Understanding Byzantine Robustness in Federated Learning with A Black-box Server
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Paper examines Byzantine robustness in federated learning with a black-box server
- Proposes a new framework to analyze Byzantine robustness without access to clients' models
- Conducts thorough experiments to understand how different factors impact Byzantine robustness
Plain English Explanation
In federated learning, multiple clients (e.g., smartphones) collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing their private data. However, some clients may be "Byzantine" (i.e., malicious) and try to sabotage the training process.
This paper explores ways to make federated learning more robust against such Byzantine clients, without the server having direct access to the clients' models. The researchers propose a new framework to analyze Byzantine robustness in this black-box setting.
Through extensive experiments, the paper examines how factors like client heterogeneity, model architecture, and aggregation method impact the system's resilience to Byzantine attacks. The findings provide insights into designing more secure and reliable federated learning systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by outlining the federated learning setup, where a central server coordinates the training of a shared model using data from multiple clients. However, the server may not have direct access to the clients' models, creating a "black-box" scenario.
To analyze Byzantine robustness in this setting, the researchers propose a new framework that estimates the clients' model updates based on the server's aggregated updates. They then use this estimate to detect and mitigate the impact of Byzantine clients.
The paper conducts extensive experiments to understand how different factors influence Byzantine robustness. For example, they examine the impact of client heterogeneity, model architecture, and aggregation methods. The results provide insights into designing more secure federated learning systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful approach to analyzing Byzantine robustness in federated learning without direct access to client models. The proposed framework and experimental analysis offer valuable insights, though the authors acknowledge some limitations.
For example, the framework relies on estimating client updates, which may not be perfectly accurate in all scenarios. Additionally, the experiments focus on a limited set of model architectures and attack types, so the findings may not generalize to all possible settings.
Further research could explore more complex attack strategies, as well as ways to improve the accuracy of the update estimation process. It would also be interesting to investigate the performance of the proposed approach in real-world federated learning deployments.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to understanding Byzantine robustness in federated learning with a black-box server. The proposed framework and experimental insights provide a solid foundation for designing more secure and reliable federated learning systems.
As federated learning continues to gain traction in various applications, ensuring resilience against malicious clients will be crucial. The findings from this research can help guide the development of robust federated learning solutions that can withstand Byzantine attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding Byzantine Robustness in Federated Learning with A Black-box Server
Fangyuan Zhao, Yuexiang Xie, Xuebin Ren, Bolin Ding, Shusen Yang, Yaliang Li
Federated learning (FL) becomes vulnerable to Byzantine attacks where some of participators tend to damage the utility or discourage the convergence of the learned model via sending their malicious model updates. Previous works propose to apply robust rules to aggregate updates from participators against different types of Byzantine attacks, while at the same time, attackers can further design advanced Byzantine attack algorithms targeting specific aggregation rule when it is known. In practice, FL systems can involve a black-box server that makes the adopted aggregation rule inaccessible to participants, which can naturally defend or weaken some Byzantine attacks. In this paper, we provide an in-depth understanding on the Byzantine robustness of the FL system with a black-box server. Our investigation demonstrates the improved Byzantine robustness of a black-box server employing a dynamic defense strategy. We provide both empirical evidence and theoretical analysis to reveal that the black-box server can mitigate the worst-case attack impact from a maximum level to an expectation level, which is attributed to the inherent inaccessibility and randomness offered by a black-box server.The source code is available at https://github.com/alibaba/FederatedScope/tree/Byzantine_attack_defense to promote further research in the community.
Read more8/13/2024
👀
0
Advancing Hybrid Defense for Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learning
Kai Yue, Richeng Jin, Chau-Wai Wong, Huaiyu Dai
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train a global model without sharing their local data. Recent studies have highlighted the vulnerability of FL to Byzantine attacks, where malicious clients send poisoned updates to degrade model performance. Notably, many attacks have been developed targeting specific aggregation rules, whereas various defense mechanisms have been designed for dedicated threat models. This paper studies the resilience of an attack-agnostic FL scenario, where the server lacks prior knowledge of both the attackers' strategies and the number of malicious clients involved. We first introduce a hybrid defense against state-of-the-art attacks. Our goal is to identify a general-purpose aggregation rule that performs well on average while also avoiding worst-case vulnerabilities. By adaptively selecting from available defenses, we demonstrate that the server remains robust even when confronted with a substantial proportion of poisoned updates. To better understand this resilience, we then assess the attackers' capability using a proxy called client heterogeneity. We also emphasize that the existing FL defenses should not be regarded as secure, as demonstrated through the newly proposed Trapsetter attack. The proposed attack outperforms other state-of-the-art attacks by further reducing the model test accuracy by 8-10%. Our findings highlight the ongoing need for the development of Byzantine-resilient aggregation algorithms in FL.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learning
Minghong Fang, Zifan Zhang, Hairi, Prashant Khanduri, Jia Liu, Songtao Lu, Yuchen Liu, Neil Gong
Federated learning (FL) enables multiple clients to collaboratively train machine learning models without revealing their private training data. In conventional FL, the system follows the server-assisted architecture (server-assisted FL), where the training process is coordinated by a central server. However, the server-assisted FL framework suffers from poor scalability due to a communication bottleneck at the server, and trust dependency issues. To address challenges, decentralized federated learning (DFL) architecture has been proposed to allow clients to train models collaboratively in a serverless and peer-to-peer manner. However, due to its fully decentralized nature, DFL is highly vulnerable to poisoning attacks, where malicious clients could manipulate the system by sending carefully-crafted local models to their neighboring clients. To date, only a limited number of Byzantine-robust DFL methods have been proposed, most of which are either communication-inefficient or remain vulnerable to advanced poisoning attacks. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm called BALANCE (Byzantine-robust averaging through local similarity in decentralization) to defend against poisoning attacks in DFL. In BALANCE, each client leverages its own local model as a similarity reference to determine if the received model is malicious or benign. We establish the theoretical convergence guarantee for BALANCE under poisoning attacks in both strongly convex and non-convex settings. Furthermore, the convergence rate of BALANCE under poisoning attacks matches those of the state-of-the-art counterparts in Byzantine-free settings. Extensive experiments also demonstrate that BALANCE outperforms existing DFL methods and effectively defends against poisoning attacks.
Read more7/16/2024
0
Asynchronous Byzantine Federated Learning
Bart Cox, Abele Mu{a}lan, Lydia Y. Chen, J'er'emie Decouchant
Federated learning (FL) enables a set of geographically distributed clients to collectively train a model through a server. Classically, the training process is synchronous, but can be made asynchronous to maintain its speed in presence of slow clients and in heterogeneous networks. The vast majority of Byzantine fault-tolerant FL systems however rely on a synchronous training process. Our solution is one of the first Byzantine-resilient and asynchronous FL algorithms that does not require an auxiliary server dataset and is not delayed by stragglers, which are shortcomings of previous works. Intuitively, the server in our solution waits to receive a minimum number of updates from clients on its latest model to safely update it, and is later able to safely leverage the updates that late clients might send. We compare the performance of our solution with state-of-the-art algorithms on both image and text datasets under gradient inversion, perturbation, and backdoor attacks. Our results indicate that our solution trains a model faster than previous synchronous FL solution, and maintains a higher accuracy, up to 1.54x and up to 1.75x for perturbation and gradient inversion attacks respectively, in the presence of Byzantine clients than previous asynchronous FL solutions.
Read more6/21/2024