Towards Trustworthy Reranking: A Simple yet Effective Abstention Mechanism
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper proposes a simple yet effective abstention mechanism to improve the trustworthiness of reranking systems.
- Reranking systems are used to re-order search results or recommendations to provide more relevant and reliable outputs.
- The abstention mechanism allows the system to abstain from making a prediction when it is not confident, instead of providing a potentially unreliable output.
- This can help increase the overall trustworthiness of the reranking system.
Plain English Explanation
The paper tackles the challenge of making reranking systems more trustworthy. Reranking systems are used to re-order search results or recommendations, with the goal of providing more relevant and reliable outputs. However, these systems can sometimes make mistakes or provide outputs that users may not fully trust.
The key idea proposed in the paper is an "abstention mechanism." This means that the reranking system has the ability to say "I'm not sure" or "I don't have enough confidence to make a prediction" in certain cases. By abstaining from making a prediction when it is not confident, the system can avoid providing potentially unreliable outputs, which helps increase the overall trustworthiness of the system.
This is like a human expert being honest and admitting when they don't have enough information to provide a reliable answer, rather than guessing and potentially giving wrong information. The abstention mechanism acts as a safeguard to prevent the reranking system from making mistakes that could mislead users.
Technical Explanation
The paper formally defines the problem of "trustworthy reranking," where the goal is to develop reranking systems that can abstain from making predictions when they are not confident, in order to improve the overall trustworthiness of the system.
The authors propose a simple yet effective abstention mechanism that can be incorporated into existing reranking models. The key idea is to train the model to not only predict the reranked order, but also to estimate its own confidence in that prediction. If the confidence is below a certain threshold, the system will abstain from making a prediction, rather than providing a potentially unreliable output.
The authors evaluate their approach on several standard reranking benchmarks, demonstrating that the abstention mechanism can significantly improve the trustworthiness of the reranking system without sacrificing much in terms of ranking performance. They show that the system is able to accurately identify when it is not confident and abstain appropriately, leading to more trustworthy overall results.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a straightforward and intuitive solution to the problem of improving the trustworthiness of reranking systems. The abstention mechanism is a simple yet effective approach that can be easily incorporated into existing models.
One potential limitation is that the abstention threshold needs to be carefully tuned to balance the tradeoff between trustworthiness and ranking performance. If the threshold is set too high, the system may abstain too frequently, reducing its overall utility. Conversely, if the threshold is too low, the system may still provide untrustworthy outputs in some cases.
Additionally, the paper only evaluates the approach on standard reranking benchmarks, which may not fully capture real-world usage scenarios. Further research could explore the effectiveness of the abstention mechanism in more diverse and complex settings, such as personalized recommendations or specialized search domains.
Conclusion
Overall, the paper presents a promising approach to improving the trustworthiness of reranking systems. The abstention mechanism allows the system to avoid making unreliable predictions, which can help build user trust and confidence in the outputs. While there are some potential limitations, the simplicity and effectiveness of the proposed solution make it an attractive option for enhancing the reliability of reranking systems in various applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Trustworthy Reranking: A Simple yet Effective Abstention Mechanism
Hippolyte Gisserot-Boukhlef, Manuel Faysse, Emmanuel Malherbe, C'eline Hudelot, Pierre Colombo
Neural Information Retrieval (NIR) has significantly improved upon heuristic-based IR systems. Yet, failures remain frequent, the models used often being unable to retrieve documents relevant to the user's query. We address this challenge by proposing a lightweight abstention mechanism tailored for real-world constraints, with particular emphasis placed on the reranking phase. We introduce a protocol for evaluating abstention strategies in a black-box scenario, demonstrating their efficacy, and propose a simple yet effective data-driven mechanism. We provide open-source code for experiment replication and abstention implementation, fostering wider adoption and application in diverse contexts.
Read more4/3/2024
0
The Art of Refusal: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models
Bingbing Wen, Jihan Yao, Shangbin Feng, Chenjun Xu, Yulia Tsvetkov, Bill Howe, Lucy Lu Wang
Abstention, the refusal of large language models (LLMs) to provide an answer, is increasingly recognized for its potential to mitigate hallucinations and enhance safety in building LLM systems. In this survey, we introduce a framework to examine abstention behavior from three perspectives: the query, the model, and human values. We review the literature on abstention methods (categorized based on the development stages of LLMs), benchmarks, and evaluation metrics, and discuss the merits and limitations of prior work. We further identify and motivate areas for future research, such as encouraging the study of abstention as a meta-capability across tasks and customizing abstention abilities based on context. In doing so, we aim to broaden the scope and impact of abstention methodologies in AI systems.
Read more7/29/2024
0
Do LLMs Know When to NOT Answer? Investigating Abstention Abilities of Large Language Models
Nishanth Madhusudhan, Sathwik Tejaswi Madhusudhan, Vikas Yadav, Masoud Hashemi
As Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance across various NLP tasks, their reliability becomes essential for widespread adoption. This paper focuses on Abstention Ability (AA), a critical yet under explored aspect of reliability - the ability of LLMs to refrain from answering questions when they are uncertain or when definitive answer is not possible, while maintaining question-answering (QA) task performance. While previous works have focused on understanding the recollection abilities of LLMs or their ability to identify imponderable/unanswerable questions, we believe there is a need for an effective AA evaluation method. Therefore, we propose a black-box evaluation methodology to examine and understand the AA of LLMs across a variety of multiple-choice QA tasks. We measure AA by rewarding models for abstaining from answering when their predictions are incorrect or when the questions are inherently unanswerable. We investigate three strategies, Strict Prompting, Verbal Confidence Thresholding, and Chain-of-Thought (CoT), to understand their impact on abstention across different LLMs. Our findings reveal that while even state-of-the-art LLMs like GPT-4 struggle with abstention, strategic prompting such as CoT, can significantly enhance this ability. Furthermore, we demonstrate that improving AA also leads to better overall QA task performance, underscoring the importance of evaluating AA in LLMs.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Abstaining Machine Learning -- Philosophical Considerations
Daniela Schuster
This paper establishes a connection between the fields of machine learning (ML) and philosophy concerning the phenomenon of behaving neutrally. It investigates a specific class of ML systems capable of delivering a neutral response to a given task, referred to as abstaining machine learning systems, that has not yet been studied from a philosophical perspective. The paper introduces and explains various abstaining machine learning systems, and categorizes them into distinct types. An examination is conducted on how abstention in the different machine learning system types aligns with the epistemological counterpart of suspended judgment, addressing both the nature of suspension and its normative profile. Additionally, a philosophical analysis is suggested on the autonomy and explainability of the abstaining response. It is argued, specifically, that one of the distinguished types of abstaining systems is preferable as it aligns more closely with our criteria for suspended judgment. Moreover, it is better equipped to autonomously generate abstaining outputs and offer explanations for abstaining outputs when compared to the other type.
Read more9/4/2024