Trustworthy Classification through Rank-Based Conformal Prediction Sets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach called "Rank-Based Conformal Prediction Sets" (RBCPS) for trustworthy classification tasks.
- RBCPS provides probabilistic classification outputs that are well-calibrated and more informative than traditional classification methods.
- The method leverages conformal prediction to construct prediction sets that capture the uncertainty in the classification.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called "Rank-Based Conformal Prediction Sets" (RBCPS) that aims to make machine learning-based classification more trustworthy and informative. Traditional classification models often provide a single predicted class label, which can be misleading if the model is uncertain about the prediction.
RBCPS addresses this by constructing prediction sets - a collection of possible class labels for each input, along with a measure of confidence in the prediction. This allows the model to convey its uncertainty, rather than just providing a single, potentially unreliable, class label.
The key innovation is that RBCPS uses the ranking of class scores produced by the classifier, rather than just the raw scores. This ranking-based approach helps the model better capture the relative differences between the class scores, which provides more informative and well-calibrated prediction sets.
By giving users a sense of the model's uncertainty, RBCPS can help build trust in the classification system and enable more informed decision-making. This is particularly important in high-stakes applications where the consequences of errors can be severe.
Technical Explanation
The RBCPS approach constructs conformal prediction sets using a ranking-based nonconformity measure. Traditional conformal prediction relies on a nonconformity measure that quantifies how "unusual" a given input-label pair is compared to the training data.
RBCPS introduces a new nonconformity measure that considers the ranking of the class scores produced by the classifier, rather than just the raw scores. This ranking-based nonconformity measure better captures the relative differences between the class scores, leading to more informative and well-calibrated prediction sets.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of RBCPS through experiments on several benchmark datasets, showing that it outperforms other conformal prediction methods in terms of calibration (the alignment between predicted and observed error rates) and efficiency (the size of the prediction sets).
Furthermore, the authors show that RBCPS can be applied to a variety of classifier architectures, including deep neural networks, making it a versatile and widely applicable technique for trustworthy classification.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the RBCPS method and highlights its advantages over existing conformal prediction approaches. However, the authors acknowledge some limitations and areas for future research:
- The paper focuses on single-label classification tasks, but many real-world problems involve multi-label classification. Extending RBCPS to the multi-label setting could further enhance its practical applicability.
- The authors note that the computational complexity of RBCPS may be higher than some other conformal prediction methods, especially for large-scale datasets. Investigating more efficient implementation strategies could be an important area of future work.
- While the paper demonstrates the benefits of RBCPS in terms of calibration and efficiency, it would be valuable to also assess the impact of this approach on human decision-making and trust in the classification system. Conducting user studies or field trials could provide valuable insights in this regard.
Overall, the RBCPS method presented in this paper represents a promising step forward in building more trustworthy and informative classification systems. The ranking-based approach offers a compelling way to capture model uncertainty and could have significant implications for a wide range of high-stakes applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new technique called "Rank-Based Conformal Prediction Sets" (RBCPS) that aims to make machine learning-based classification more trustworthy and informative. By constructing prediction sets that capture the model's uncertainty, RBCPS can help build trust in the classification system and enable more informed decision-making.
The key innovation of RBCPS is its use of a ranking-based nonconformity measure, which better captures the relative differences between the class scores produced by the classifier. This leads to more well-calibrated and efficient prediction sets compared to other conformal prediction methods.
The paper presents a thorough evaluation of RBCPS, demonstrating its effectiveness on several benchmark datasets. While the authors acknowledge some limitations and areas for future research, the proposed approach represents an important step forward in developing more trustworthy and transparent classification systems, with the potential to have significant real-world impact.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Trustworthy Classification through Rank-Based Conformal Prediction Sets
Rui Luo, Zhixin Zhou
Machine learning classification tasks often benefit from predicting a set of possible labels with confidence scores to capture uncertainty. However, existing methods struggle with the high-dimensional nature of the data and the lack of well-calibrated probabilities from modern classification models. We propose a novel conformal prediction method that employs a rank-based score function suitable for classification models that predict the order of labels correctly, even if not well-calibrated. Our approach constructs prediction sets that achieve the desired coverage rate while managing their size. We provide a theoretical analysis of the expected size of the conformal prediction sets based on the rank distribution of the underlying classifier. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that our method outperforms existing techniques on various datasets, providing reliable uncertainty quantification. Our contributions include a novel conformal prediction method, theoretical analysis, and empirical evaluation. This work advances the practical deployment of machine learning systems by enabling reliable uncertainty quantification.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Conformal Prediction for Deep Classifier via Label Ranking
Jianguo Huang, Huajun Xi, Linjun Zhang, Huaxiu Yao, Yue Qiu, Hongxin Wei
Conformal prediction is a statistical framework that generates prediction sets containing ground-truth labels with a desired coverage guarantee. The predicted probabilities produced by machine learning models are generally miscalibrated, leading to large prediction sets in conformal prediction. To address this issue, we propose a novel algorithm named $textit{Sorted Adaptive Prediction Sets}$ (SAPS), which discards all the probability values except for the maximum softmax probability. The key idea behind SAPS is to minimize the dependence of the non-conformity score on the probability values while retaining the uncertainty information. In this manner, SAPS can produce compact prediction sets and communicate instance-wise uncertainty. Extensive experiments validate that SAPS not only lessens the prediction sets but also broadly enhances the conditional coverage rate of prediction sets.
Read more6/7/2024
1
Conformal Prediction Sets Improve Human Decision Making
Jesse C. Cresswell, Yi Sui, Bhargava Kumar, Noel Vouitsis
In response to everyday queries, humans explicitly signal uncertainty and offer alternative answers when they are unsure. Machine learning models that output calibrated prediction sets through conformal prediction mimic this human behaviour; larger sets signal greater uncertainty while providing alternatives. In this work, we study the usefulness of conformal prediction sets as an aid for human decision making by conducting a pre-registered randomized controlled trial with conformal prediction sets provided to human subjects. With statistical significance, we find that when humans are given conformal prediction sets their accuracy on tasks improves compared to fixed-size prediction sets with the same coverage guarantee. The results show that quantifying model uncertainty with conformal prediction is helpful for human-in-the-loop decision making and human-AI teams.
Read more6/11/2024
0
A conformalized learning of a prediction set with applications to medical imaging classification
Roy Hirsch, Jacob Goldberger
Medical imaging classifiers can achieve high predictive accuracy, but quantifying their uncertainty remains an unresolved challenge, which prevents their deployment in medical clinics. We present an algorithm that can modify any classifier to produce a prediction set containing the true label with a user-specified probability, such as 90%. We train a network to predict an instance-based version of the Conformal Prediction threshold. The threshold is then conformalized to ensure the required coverage. We applied the proposed algorithm to several standard medical imaging classification datasets. The experimental results demonstrate that our method outperforms current approaches in terms of smaller average size of the prediction set while maintaining the desired coverage.
Read more8/12/2024