Transformation-Dependent Adversarial Attacks
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new type of adversarial attack called "Transformation-Dependent Adversarial Attacks" (TDAA).
- Adversarial attacks are a technique where small, imperceptible changes are made to an input (e.g. an image) to cause a machine learning model to misclassify it.
- TDAAs leverage the fact that many machine learning models are sensitive to transformations like rotation, scaling, or translation, and use this to craft attacks that are more effective and transferable across models.
- The authors propose various TDAA attack methods and demonstrate their effectiveness on image classification and text classification tasks.
Plain English Explanation
Adversarial attacks are a fascinating area of machine learning research. Imagine you have an image of a cat, and you make just a tiny change to it - so small that a human wouldn't even notice. But when you feed that slightly modified image into an AI model, the model thinks it's a dog! This is the core idea behind adversarial attacks.
The paper introduces a new type of adversarial attack that takes advantage of the fact that many AI models are very sensitive to transformations like rotation, scaling, or translation of the input. The authors show that by carefully crafting adversarial examples that exploit this sensitivity, they can create attacks that work across a wide range of AI models, not just the one they were designed for.
This is an important advancement because it means adversaries don't need to design custom attacks for every single model they want to trick - they can create a more universal attack that is effective against many different AI systems. The paper explores several methods for generating these "transformation-dependent" adversarial examples and demonstrates their effectiveness on both image and text classification tasks.
Technical Explanation
The key innovation in this paper is the introduction of "Transformation-Dependent Adversarial Attacks" (TDAAs). Traditional adversarial attacks aim to find small perturbations to an input that cause a target model to misclassify it. However, these attacks often do not transfer well to other models.
TDAAs leverage the fact that many machine learning models are sensitive to simple transformations like rotation, scaling, or translation of the input. The authors propose several TDAA methods that crafts adversarial examples by optimizing for a loss function that incorporates the sensitivity of the target model to these transformations.
For example, one TDAA method, called "Transformation-Aware Projected Gradient Descent" (TA-PGD), iteratively updates the adversarial perturbation by considering the gradient of the loss with respect to both the original input and its transformed versions. This allows the attack to craft perturbations that are effective against not just the original input, but also transformed versions of it.
The authors evaluate their TDAA methods on both image classification (CIFAR-10, ImageNet) and text classification (IMDB, AG News) tasks. They show that TDAAs can achieve higher attack success rates and better transferability across models compared to prior adversarial attack approaches. They also provide analysis on the importance of different transformation types and the robustness of their attacks to defenses.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the power of leveraging transformation-based weaknesses in machine learning models to craft more effective and transferable adversarial attacks. The TDAA methods proposed are technically sound and the empirical results are strong.
However, one limitation is that the paper focuses primarily on simple geometric transformations like rotation, scaling, and translation. It would be interesting to see if the TDAA approach can be extended to handle more complex, semantically-meaningful transformations as well.
Additionally, while the authors briefly discuss the potential for defending against TDAAs, more work is needed to develop robust countermeasures. As adversarial attacks become more sophisticated, the AI security community will need to continually innovate to stay ahead of the curve.
Overall, this paper represents an important advance in adversarial machine learning and highlights the need for continued research into the vulnerabilities of AI systems. By understanding these weaknesses, we can work towards building more robust and secure machine learning models.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new class of adversarial attacks called "Transformation-Dependent Adversarial Attacks" (TDAAs) that leverage the sensitivity of many machine learning models to input transformations like rotation, scaling, and translation. The authors propose several TDAA methods and demonstrate their effectiveness on both image and text classification tasks.
The key insight is that by crafting adversarial examples that not only fool a target model on the original input, but also on transformed versions of that input, the attacks can achieve higher success rates and better transferability across different models. This is a significant advancement over prior adversarial attack approaches.
While more work is needed to develop robust defenses against TDAAs, this paper represents an important step forward in understanding the vulnerabilities of AI systems. As machine learning continues to be deployed in high-stakes applications, techniques like those proposed here will be crucial for ensuring the security and reliability of these technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Transformation-Dependent Adversarial Attacks
Yaoteng Tan, Zikui Cai, M. Salman Asif
We introduce transformation-dependent adversarial attacks, a new class of threats where a single additive perturbation can trigger diverse, controllable mis-predictions by systematically transforming the input (e.g., scaling, blurring, compression). Unlike traditional attacks with static effects, our perturbations embed metamorphic properties to enable different adversarial attacks as a function of the transformation parameters. We demonstrate the transformation-dependent vulnerability across models (e.g., convolutional networks and vision transformers) and vision tasks (e.g., image classification and object detection). Our proposed geometric and photometric transformations enable a range of targeted errors from one crafted input (e.g., higher than 90% attack success rate for classifiers). We analyze effects of model architecture and type/variety of transformations on attack effectiveness. This work forces a paradigm shift by redefining adversarial inputs as dynamic, controllable threats. We highlight the need for robust defenses against such multifaceted, chameleon-like perturbations that current techniques are ill-prepared for.
Read more6/13/2024
↗️
0
Learning to Transform Dynamically for Better Adversarial Transferability
Rongyi Zhu, Zeliang Zhang, Susan Liang, Zhuo Liu, Chenliang Xu
Adversarial examples, crafted by adding perturbations imperceptible to humans, can deceive neural networks. Recent studies identify the adversarial transferability across various models, textit{i.e.}, the cross-model attack ability of adversarial samples. To enhance such adversarial transferability, existing input transformation-based methods diversify input data with transformation augmentation. However, their effectiveness is limited by the finite number of available transformations. In our study, we introduce a novel approach named Learning to Transform (L2T). L2T increases the diversity of transformed images by selecting the optimal combination of operations from a pool of candidates, consequently improving adversarial transferability. We conceptualize the selection of optimal transformation combinations as a trajectory optimization problem and employ a reinforcement learning strategy to effectively solve the problem. Comprehensive experiments on the ImageNet dataset, as well as practical tests with Google Vision and GPT-4V, reveal that L2T surpasses current methodologies in enhancing adversarial transferability, thereby confirming its effectiveness and practical significance. The code is available at https://github.com/RongyiZhu/L2T.
Read more7/25/2024
🎲
0
How adversarial attacks can disrupt seemingly stable accurate classifiers
Oliver J. Sutton, Qinghua Zhou, Ivan Y. Tyukin, Alexander N. Gorban, Alexander Bastounis, Desmond J. Higham
Adversarial attacks dramatically change the output of an otherwise accurate learning system using a seemingly inconsequential modification to a piece of input data. Paradoxically, empirical evidence indicates that even systems which are robust to large random perturbations of the input data remain susceptible to small, easily constructed, adversarial perturbations of their inputs. Here, we show that this may be seen as a fundamental feature of classifiers working with high dimensional input data. We introduce a simple generic and generalisable framework for which key behaviours observed in practical systems arise with high probability -- notably the simultaneous susceptibility of the (otherwise accurate) model to easily constructed adversarial attacks, and robustness to random perturbations of the input data. We confirm that the same phenomena are directly observed in practical neural networks trained on standard image classification problems, where even large additive random noise fails to trigger the adversarial instability of the network. A surprising takeaway is that even small margins separating a classifier's decision surface from training and testing data can hide adversarial susceptibility from being detected using randomly sampled perturbations. Counterintuitively, using additive noise during training or testing is therefore inefficient for eradicating or detecting adversarial examples, and more demanding adversarial training is required.
Read more9/10/2024
📉
0
Bag of Tricks to Boost Adversarial Transferability
Zeliang Zhang, Wei Yao, Xiaosen Wang
Deep neural networks are widely known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. However, vanilla adversarial examples generated under the white-box setting often exhibit low transferability across different models. Since adversarial transferability poses more severe threats to practical applications, various approaches have been proposed for better transferability, including gradient-based, input transformation-based, and model-related attacks, etc. In this work, we find that several tiny changes in the existing adversarial attacks can significantly affect the attack performance, eg, the number of iterations and step size. Based on careful studies of existing adversarial attacks, we propose a bag of tricks to enhance adversarial transferability, including momentum initialization, scheduled step size, dual example, spectral-based input transformation, and several ensemble strategies. Extensive experiments on the ImageNet dataset validate the high effectiveness of our proposed tricks and show that combining them can further boost adversarial transferability. Our work provides practical insights and techniques to enhance adversarial transferability, and offers guidance to improve the attack performance on the real-world application through simple adjustments.
Read more7/23/2024