Towards Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent
2401.14016
0
0
Abstract
While Language Agents have achieved promising success by placing Large Language Models at the core of a more versatile design that dynamically interacts with the external world, the existing approaches neglect the notion of uncertainty during these interactions. We present the Uncertainty-Aware Language Agent (UALA), a framework that orchestrates the interaction between the agent and the external world using uncertainty quantification. Compared with other well-known counterparts like ReAct, our extensive experiments across 3 representative tasks (HotpotQA, StrategyQA, MMLU) and various LLM sizes demonstrate that UALA brings a significant improvement of performance, while having a substantially lower reliance on the external world (i.e., reduced number of tool calls and tokens). Our analyses provide various insights including the great potential of UALA compared with agent fine-tuning, and underscore the unreliability of verbalised confidence of LLMs as a proxy for uncertainty.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the development of an "uncertainty-aware" language agent, which aims to better understand and express uncertainty in its language processing and generation.
- The researchers investigate methods for imbuing language models with the ability to recognize and communicate their own uncertainty, rather than producing overconfident or deterministic outputs.
- Potential applications include enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of conversational AI systems, as well as improving their ability to handle ambiguous or open-ended scenarios.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper are working on creating a more "uncertainty-aware" language model - an AI system that can understand and communicate the limits of its own knowledge and capabilities. Rather than always trying to provide a single, definitive answer, this system would be able to recognize when it is uncertain or unsure, and express that uncertainty to the human user.
This is an important goal, as current language AI can sometimes come across as overconfident or inflexible, which can undermine trust and make the systems less useful in real-world situations. By imbuing the language model with a sense of its own uncertainty, the researchers hope to create an agent that is more honest, transparent, and adaptable.
Here are some examples of other research exploring uncertainty in language AI - the key idea is to give these systems a better understanding of what they do and don't know, rather than just trying to generate the "correct" response every time.
Technical Explanation
The core of the researchers' approach is to train the language model not just to generate text, but to also produce estimates of its own confidence or uncertainty about that text. This is achieved through modifications to the model architecture and training process, such as incorporating uncertainty-aware modules and using techniques to quantify uncertainty.
By equipping the language model with this self-awareness, the researchers aim to harness the power of large language models while still maintaining uncertainty-aware capabilities. This could allow the system to better handle open-ended, ambiguous, or under-specified inputs, and provide more nuanced and context-sensitive responses.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges that effectively communicating uncertainty is a challenging task, as overconfidence can actually be more persuasive to users. The researchers note that further work is needed to develop natural and intuitive ways for the language agent to express its level of confidence or uncertainty.
Additionally, the experimental setup and evaluation metrics used in the paper may not fully capture the real-world performance and usability of such an uncertainty-aware system. More research is needed to understand how users would perceive and interact with a language agent that openly acknowledges its limitations.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper represents an important step towards developing more transparent, trustworthy, and adaptable language AI systems. By giving these models a better understanding of their own uncertainty, the researchers hope to create agents that can engage in more nuanced, context-sensitive, and honest dialogue with human users. While significant challenges remain, this work points the way towards a future where AI language systems are better equipped to handle the complexities and ambiguities of real-world communication.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment
Yikun Wang, Rui Zheng, Liang Ding, Qi Zhang, Dahua Lin, Dacheng Tao
0
0
As instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) evolve, aligning pretrained foundation models presents increasing challenges. Existing alignment strategies, which typically leverage diverse and high-quality data sources, often overlook the intrinsic uncertainty of tasks, learning all data samples equally. This may lead to suboptimal data efficiency and model performance. In response, we propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios, by introducing the sample uncertainty (elicited from more capable LLMs). We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Analysis shows that our UAL indeed facilitates better token clustering in the feature space, validating our hypothesis. Extensive experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning. Notably, LLMs aligned in a mixed scenario have achieved an average improvement of 10.62% on high-entropy tasks (i.e., AlpacaEval leaderboard), and 1.81% on complex low-entropy tasks (i.e., MetaMath and GSM8K).
6/10/2024
💬
Uncertainty of Thoughts: Uncertainty-Aware Planning Enhances Information Seeking in Large Language Models
Zhiyuan Hu, Chumin Liu, Xidong Feng, Yilun Zhao, See-Kiong Ng, Anh Tuan Luu, Junxian He, Pang Wei Koh, Bryan Hooi
0
0
In the face of uncertainty, the ability to *seek information* is of fundamental importance. In many practical applications, such as medical diagnosis and troubleshooting, the information needed to solve the task is not initially given and has to be actively sought by asking follow-up questions (for example, a doctor asking a patient for more details about their symptoms). In this work, we introduce Uncertainty of Thoughts (UoT), an algorithm to augment large language models with the ability to actively seek information by asking effective questions. UoT combines 1) an *uncertainty-aware simulation approach* which enables the model to simulate possible future scenarios and how likely they are to occur, 2) *uncertainty-based rewards* motivated by information gain which incentivizes the model to seek information, and 3) a *reward propagation scheme* to select the optimal question to ask in a way that maximizes the expected reward. In experiments on medical diagnosis, troubleshooting, and the `20 Questions` game, UoT achieves an average performance improvement of 38.1% in the rate of successful task completion across multiple LLMs compared with direct prompting and also improves efficiency (i.e., the number of questions needed to complete the task). Our code has been released [here](https://github.com/zhiyuanhubj/UoT)
5/31/2024
Shifting Attention to Relevance: Towards the Predictive Uncertainty Quantification of Free-Form Large Language Models
Jinhao Duan, Hao Cheng, Shiqi Wang, Alex Zavalny, Chenan Wang, Renjing Xu, Bhavya Kailkhura, Kaidi Xu
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) show promising results in language generation and instruction following but frequently hallucinate, making their outputs less reliable. Despite Uncertainty Quantification's (UQ) potential solutions, implementing it accurately within LLMs is challenging. Our research introduces a simple heuristic: not all tokens in auto-regressive LLM text equally represent the underlying meaning, as linguistic redundancy often allows a few keywords to convey the essence of long sentences. However, current methods underestimate this inequality when assessing uncertainty, causing tokens with limited semantics to be equally or excessively weighted in UQ. To correct this, we propose Shifting Attention to more Relevant (SAR) components at both token- and sentence-levels for better UQ. We conduct extensive experiments involving a range of popular off-the-shelf LLMs, such as Vicuna, WizardLM, and LLaMA-2-chat, with model sizes extending up to 33B parameters. We evaluate various free-form question-answering tasks, encompassing domains such as reading comprehension, science Q&A, and medical Q&A. Our experimental results, coupled with a comprehensive demographic analysis, demonstrate the superior performance of SAR. The code is available at https://github.com/jinhaoduan/SAR.
5/30/2024
💬
Generating with Confidence: Uncertainty Quantification for Black-box Large Language Models
Zhen Lin, Shubhendu Trivedi, Jimeng Sun
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) specializing in natural language generation (NLG) have recently started exhibiting promising capabilities across a variety of domains. However, gauging the trustworthiness of responses generated by LLMs remains an open challenge, with limited research on uncertainty quantification (UQ) for NLG. Furthermore, existing literature typically assumes white-box access to language models, which is becoming unrealistic either due to the closed-source nature of the latest LLMs or computational constraints. In this work, we investigate UQ in NLG for *black-box* LLMs. We first differentiate *uncertainty* vs *confidence*: the former refers to the ``dispersion'' of the potential predictions for a fixed input, and the latter refers to the confidence on a particular prediction/generation. We then propose and compare several confidence/uncertainty measures, applying them to *selective NLG* where unreliable results could either be ignored or yielded for further assessment. Experiments were carried out with several popular LLMs on question-answering datasets (for evaluation purposes). Results reveal that a simple measure for the semantic dispersion can be a reliable predictor of the quality of LLM responses, providing valuable insights for practitioners on uncertainty management when adopting LLMs. The code to replicate our experiments is available at https://github.com/zlin7/UQ-NLG.
5/21/2024