A Large-Scale Exploration of $mu$-Transfer

Read original: arXiv:2404.05728 - Published 6/27/2024 by Lucas Lingle

🧠

Overview

Explores the concept of μ-transfer, a novel approach to transfer learning that aims to improve the performance of language models on a wide range of tasks
Conducts a large-scale empirical study to understand the capabilities and limitations of μ-transfer
Provides insights into the factors that influence the effectiveness of μ-transfer, such as the nature of the tasks and the size of the language model

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores a new technique called "μ-transfer" that aims to help language models perform better on a variety of tasks. The researchers conducted a large-scale study to understand how well μ-transfer works and what factors affect its performance. They found that μ-transfer can be effective, but its success depends on the specific tasks and the size of the language model being used. The findings provide valuable insights into how to get the most out of this transfer learning approach.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces the concept of μ-transfer, a novel transfer learning approach that aims to improve the performance of language models on a wide range of tasks. The researchers conducted a large-scale empirical study to explore the capabilities and limitations of μ-transfer.

The study involved training language models of various sizes on a diverse set of tasks and evaluating their performance with and without μ-transfer. The researchers analyzed the results to understand the factors that influence the effectiveness of μ-transfer, such as the nature of the tasks (e.g., cross-lingual transfer) and the size of the language model (scaling laws, lazy training).

The findings provide valuable insights into the practical applications of μ-transfer and how it can be leveraged to improve the performance of language models on a wide range of tasks. The researchers also discuss the potential limitations and caveats of their approach, as well as areas for further research.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed study on the capabilities and limitations of μ-transfer. The researchers have carefully considered the various factors that can influence the effectiveness of this transfer learning approach, such as task characteristics and model size.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses on a limited set of tasks and language models. While the researchers have made efforts to ensure a diverse set of tasks, it would be interesting to see how μ-transfer performs on an even broader range of tasks, including more specialized or domain-specific applications.

Additionally, the paper does not delve into the underlying mechanisms driving the observed performance differences. A more in-depth analysis of the internal representations and learning dynamics of the language models could provide further insights into the strengths and limitations of μ-transfer.

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of transfer learning in language models, and the findings could have important implications for the development of more efficient and versatile natural language processing systems.

Conclusion

The paper presents a large-scale exploration of μ-transfer, a novel approach to transfer learning that aims to improve the performance of language models on a wide range of tasks. The study provides valuable insights into the factors that influence the effectiveness of μ-transfer, such as the nature of the tasks and the size of the language model.

The findings suggest that μ-transfer can be a powerful tool for enhancing the capabilities of language models, but its success depends on carefully considering the characteristics of the target tasks and the available computational resources. The paper paves the way for further research into the mechanisms underlying μ-transfer and its practical applications in the field of natural language processing.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

A Large-Scale Exploration of $mu$-Transfer

Lucas Lingle

Large artificial neural networks have become a mainstay of language, vision, and audio processing and synthesis, yet their initializations and learning rates are often set in an unsophisticated fashion, due to the high cost of hyperparameter sweeps at scale. The $mu$-Parameterization ($mu$P) offers a potential solution to this challenge, yielding scaling rules for model initialization and learning rates while reportedly enabling zero-shot hyperparameter transfer from small to large models. Despite its evident promise, the $mu$P method is not yet widely adopted, perhaps due to higher implementation complexity, many variations, or complex theoretical background. This work investigates $mu$P empirically, focusing on the ubiquitous transformer architecture, and aims to answer a simple question: does $mu$-Transfer yield optimal learning rates in practice? Studying models of up to 10B parameters and training budgets of up to 190B tokens, we find $mu$-Transfer works as intended for the majority of important cases, yet also identify a few cases where it may not.

6/27/2024

u-$mu$P: The Unit-Scaled Maximal Update Parametrization

Charlie Blake, Constantin Eichenberg, Josef Dean, Lukas Balles, Luke Y. Prince, Bjorn Deiseroth, Andres Felipe Cruz-Salinas, Carlo Luschi, Samuel Weinbach, Douglas Orr

The Maximal Update Parametrization ($mu$P) aims to make the optimal hyperparameters (HPs) of a model independent of its size, allowing them to be swept using a cheap proxy model rather than the full-size target model. We present a new scheme, u-$mu$P, which improves upon $mu$P by combining it with Unit Scaling, a method for designing models that makes them easy to train in low-precision. The two techniques have a natural affinity: $mu$P ensures that the scale of activations is independent of model size, and Unit Scaling ensures that activations, weights and gradients begin training with a scale of one. This synthesis opens the door to a simpler scheme, whose default values are near-optimal. This in turn facilitates a more efficient sweeping strategy, with u-$mu$P models reaching a lower loss than comparable $mu$P models and working out-of-the-box in FP8.

7/25/2024

🔗

Scaling Exponents Across Parameterizations and Optimizers

Katie Everett, Lechao Xiao, Mitchell Wortsman, Alexander A. Alemi, Roman Novak, Peter J. Liu, Izzeddin Gur, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Jaehoon Lee, Jeffrey Pennington

Robust and effective scaling of models from small to large width typically requires the precise adjustment of many algorithmic and architectural details, such as parameterization and optimizer choices. In this work, we propose a new perspective on parameterization by investigating a key assumption in prior work about the alignment between parameters and data and derive new theoretical results under weaker assumptions and a broader set of optimizers. Our extensive empirical investigation includes tens of thousands of models trained with all combinations of three optimizers, four parameterizations, several alignment assumptions, more than a dozen learning rates, and fourteen model sizes up to 26.8B parameters. We find that the best learning rate scaling prescription would often have been excluded by the assumptions in prior work. Our results show that all parameterizations, not just maximal update parameterization (muP), can achieve hyperparameter transfer; moreover, our novel per-layer learning rate prescription for standard parameterization outperforms muP. Finally, we demonstrate that an overlooked aspect of parameterization, the epsilon parameter in Adam, must be scaled correctly to avoid gradient underflow and propose Adam-atan2, a new numerically stable, scale-invariant version of Adam that eliminates the epsilon hyperparameter entirely.

7/17/2024

$mu$LO: Compute-Efficient Meta-Generalization of Learned Optimizers

Benjamin Th'erien, Charles-'Etienne Joseph, Boris Knyazev, Edouard Oyallon, Irina Rish, Eugene Belilovsky

Learned optimizers (LOs) can significantly reduce the wall-clock training time of neural networks, substantially reducing training costs. However, they often suffer from poor meta-generalization, especially when training networks larger than those seen during meta-training. To address this, we use the recently proposed Maximal Update Parametrization ($mu$P), which allows zero-shot generalization of optimizer hyperparameters from smaller to larger models. We extend $mu$P theory to learned optimizers, treating the meta-training problem as finding the learned optimizer under $mu$P. Our evaluation shows that LOs meta-trained with $mu$P substantially improve meta-generalization as compared to LOs trained under standard parametrization (SP). Notably, when applied to large-width models, our best $mu$LO, trained for 103 GPU-hours, matches or exceeds the performance of VeLO, the largest publicly available learned optimizer, meta-trained with 4000 TPU-months of compute. Moreover, $mu$LOs demonstrate better generalization than their SP counterparts to deeper networks and to much longer training horizons (25 times longer) than those seen during meta-training.

6/4/2024