Uncovering Safety Risks in Open-source LLMs through Concept Activation Vector
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) to uncover potential safety risks in open-source large language models (LLMs).
- CAVs are a technique that can identify high-level concepts learned by AI models, which can be used to assess their behavior and potentially identify safety issues.
- The researchers apply CAVs to analyze the behavior of several open-source LLMs, including GPT-J, OPT, and Whisper.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at open-source large language models (LLMs) - powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. The researchers use a technique called Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) to try to uncover potential safety risks in these models.
CAVs can identify high-level concepts that the models have learned, like "safety" or "violence." By analyzing these concepts, the researchers hope to spot areas where the models may behave in unsafe or undesirable ways.
They apply this CAV analysis to several popular open-source LLMs, including GPT-J, OPT, and Whisper. The goal is to provide a way to assess the safety and trustworthiness of these models, which are becoming increasingly important as they are used in more applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a method for using Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) to analyze the behavior of open-source large language models (LLMs). CAVs are a technique that can identify high-level concepts learned by AI models, which can then be used to assess their behavior and potentially identify safety issues.
The researchers apply CAVs to analyze the behavior of several open-source LLMs, including GPT-J, OPT, and Whisper. They describe the process of defining relevant concepts, computing CAVs for the models, and using the CAVs to identify potential safety risks.
The paper presents several case studies where the CAV analysis uncovered concerning behaviors in the LLMs, such as the promotion of harmful ideologies or the generation of explicit content. The researchers argue that this type of analysis can provide valuable insights into the safety and trustworthiness of open-source LLMs, which are becoming increasingly important as they are deployed in a wide range of applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and potentially useful approach for assessing the safety of open-source LLMs. The use of CAVs to identify high-level concepts learned by the models is an interesting idea, and the case studies provided offer some evidence that this method can uncover meaningful safety issues.
However, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and caveats. The selection of relevant concepts to analyze is a subjective process, and the researchers note that their approach may miss potential safety risks that are not captured by the chosen concepts. Additionally, the paper does not address the potential for adversarial attacks or other ways in which the CAV analysis could be subverted or manipulated.
Further research would be needed to fully validate the effectiveness of this approach and to explore its broader applicability to a wider range of LLMs and use cases. As with any tool for assessing AI safety, it is important to consider the limitations and potential pitfalls, and to always maintain a critical and objective mindset when interpreting the results.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for using Concept Activation Vectors (CAVs) to uncover potential safety risks in open-source large language models (LLMs). The researchers demonstrate the application of this technique to several popular LLMs, revealing concerning behaviors that could have significant implications for the safety and trustworthiness of these models.
The CAV analysis provides a way to assess LLMs at a higher level of abstraction, beyond just looking at their outputs or performance on specific tasks. By identifying the high-level concepts learned by the models, this approach offers a more holistic view of their behavior and potential safety issues.
As open-source LLMs continue to grow in importance and influence, tools like the one described in this paper will be crucial for ensuring their safety and responsible development. While the approach has limitations and requires further research, it represents an important step towards a more comprehensive understanding of the risks and challenges associated with these powerful AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Uncovering Safety Risks in Open-source LLMs through Concept Activation Vector
Zhihao Xu, Ruixuan Huang, Shuai Wang, Xiting Wang
Despite careful safety alignment, current large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to various attacks. To further unveil the safety risks of LLMs, we introduce a Safety Concept Activation Vector (SCAV) framework, which effectively guides the attacks by accurately interpreting LLMs' safety mechanisms. We then develop an SCAV-guided attack method that can generate both attack prompts and embedding-level attacks with automatically selected perturbation hyperparameters. Both automatic and human evaluations demonstrate that our attack method significantly improves the attack success rate and response quality while requiring less training data. Additionally, we find that our generated attack prompts may be transferable to GPT-4, and the embedding-level attacks may also be transferred to other white-box LLMs whose parameters are known. Our experiments further uncover the safety risks present in current LLMs. For example, we find that six out of seven open-source LLMs that we attack consistently provide relevant answers to more than 85% malicious instructions. Finally, we provide insights into the safety mechanism of LLMs.
Read more6/24/2024
🖼️
0
Nothing in Excess: Mitigating the Exaggerated Safety for LLMs via Safety-Conscious Activation Steering
Zouying Cao, Yifei Yang, Hai Zhao
Safety alignment is indispensable for Large language models (LLMs) to defend threats from malicious instructions. However, recent researches reveal safety-aligned LLMs prone to reject benign queries due to the exaggerated safety issue, limiting their helpfulness. In this paper, we propose a Safety-Conscious Activation Steering (SCANS) method to mitigate the exaggerated safety concerns in aligned LLMs. First, SCANS extracts the refusal steering vectors within the activation space and utilizes vocabulary projection to anchor some specific safety-critical layers which influence model refusal behavior. Second, by tracking the hidden state transition, SCANS identifies the steering direction and steers the model behavior accordingly, achieving a balance between exaggerated safety and adequate safety. Experiments show that SCANS achieves new state-of-the-art performance on XSTest and OKTest benchmarks, without impairing their defense capability against harmful queries and maintaining almost unchanged model capability.
Read more8/22/2024
0
New!CoCA: Regaining Safety-awareness of Multimodal Large Language Models with Constitutional Calibration
Jiahui Gao, Renjie Pi, Tianyang Han, Han Wu, Lanqing Hong, Lingpeng Kong, Xin Jiang, Zhenguo Li
The deployment of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has demonstrated remarkable success in engaging in conversations involving visual inputs, thanks to the superior power of large language models (LLMs). Those MLLMs are typically built based on the LLMs, with an image encoder to process images into the token embedding space of the LLMs. However, the integration of visual modality has introduced a unique vulnerability: the MLLM becomes susceptible to malicious visual inputs and prone to generating sensitive or harmful responses, even though the LLM has been trained on textual dataset to align with human value. In this paper, we first raise the question: ``Do the MLLMs possess safety-awareness against malicious image inputs?. We find that after adding a principle that specifies the safety requirement into the input of the MLLM, the model's safety awareness becomes boosted. This phenomenon verifies the existence of MLLM's safety-awareness against image inputs, it is only weakened by the modality gap. We then introduce a simple yet effective technique termed CoCA, which amplifies the safety-awareness of the MLLM by calibrating its output distribution. Our proposed strategy helps the model reclaim its original safety awareness without losing its original capabilities. We verify the effectiveness of our approach on both multimodal safety and understanding benchmarks.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Probing the Safety Response Boundary of Large Language Models via Unsafe Decoding Path Generation
Haoyu Wang, Bingzhe Wu, Yatao Bian, Yongzhe Chang, Xueqian Wang, Peilin Zhao
Large Language Models (LLMs) are implicit troublemakers. While they provide valuable insights and assist in problem-solving, they can also potentially serve as a resource for malicious activities. Implementing safety alignment could mitigate the risk of LLMs generating harmful responses. We argue that: even when an LLM appears to successfully block harmful queries, there may still be hidden vulnerabilities that could act as ticking time bombs. To identify these underlying weaknesses, we propose to use a cost value model as both a detector and an attacker. Trained on external or self-generated harmful datasets, the cost value model could successfully influence the original safe LLM to output toxic content in decoding process. For instance, LLaMA-2-chat 7B outputs 39.18% concrete toxic content, along with only 22.16% refusals without any harmful suffixes. These potential weaknesses can then be exploited via prompt optimization such as soft prompts on images. We name this decoding strategy: Jailbreak Value Decoding (JVD), emphasizing that seemingly secure LLMs may not be as safe as we initially believe. They could be used to gather harmful data or launch covert attacks.
Read more8/27/2024