Towards Weakly-Supervised Hate Speech Classification Across Datasets

Overview

• Current research on hate speech (HS) recognition is hindered by inconsistent data creation strategies and varying annotation methods.
• This leads to poor generalization of supervised learning models, as they struggle to perform well on datasets they weren't trained on.
• The authors propose using extremely weak supervision, which only relies on class names rather than annotated samples, to address this issue.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explains that current research on detecting hate speech online has a major problem - the data used to train these systems is often created and annotated in very different ways. This can lead to issues with the performance of these models when they are used in new situations.

To solve this, the researchers suggest using a new approach called "extremely weak supervision." Instead of training the hate speech detection models on detailed annotations of examples, they only use the general category names (like "hate speech" or "not hate speech"). This allows the models to learn patterns without being overly influenced by the specific ways the training data was collected and labeled.

The paper shows that this weak supervision approach can work well, allowing the hate speech models to perform well both on the original datasets they were trained on, as well as new datasets that use different labeling methods. This helps address the challenge of building hate speech detection systems that can work across cultures and languages.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes using a weakly-supervised text classification model to address the generalization issues in hate speech (HS) recognition. Rather than relying on detailed annotations of HS examples, the approach only uses the class names (e.g. "hate speech," "not hate speech") during training.

The authors evaluate this approach in both in-dataset and cross-dataset settings, demonstrating its effectiveness compared to traditional supervised learning. They also conduct a quantitative and qualitative analysis to understand the sources of poor generalizability in HS classification models.

The findings suggest that this weakly-supervised technique can help overcome the challenges posed by diverging annotation schemes and unsystematic data creation in current HS research.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising solution to the generalization issues in hate speech detection, but it is important to consider some potential limitations and areas for further research:

• The experiments were conducted on a limited set of datasets, so more extensive testing is needed to fully validate the approach across a wider range of HS taxonomies and cultural contexts.

• The qualitative analysis provides insights, but a more systematic investigation of the sources of poor generalizability would be valuable.

Additionally, the authors do not address the potential risks of using weakly-supervised techniques, such as the possible amplification of biases present in the training data. Further research is needed to ensure these models do not inadvertently reinforce harmful stereotypes or discriminatory patterns.

Conclusion

This paper offers a novel approach to improving the generalization of hate speech detection models by using extremely weak supervision. The findings suggest this technique can help overcome the limitations of current HS research, which is hindered by inconsistent data creation and annotation practices.

While more extensive testing is needed, the proposed method shows promise in enabling hate speech detection systems to perform well across diverse datasets and cultural contexts. This could be an important step towards developing more robust and responsible HS moderation tools.