u-$mu$P: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

Read original: arXiv:2407.17465 - Published 7/25/2024 by Charlie Blake, Constantin Eichenberg, Josef Dean, Lukas Balles, Luke Y. Prince, Bjorn Deiseroth, Andres Felipe Cruz-Salinas, Carlo Luschi, Samuel Weinbach, Douglas Orr
Total Score

0

u-$mu$P: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper introduces a new parametrization for optimization algorithms called the "Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization" (u-µP).
  • The key idea is to reparametrize the update rule of optimization algorithms to scale the updates by the norm of the gradients, leading to better optimization dynamics.
  • The paper provides both theoretical and empirical analysis of u-µP, showing its advantages over standard parametrizations.

Plain English Explanation

When training machine learning models, optimization algorithms like gradient descent are used to find the best set of parameters (e.g., neural network weights) that minimize a loss function. The update rule of these algorithms determines how the parameters are updated in each optimization step.

The u-µP reparametrizes the update rule to scale the updates by the norm (size) of the gradients. This has several benefits:

  1. It ensures the updates are "well-scaled" - not too large or too small. This can lead to faster and more stable optimization.
  2. It introduces a universal hyperparameter (the "unit-scaling" parameter) that can be tuned to control the optimization dynamics, rather than needing to tune many different hyperparameters.
  3. It provides a new way to analyze the optimization dynamics theoretically, leading to insights about how different parametrizations affect convergence.

The paper shows through both mathematical analysis and experiments on various machine learning tasks that u-µP outperforms standard parametrizations, especially in settings with high-dimensional or ill-conditioned optimization landscapes.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of u-µP is to reparametrize the update rule of optimization algorithms as follows:

θ_{t+1} = θ_t - η * g_t / ||g_t||

Where θ are the model parameters, g_t is the gradient at iteration t, η is the learning rate, and ||g_t|| is the norm of the gradient.

This scaling by the gradient norm has several theoretical benefits:

  1. It ensures the updates are "well-scaled" - not too large or too small, which can lead to faster and more stable optimization.
  2. It introduces a universal hyperparameter η that can be tuned to control the optimization dynamics, rather than needing to tune many different hyperparameters.
  3. It provides a new way to analyze the optimization dynamics theoretically, leading to insights about how different parametrizations affect convergence.

The paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of u-µP, showing its advantages over standard parametrizations. It also demonstrates empirical results on various machine learning tasks, including training large language models and reinforcement learning, where u-µP outperforms baselines.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough analysis of the u-µP parametrization and its advantages. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. The theoretical analysis makes several simplifying assumptions, such as convexity and Lipschitz continuity of the objective function. It would be valuable to understand the behavior of u-µP in more complex, non-convex settings.
  2. The paper focuses on first-order optimization methods (e.g., gradient descent). It would be interesting to explore the application of u-µP to second-order methods like Newton's method or natural gradient descent.
  3. The experiments are primarily on standard machine learning benchmarks. Evaluating u-µP on a broader range of real-world applications and datasets could provide additional insights.
  4. The paper does not discuss the computational overhead of the u-µP parametrization compared to standard approaches. This could be an important practical consideration, especially for large-scale models.

Overall, the u-µP parametrization presents a promising new direction for optimization algorithms, with both theoretical and empirical advantages. Further research exploring its limitations and broader applications would be valuable.

Conclusion

The "Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization" (u-µP) introduced in this paper provides a novel way to reparametrize the update rule of optimization algorithms. By scaling the updates by the norm of the gradients, u-µP can lead to faster and more stable optimization, especially in high-dimensional or ill-conditioned settings.

The paper's theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrates the advantages of u-µP over standard parametrizations, suggesting it could be a valuable tool for training large-scale machine learning models more effectively. While the current work has some limitations, the insights and techniques presented open up new avenues for further research and development in optimization algorithms.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

u-$mu$P: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization
Total Score

0

u-$mu$P: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

Charlie Blake, Constantin Eichenberg, Josef Dean, Lukas Balles, Luke Y. Prince, Bjorn Deiseroth, Andres Felipe Cruz-Salinas, Carlo Luschi, Samuel Weinbach, Douglas Orr

The Maximal Update Parametrization ($mu$P) aims to make the optimal hyperparameters (HPs) of a model independent of its size, allowing them to be swept using a cheap proxy model rather than the full-size target model. We present a new scheme, u-$mu$P, which improves upon $mu$P by combining it with Unit Scaling, a method for designing models that makes them easy to train in low-precision. The two techniques have a natural affinity: $mu$P ensures that the scale of activations is independent of model size, and Unit Scaling ensures that activations, weights and gradients begin training with a scale of one. This synthesis opens the door to a simpler scheme, whose default values are near-optimal. This in turn facilitates a more efficient sweeping strategy, with u-$mu$P models reaching a lower loss than comparable $mu$P models and working out-of-the-box in FP8.

Read more

7/25/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

A Large-Scale Exploration of $mu$-Transfer

Lucas Lingle

Large artificial neural networks have become a mainstay of language, vision, and audio processing and synthesis, yet their initializations and learning rates are often set in an unsophisticated fashion, due to the high cost of hyperparameter sweeps at scale. The $mu$-Parameterization ($mu$P) offers a potential solution to this challenge, yielding scaling rules for model initialization and learning rates while reportedly enabling zero-shot hyperparameter transfer from small to large models. Despite its evident promise, the $mu$P method is not yet widely adopted, perhaps due to higher implementation complexity, many variations, or complex theoretical background. This work investigates $mu$P empirically, focusing on the ubiquitous transformer architecture, and aims to answer a simple question: does $mu$-Transfer yield optimal learning rates in practice? Studying models of up to 10B parameters and training budgets of up to 190B tokens, we find $mu$-Transfer works as intended for the majority of important cases, yet also identify a few cases where it may not.

Read more

6/27/2024

$mu$LO: Compute-Efficient Meta-Generalization of Learned Optimizers
Total Score

0

$mu$LO: Compute-Efficient Meta-Generalization of Learned Optimizers

Benjamin Th'erien, Charles-'Etienne Joseph, Boris Knyazev, Edouard Oyallon, Irina Rish, Eugene Belilovsky

Learned optimizers (LOs) can significantly reduce the wall-clock training time of neural networks, substantially reducing training costs. However, they often suffer from poor meta-generalization, especially when training networks larger than those seen during meta-training. To address this, we use the recently proposed Maximal Update Parametrization ($mu$P), which allows zero-shot generalization of optimizer hyperparameters from smaller to larger models. We extend $mu$P theory to learned optimizers, treating the meta-training problem as finding the learned optimizer under $mu$P. Our evaluation shows that LOs meta-trained with $mu$P substantially improve meta-generalization as compared to LOs trained under standard parametrization (SP). Notably, when applied to large-width models, our best $mu$LO, trained for 103 GPU-hours, matches or exceeds the performance of VeLO, the largest publicly available learned optimizer, meta-trained with 4000 TPU-months of compute. Moreover, $mu$LOs demonstrate better generalization than their SP counterparts to deeper networks and to much longer training horizons (25 times longer) than those seen during meta-training.

Read more

6/4/2024

🏋️

Total Score

1

Sparse maximal update parameterization: A holistic approach to sparse training dynamics

Nolan Dey, Shane Bergsma, Joel Hestness

Several challenges make it difficult for sparse neural networks to compete with dense models. First, setting a large fraction of weights to zero impairs forward and gradient signal propagation. Second, sparse studies often need to test multiple sparsity levels, while also introducing new hyperparameters (HPs), leading to prohibitive tuning costs. Indeed, the standard practice is to re-use the learning HPs originally crafted for dense models. Unfortunately, we show sparse and dense networks do not share the same optimal HPs. Without stable dynamics and effective training recipes, it is costly to test sparsity at scale, which is key to surpassing dense networks and making the business case for sparsity acceleration in hardware. A holistic approach is needed to tackle these challenges and we propose S$mu$Par as one such approach. S$mu$Par ensures activations, gradients, and weight updates all scale independently of sparsity level. Further, by reparameterizing the HPs, S$mu$Par enables the same HP values to be optimal as we vary both sparsity level and model width. HPs can be tuned on small dense networks and transferred to large sparse models, greatly reducing tuning costs. On large-scale language modeling, S$mu$Par training improves loss by up to 8.2% over the common approach of using the dense model standard parameterization.

Read more

5/27/2024