TrialEnroll: Predicting Clinical Trial Enrollment Success with Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2407.13115 - Published 7/19/2024 by Ling Yue, Sixue Xing, Jintai Chen, Tianfan Fu
Total Score

0

TrialEnroll: Predicting Clinical Trial Enrollment Success with Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents TrialEnroll, a deep learning model for predicting the success of clinical trial enrollment.
  • The model leverages a Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models to capture complex relationships between trial characteristics and enrollment outcomes.
  • The authors demonstrate that TrialEnroll outperforms existing approaches in predicting whether a clinical trial will successfully enroll its target patient population.

Plain English Explanation

The process of recruiting patients for clinical trials is a major challenge in drug development. Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Models and Language Interaction Network for Clinical Trial Approval Estimation have explored using machine learning to address this problem.

The researchers behind TrialEnroll have taken this a step further by developing a deep learning model that can predict the success of clinical trial enrollment. Their model, TrialEnroll, combines a Deep & Cross Network with Large Language Models to capture the complex relationships between various trial characteristics (e.g., trial design, patient population, geographic location) and whether the trial is able to enroll its target number of participants.

By leveraging these advanced AI techniques, TrialEnroll outperforms previous approaches in accurately forecasting clinical trial enrollment outcomes. This could be incredibly valuable for pharmaceutical companies and research organizations, allowing them to better plan and allocate resources for their trials.

For example, if TrialEnroll predicts that a trial is unlikely to meet its enrollment goals, the researchers could adjust the trial design, patient recruitment strategies, or other factors to improve the chances of success. End-to-End Clinical Trial Matching with Large Language Models and Multimodal Clinical Trial Outcome Prediction with Large Language Models have explored related approaches in this space.

Ultimately, TrialEnroll represents an important step forward in using AI to streamline the clinical trial process and bring new treatments to patients more efficiently. Towards Efficient Patient Recruitment for Clinical Trials: An Application discusses similar efforts in this direction.

Technical Explanation

The TrialEnroll model combines a Deep & Cross Network (DCN) and Large Language Models (LLMs) to predict the enrollment success of clinical trials. The DCN component captures complex feature interactions, while the LLM component extracts rich semantic information from unstructured trial descriptions.

The authors curate a large dataset of past clinical trials, including information about the trial design, patient population, recruitment methods, and enrollment outcomes. They use this data to train and evaluate the TrialEnroll model.

Experiments show that TrialEnroll outperforms existing machine learning approaches, such as logistic regression and gradient boosting, in predicting whether a trial will successfully enroll its target number of participants. The model achieves high accuracy in distinguishing between trials that met their enrollment goals and those that did not.

The authors note that TrialEnroll's performance benefits from its ability to learn intricate relationships between trial characteristics and enrollment outcomes. The DCN component allows the model to capture higher-order feature interactions, while the LLM component enriches the representation of unstructured trial information.

Critical Analysis

The TrialEnroll paper provides a compelling demonstration of how advanced AI techniques can be leveraged to address a critical challenge in the clinical trial process. The authors have carefully designed their model and experiments to showcase its effectiveness in predicting enrollment success.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations of the research or potential areas for further improvement. For example, the dataset used for training and evaluation may not be representative of the full diversity of clinical trials, and the model's performance may vary across different therapeutic areas or trial designs.

Additionally, the paper does not discuss the interpretability of the TrialEnroll model. Understanding the specific factors that influence the model's predictions could be valuable for researchers and clinicians who need to make informed decisions about trial design and patient recruitment strategies.

Future research could explore ways to make the TrialEnroll model more transparent and explainable, potentially by integrating techniques from the field of Explainable AI (XAI). This could help foster greater trust and adoption of the model in the clinical research community.

Conclusion

The TrialEnroll paper presents a powerful deep learning approach for predicting the success of clinical trial enrollment. By combining a Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models, the model is able to capture the complex relationships between trial characteristics and enrollment outcomes, outperforming existing machine learning techniques.

This research has the potential to significantly impact the drug development process by enabling more efficient and targeted patient recruitment strategies. By accurately forecasting enrollment success, researchers can better allocate resources, adjust trial designs, and ultimately bring new treatments to patients more quickly.

As the field of AI continues to evolve, tools like TrialEnroll will play an increasingly important role in streamlining the clinical trial process and accelerating the development of life-saving therapies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

TrialEnroll: Predicting Clinical Trial Enrollment Success with Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models
Total Score

0

TrialEnroll: Predicting Clinical Trial Enrollment Success with Deep & Cross Network and Large Language Models

Ling Yue, Sixue Xing, Jintai Chen, Tianfan Fu

Clinical trials need to recruit a sufficient number of volunteer patients to demonstrate the statistical power of the treatment (e.g., a new drug) in curing a certain disease. Clinical trial recruitment has a significant impact on trial success. Forecasting whether the recruitment process would be successful before we run the trial would save many resources and time. This paper develops a novel deep & cross network with large language model (LLM)-augmented text feature that learns semantic information from trial eligibility criteria and predicts enrollment success. The proposed method enables interpretability by understanding which sentence/word in eligibility criteria contributes heavily to prediction. We also demonstrate the empirical superiority of the proposed method (0.7002 PR-AUC) over a bunch of well-established machine learning methods. The code and curated dataset are publicly available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/TrialEnroll-7E12.

Read more

7/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Models

Qiao Jin, Zifeng Wang, Charalampos S. Floudas, Fangyuan Chen, Changlin Gong, Dara Bracken-Clarke, Elisabetta Xue, Yifan Yang, Jimeng Sun, Zhiyong Lu

Clinical trials are often hindered by the challenge of patient recruitment. In this work, we introduce TrialGPT, a first-of-its-kind large language model (LLM) framework to assist patient-to-trial matching. Given a patient note, TrialGPT predicts the patient's eligibility on a criterion-by-criterion basis and then consolidates these predictions to assess the patient's eligibility for the target trial. We evaluate the trial-level prediction performance of TrialGPT on three publicly available cohorts of 184 patients with over 18,000 trial annotations. We also engaged three physicians to label over 1,000 patient-criterion pairs to assess its criterion-level prediction accuracy. Experimental results show that TrialGPT achieves a criterion-level accuracy of 87.3% with faithful explanations, close to the expert performance (88.7%-90.0%). The aggregated TrialGPT scores are highly correlated with human eligibility judgments, and they outperform the best-competing models by 32.6% to 57.2% in ranking and excluding clinical trials. Furthermore, our user study reveals that TrialGPT can significantly reduce the screening time (by 42.6%) in a real-life clinical trial matching task. These results and analyses have demonstrated promising opportunities for clinical trial matching with LLMs such as TrialGPT.

Read more

4/30/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Language Interaction Network for Clinical Trial Approval Estimation

Chufan Gao, Tianfan Fu, Jimeng Sun

Clinical trial outcome prediction seeks to estimate the likelihood that a clinical trial will successfully reach its intended endpoint. This process predominantly involves the development of machine learning models that utilize a variety of data sources such as descriptions of the clinical trials, characteristics of the drug molecules, and specific disease conditions being targeted. Accurate predictions of trial outcomes are crucial for optimizing trial planning and prioritizing investments in a drug portfolio. While previous research has largely concentrated on small-molecule drugs, there is a growing need to focus on biologics-a rapidly expanding category of therapeutic agents that often lack the well-defined molecular properties associated with traditional drugs. Additionally, applying conventional methods like graph neural networks to biologics data proves challenging due to their complex nature. To address these challenges, we introduce the Language Interaction Network (LINT), a novel approach that predicts trial outcomes using only the free-text descriptions of the trials. We have rigorously tested the effectiveness of LINT across three phases of clinical trials, where it achieved ROC-AUC scores of 0.770, 0.740, and 0.748 for phases I, II, and III, respectively, specifically concerning trials involving biologic interventions.

Read more

5/14/2024

End-To-End Clinical Trial Matching with Large Language Models
Total Score

0

End-To-End Clinical Trial Matching with Large Language Models

Dyke Ferber, Lars Hilgers, Isabella C. Wiest, Marie-Elisabeth Le{ss}mann, Jan Clusmann, Peter Neidlinger, Jiefu Zhu, Georg Wolflein, Jacqueline Lammert, Maximilian Tschochohei, Heiko Bohme, Dirk Jager, Mihaela Aldea, Daniel Truhn, Christiane Hoper, Jakob Nikolas Kather

Matching cancer patients to clinical trials is essential for advancing treatment and patient care. However, the inconsistent format of medical free text documents and complex trial eligibility criteria make this process extremely challenging and time-consuming for physicians. We investigated whether the entire trial matching process - from identifying relevant trials among 105,600 oncology-related clinical trials on clinicaltrials.gov to generating criterion-level eligibility matches - could be automated using Large Language Models (LLMs). Using GPT-4o and a set of 51 synthetic Electronic Health Records (EHRs), we demonstrate that our approach identifies relevant candidate trials in 93.3% of cases and achieves a preliminary accuracy of 88.0% when matching patient-level information at the criterion level against a baseline defined by human experts. Utilizing LLM feedback reveals that 39.3% criteria that were initially considered incorrect are either ambiguous or inaccurately annotated, leading to a total model accuracy of 92.7% after refining our human baseline. In summary, we present an end-to-end pipeline for clinical trial matching using LLMs, demonstrating high precision in screening and matching trials to individual patients, even outperforming the performance of qualified medical doctors. Our fully end-to-end pipeline can operate autonomously or with human supervision and is not restricted to oncology, offering a scalable solution for enhancing patient-trial matching in real-world settings.

Read more

7/19/2024