Towards a Sampling Theory for Implicit Neural Representations
0
Sign in to get full access
Introduction
This paper explores the theoretical foundations of implicit neural representations (INRs), which are a powerful tool for representing complex and continuous signals using neural networks. INRs have been applied to a wide range of problems, including image reconstruction, 3D shape modeling, and computational optimal control.
Problem Formulation
Sampling Theory for INRs
The paper aims to develop a sampling theory for INRs, which would provide a principled way to understand their representation capacity and the sampling requirements for different types of signals. This is important because INRs are often used to represent continuous signals, but their theoretical properties are not well understood.
Plain English Explanation
Implicit neural representations (INRs) are a way of using neural networks to represent complex, continuous signals like images or 3D shapes. Unlike traditional digital representations that store discrete samples, INRs use a neural network to learn a continuous function that can generate the signal at any desired resolution.
This allows for more efficient and flexible representation of signals, but it also raises questions about how much information needs to be "sampled" to fully capture the signal. Just like with digital sampling, there are limits on how much detail can be represented based on the complexity of the signal.
The researchers in this paper are trying to develop a theoretical framework, or "sampling theory," to understand these limits and the tradeoffs involved in using INRs. This could help guide the design of INR-based systems and ensure they can faithfully represent the signals they are meant to model.
Technical Explanation
The paper formulates the problem of sampling theory for INRs as follows:
- Signal Model: The researchers consider a general class of continuous signals that can be represented by a function $f(x)$, where $x$ is the input variable (e.g., spatial coordinates for an image).
- Sampling Process: The INR is trained on a set of samples $(x_i, f(x_i))$, where the $x_i$ are drawn from some sampling distribution.
- Representation Capacity: The goal is to understand the representation capacity of the INR, i.e., the class of functions it can approximate, and how this depends on the sampling distribution and other hyperparameters of the INR.
The paper then develops theoretical results to characterize the representation capacity of INRs under different assumptions about the signal model and sampling process. This includes analyzing the role of network architecture, activation functions, and optimization techniques in determining the representation power of INRs.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable theoretical foundation for understanding the capabilities and limitations of INRs. By developing a sampling theory for these representations, the authors offer insights that can guide the design and application of INR-based systems.
However, the analysis is limited to idealized signal models and sampling processes, and the practical implications for real-world problems may require further investigation. Additionally, the paper does not address the robustness of INRs to noise or other practical challenges that may arise in deploying these representations in complex environments.
Conclusion
This paper lays the groundwork for a more rigorous understanding of implicit neural representations, which have emerged as a powerful tool for modeling continuous signals. By developing a sampling theory for INRs, the authors provide a framework for analyzing their representation capacity and guiding their application to a wide range of problems in machine learning and signal processing.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards a Sampling Theory for Implicit Neural Representations
Mahrokh Najaf, Gregory Ongie
Implicit neural representations (INRs) have emerged as a powerful tool for solving inverse problems in computer vision and computational imaging. INRs represent images as continuous domain functions realized by a neural network taking spatial coordinates as inputs. However, unlike traditional pixel representations, little is known about the sample complexity of estimating images using INRs in the context of linear inverse problems. Towards this end, we study the sampling requirements for recovery of a continuous domain image from its low-pass Fourier coefficients by fitting a single hidden-layer INR with ReLU activation and a Fourier features layer using a generalized form of weight decay regularization. Our key insight is to relate minimizers of this non-convex parameter space optimization problem to minimizers of a convex penalty defined over an infinite-dimensional space of measures. We identify a sufficient number of samples for which an image realized by a width-1 INR is exactly recoverable by solving the INR training problem, and give a conjecture for the general width-$W$ case. To validate our theory, we empirically assess the probability of achieving exact recovery of images realized by low-width single hidden-layer INRs, and illustrate the performance of INR on super-resolution recovery of more realistic continuous domain phantom images.
Read more5/29/2024
0
Streaming Neural Images
Marcos V. Conde, Andy Bigos, Radu Timofte
Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) are a novel paradigm for signal representation that have attracted considerable interest for image compression. INRs offer unprecedented advantages in signal resolution and memory efficiency, enabling new possibilities for compression techniques. However, the existing limitations of INRs for image compression have not been sufficiently addressed in the literature. In this work, we explore the critical yet overlooked limiting factors of INRs, such as computational cost, unstable performance, and robustness. Through extensive experiments and empirical analysis, we provide a deeper and more nuanced understanding of implicit neural image compression methods such as Fourier Feature Networks and Siren. Our work also offers valuable insights for future research in this area.
Read more9/26/2024
0
Conv-INR: Convolutional Implicit Neural Representation for Multimodal Visual Signals
Zhicheng Cai
Implicit neural representation (INR) has recently emerged as a promising paradigm for signal representations. Typically, INR is parameterized by a multiplayer perceptron (MLP) which takes the coordinates as the inputs and generates corresponding attributes of a signal. However, MLP-based INRs face two critical issues: i) individually considering each coordinate while ignoring the connections; ii) suffering from the spectral bias thus failing to learn high-frequency components. While target visual signals usually exhibit strong local structures and neighborhood dependencies, and high-frequency components are significant in these signals, the issues harm the representational capacity of INRs. This paper proposes Conv-INR, the first INR model fully based on convolution. Due to the inherent attributes of convolution, Conv-INR can simultaneously consider adjacent coordinates and learn high-frequency components effectively. Compared to existing MLP-based INRs, Conv-INR has better representational capacity and trainability without requiring primary function expansion. We conduct extensive experiments on four tasks, including image fitting, CT/MRI reconstruction, and novel view synthesis, Conv-INR all significantly surpasses existing MLP-based INRs, validating the effectiveness. Finally, we raise three reparameterization methods that can further enhance the performance of the vanilla Conv-INR without introducing any extra inference cost.
Read more6/7/2024
0
INFusion: Diffusion Regularized Implicit Neural Representations for 2D and 3D accelerated MRI reconstruction
Yamin Arefeen, Brett Levac, Zach Stoebner, Jonathan Tamir
Implicit Neural Representations (INRs) are a learning-based approach to accelerate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) acquisitions, particularly in scan-specific settings when only data from the under-sampled scan itself are available. Previous work demonstrates that INRs improve rapid MRI through inherent regularization imposed by neural network architectures. Typically parameterized by fully-connected neural networks, INRs support continuous image representations by taking a physical coordinate location as input and outputting the intensity at that coordinate. Previous work has applied unlearned regularization priors during INR training and have been limited to 2D or low-resolution 3D acquisitions. Meanwhile, diffusion based generative models have received recent attention as they learn powerful image priors decoupled from the measurement model. This work proposes INFusion, a technique that regularizes the optimization of INRs from under-sampled MR measurements with pre-trained diffusion models for improved image reconstruction. In addition, we propose a hybrid 3D approach with our diffusion regularization that enables INR application on large-scale 3D MR datasets. 2D experiments demonstrate improved INR training with our proposed diffusion regularization, and 3D experiments demonstrate feasibility of INR training with diffusion regularization on 3D matrix sizes of 256 by 256 by 80.
Read more6/21/2024