Uncovering communities of pipelines in the task-fMRI analytical space
2312.06231
0
0
Abstract
Analytical workflows in functional magnetic resonance imaging are highly flexible with limited best practices as to how to choose a pipeline. While it has been shown that the use of different pipelines might lead to different results, there is still a lack of understanding of the factors that drive these differences and of the stability of these differences across contexts. We use community detection algorithms to explore the pipeline space and assess the stability of pipeline relationships across different contexts. We show that there are subsets of pipelines that give similar results, especially those sharing specific parameters (e.g. number of motion regressors, software packages, etc.). Those pipeline-to-pipeline patterns are stable across groups of participants but not across different tasks. By visualizing the differences between communities, we show that the pipeline space is mainly driven by the size of the activation area in the brain and the scale of statistic values in statistic maps.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the variability in analysis pipelines used for task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies.
- The researchers used a community detection algorithm to uncover groups of similar pipelines, revealing the underlying structure of the analytical space.
- The findings suggest that there is substantial diversity in the approaches used to analyze task-fMRI data, which can contribute to the variability in reported results across studies.
Plain English Explanation
When researchers conduct fMRI studies to investigate how the brain responds to different tasks, they use a series of data processing steps, called a "pipeline," to analyze the brain scan data. However, there can be a lot of variation in the specific pipelines that researchers choose to use.
This paper looks at the diversity of these analysis pipelines and tries to uncover patterns or "communities" of similar pipelines. The researchers applied a community detection algorithm to a large dataset of task-fMRI pipelines, allowing them to identify groups of pipelines that share common characteristics.
The key finding is that there is significant variability in the analysis approaches used by different researchers. While some common practices emerge, there is also a lot of diversity in how task-fMRI data is processed and analyzed. This variability in pipelines can contribute to the differences in results that are sometimes seen across fMRI studies, even when looking at the same cognitive processes.
By revealing the structure of the analytical space, this research provides insights into the sources of variability in fMRI findings. Understanding these pipeline communities can help researchers make more informed choices about their analysis methods and improve the reproducibility of neuroimaging research.
Technical Explanation
The researchers compiled a large dataset of over 2,000 task-fMRI analysis pipelines from various online repositories. They represented each pipeline as a vector of binary features describing the processing steps used, such as motion correction, spatial smoothing, and statistical modeling.
Using a community detection algorithm known as the Louvain method, the researchers identified distinct groups or "communities" of similar pipelines within this high-dimensional feature space. The resulting communities revealed the underlying structure of the task-fMRI analytical landscape, highlighting the substantial diversity in the approaches used by researchers.
Further analysis showed that the pipeline communities differed in various properties, such as the degree of preprocessing, the choice of statistical models, and the handling of nuisance variables. This suggests that the observed variability in fMRI results may be partly attributable to the differences in analytical decisions made by researchers.
By uncovering these pipeline communities, the study provides a better understanding of the sources of analytical variability in task-fMRI research. This knowledge can inform efforts to improve the reproducibility of neuroimaging findings, such as by identifying best practices or developing more standardized analysis workflows.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling analysis of the diversity in task-fMRI analysis pipelines, which is an important issue for the field of neuroimaging. The community detection approach offers a novel and insightful way to uncover the underlying structure of the analytical space, revealing patterns that would be difficult to discern through manual inspection alone.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential implications of this variability for the interpretation and generalization of fMRI findings. While the authors acknowledge that the observed pipeline differences may contribute to the variability in reported results, they do not thoroughly explore the magnitude or specific mechanisms by which this occurs.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or limitations in the pipeline dataset itself. The researchers relied on publicly available repositories, which may not be representative of the full spectrum of analysis approaches used in the field. There could be differences between the pipelines shared online and those used in less visible or unpublished studies.
Further research is needed to understand the impact of pipeline variability on the validity and reliability of fMRI conclusions, as well as to develop more robust and standardized analysis frameworks that can reduce the influence of analytical decisions on the final results.
Conclusion
This paper takes an important step in uncovering the diversity of analysis pipelines used in task-fMRI research. By applying a community detection algorithm, the researchers were able to reveal the underlying structure of the analytical space, highlighting the substantial variability in the approaches employed by different researchers.
The findings have significant implications for the field of neuroimaging, as they suggest that the variability in analysis pipelines may be a contributing factor to the inconsistencies sometimes observed in fMRI findings. By providing a better understanding of the sources of this variability, this research can inform efforts to improve the reproducibility and reliability of task-fMRI studies, ultimately leading to more robust and trustworthy insights into the workings of the human brain.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Mitigating analytical variability in fMRI results with style transfer
Elodie Germani (EMPENN, LACODAM), Elisa Fromont (LACODAM), Camille Maumet (EMPENN)
0
0
We propose a novel approach to improve the reproducibility of neuroimaging results by converting statistic maps across different functional MRI pipelines. We make the assumption that pipelines can be considered as a style component of data and propose to use different generative models, among which, Diffusion Models (DM) to convert data between pipelines. We design a new DM-based unsupervised multi-domain image-to-image transition framework and constrain the generation of 3D fMRI statistic maps using the latent space of an auxiliary classifier that distinguishes statistic maps from different pipelines. We extend traditional sampling techniques used in DM to improve the transition performance. Our experiments demonstrate that our proposed methods are successful: pipelines can indeed be transferred, providing an important source of data augmentation for future medical studies.
4/8/2024
🤔
A sensitivity analysis to quantify the impact of neuroimaging preprocessing strategies on subsequent statistical analyses
Brize Ozenne, Martin Norgaard, Cyril Pernet, Melanie Ganz
0
0
Even though novel imaging techniques have been successful in studying brain structure and function, the measured biological signals are often contaminated by multiple sources of noise, arising due to e.g. head movements of the individual being scanned, limited spatial/temporal resolution, or other issues specific to each imaging technology. Data preprocessing (e.g. denoising) is therefore critical. Preprocessing pipelines have become increasingly complex over the years, but also more flexible, and this flexibility can have a significant impact on the final results and conclusions of a given study. This large parameter space is often referred to as multiverse analyses. Here, we provide conceptual and practical tools for statistical analyses that can aggregate multiple pipeline results along with a new sensitivity analysis testing for hypotheses across pipelines such as no effect across all pipelines or at least one pipeline with no effect. The proposed framework is generic and can be applied to any multiverse scenario, but we illustrate its use based on positron emission tomography data.
4/24/2024
🤯
Latent. Functional Map
Marco Fumero, Marco Pegoraro, Valentino Maiorca, Francesco Locatello, Emanuele Rodol`a
0
0
Neural models learn data representations that lie on low-dimensional manifolds, yet modeling the relation between these representational spaces is an ongoing challenge. By integrating spectral geometry principles into neural modeling, we show that this problem can be better addressed in the functional domain, mitigating complexity, while enhancing interpretability and performances on downstream tasks. To this end, we introduce a multi-purpose framework to the representation learning community, which allows to: (i) compare different spaces in an interpretable way and measure their intrinsic similarity; (ii) find correspondences between them, both in unsupervised and weakly supervised settings, and (iii) to effectively transfer representations between distinct spaces. We validate our framework on various applications, ranging from stitching to retrieval tasks, demonstrating that latent functional maps can serve as a swiss-army knife for representation alignment.
6/24/2024
New!Deconvolving Complex Neuronal Networks into Interpretable Task-Specific Connectomes
Yifan Wang, Vikram Ravindra, Ananth Grama
0
0
Task-specific functional MRI (fMRI) images provide excellent modalities for studying the neuronal basis of cognitive processes. We use fMRI data to formulate and solve the problem of deconvolving task-specific aggregate neuronal networks into a set of basic building blocks called canonical networks, to use these networks for functional characterization, and to characterize the physiological basis of these responses by mapping them to regions of the brain. Our results show excellent task-specificity of canonical networks, i.e., the expression of a small number of canonical networks can be used to accurately predict tasks; generalizability across cohorts, i.e., canonical networks are conserved across diverse populations, studies, and acquisition protocols; and that canonical networks have strong anatomical and physiological basis. From a methods perspective, the problem of identifying these canonical networks poses challenges rooted in the high dimensionality, small sample size, acquisition variability, and noise. Our deconvolution technique is based on non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) that identifies canonical networks as factors of a suitably constructed matrix. We demonstrate that our method scales to large datasets, yields stable and accurate factors, and is robust to noise.
7/2/2024