessment in image recognition. Three essential aspects are analyzed: concepts, metrics, and assessment methods. We investigate the perturbation metrics and range representations used to measure the degree of perturbations on images, as well as the robustness metrics specifically for the robustness conditions of classification models. The strengths and limitations of the existing methods are also discussed, and some potential directions for future research are provided.

Read more

4/16/2024