Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores how blind users handle errors in object recognition when using camera-based assistive technology.
- It investigates the strategies blind users employ and the challenges they face in dealing with these errors.
- The research aims to inform the design of more effective and accessible object recognition systems for the blind and visually impaired.
Plain English Explanation
The paper examines how people who are blind or have visual impairments cope with mistakes made by object recognition technology. This type of technology is often used in camera-based assistive devices to help blind users identify and interact with their surroundings.
The researchers wanted to understand the different approaches blind users take when the object recognition system makes an error, such as incorrectly identifying an object. They also looked at the difficulties and frustrations these users encounter when dealing with these errors.
The goal of the study is to provide insights that can help improve the design of object recognition systems to make them more useful and accessible for people with visual impairments. By understanding the specific strategies and challenges blind users face, developers can create more effective assistive technologies that better meet their needs.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores how blind users handle errors in object recognition when using camera-based assistive technology. The researchers conducted in-depth interviews with 17 blind participants to understand their experiences, strategies, and challenges in dealing with object recognition errors.
The study found that blind users employ a variety of strategies when encountering object recognition errors, such as: [Link to related work on strategies for handling object recognition errors]
- Asking follow-up questions to get more information about the recognized object
- Using other senses like touch to verify the object's identity
- Relying on their own prior knowledge and mental models of the environment
However, the participants also faced significant challenges, including: [Link to related work on challenges of object recognition errors for blind users]
- Difficulty understanding the cause and nature of the error
- Frustration and loss of trust in the technology
- Concerns about the impact of errors on their safety and independence
The insights from this research can inform the design of more robust and effective object recognition systems for the blind and visually impaired community. By addressing the specific needs and pain points identified, developers can create assistive technologies that are more reliable, transparent, and empowering for users.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the experiences and coping strategies of blind users when dealing with object recognition errors. The researchers used in-depth interviews to gather rich, qualitative data that offers a nuanced understanding of the challenges faced by this user group.
However, the study is limited to a relatively small sample size of 17 participants, which may not fully capture the diversity of experiences within the blind and visually impaired community. Additionally, the research was conducted in a controlled setting, and the findings may not translate directly to real-world usage of assistive technologies.
[Link to related work on the importance of considering real-world usage and diverse user needs in assistive technology research]
Further research could explore the experiences of a larger and more diverse group of blind users, including those with varying degrees of visual impairment and from different demographic backgrounds. Longitudinal studies observing the long-term usage of object recognition systems in naturalistic settings could also provide additional insights into the evolving strategies and challenges faced by blind users.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable exploration of how blind users handle errors in object recognition when using camera-based assistive technology. The findings highlight the diverse strategies employed by blind users, as well as the significant challenges they face in dealing with these errors.
The insights from this research can inform the design of more effective and accessible object recognition systems for the blind and visually impaired community. By addressing the specific needs and pain points identified, developers can create assistive technologies that are more reliable, transparent, and empowering for users.
Ultimately, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the user experience and underscores the importance of centering the perspectives of blind and visually impaired individuals in the development of assistive technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Understanding How Blind Users Handle Object Recognition Errors: Strategies and Challenges
Jonggi Hong, Hernisa Kacorri
Object recognition technologies hold the potential to support blind and low-vision people in navigating the world around them. However, the gap between benchmark performances and practical usability remains a significant challenge. This paper presents a study aimed at understanding blind users' interaction with object recognition systems for identifying and avoiding errors. Leveraging a pre-existing object recognition system, URCam, fine-tuned for our experiment, we conducted a user study involving 12 blind and low-vision participants. Through in-depth interviews and hands-on error identification tasks, we gained insights into users' experiences, challenges, and strategies for identifying errors in camera-based assistive technologies and object recognition systems. During interviews, many participants preferred independent error review, while expressing apprehension toward misrecognitions. In the error identification task, participants varied viewpoints, backgrounds, and object sizes in their images to avoid and overcome errors. Even after repeating the task, participants identified only half of the errors, and the proportion of errors identified did not significantly differ from their first attempts. Based on these insights, we offer implications for designing accessible interfaces tailored to the needs of blind and low-vision users in identifying object recognition errors.
Read more8/7/2024
🤖
0
Misfitting With AI: How Blind People Verify and Contest AI Errors
Rahaf Alharbi, Pa Lor, Jaylin Herskovitz, Sarita Schoenebeck, Robin Brewer
Blind people use artificial intelligence-enabled visual assistance technologies (AI VAT) to gain visual access in their everyday lives, but these technologies are embedded with errors that may be difficult to verify non-visually. Previous studies have primarily explored sighted users' understanding of AI output and created vision-dependent explainable AI (XAI) features. We extend this body of literature by conducting an in-depth qualitative study with 26 blind people to understand their verification experiences and preferences. We begin by describing errors blind people encounter, highlighting how AI VAT fails to support complex document layouts, diverse languages, and cultural artifacts. We then illuminate how blind people make sense of AI through experimenting with AI VAT, employing non-visual skills, strategically including sighted people, and cross-referencing with other devices. Participants provided detailed opportunities for designing accessible XAI, such as affordances to support contestation. Informed by disability studies framework of misfitting and fitting, we unpacked harmful assumptions with AI VAT, underscoring the importance of celebrating disabled ways of knowing. Lastly, we offer practical takeaways for Responsible AI practice to push the field of accessible XAI forward.
Read more8/14/2024
📈
0
A Multi-Modal Foundation Model to Assist People with Blindness and Low Vision in Environmental Interaction
Yu Hao, Fan Yang, Hao Huang, Shuaihang Yuan, Sundeep Rangan, John-Ross Rizzo, Yao Wang, Yi Fang
People with blindness and low vision (pBLV) encounter substantial challenges when it comes to comprehensive scene recognition and precise object identification in unfamiliar environments. Additionally, due to the vision loss, pBLV have difficulty in accessing and identifying potential tripping hazards on their own. In this paper, we present a pioneering approach that leverages a large vision-language model to enhance visual perception for pBLV, offering detailed and comprehensive descriptions of the surrounding environments and providing warnings about the potential risks. Our method begins by leveraging a large image tagging model (i.e., Recognize Anything (RAM)) to identify all common objects present in the captured images. The recognition results and user query are then integrated into a prompt, tailored specifically for pBLV using prompt engineering. By combining the prompt and input image, a large vision-language model (i.e., InstructBLIP) generates detailed and comprehensive descriptions of the environment and identifies potential risks in the environment by analyzing the environmental objects and scenes, relevant to the prompt. We evaluate our approach through experiments conducted on both indoor and outdoor datasets. Our results demonstrate that our method is able to recognize objects accurately and provide insightful descriptions and analysis of the environment for pBLV.
Read more4/30/2024
👁️
0
Using Social Cues to Recognize Task Failures for HRI: Framework, Overview, State-of-the-Art, and Future Directions
Alexandra Bremers, Alexandria Pabst, Maria Teresa Parreira, Wendy Ju
Robots that carry out tasks and interact in complex environments will inevitably commit errors. Error detection is thus an essential ability for robots to master to work efficiently and productively. People can leverage social feedback to get an indication of whether an action was successful or not. With advances in computing and artificial intelligence (AI), it is increasingly possible for robots to achieve a similar capability of collecting social feedback. In this work, we take this one step further and propose a framework for how social cues can be used as feedback signals to recognize task failures for human-robot interaction (HRI). Our proposed framework sets out a research agenda based on insights from the literature on behavioral science, human-robot interaction, and machine learning to focus on three areas: 1) social cues as feedback (from behavioral science), 2) recognizing task failures in robots (from HRI), and 3) approaches for autonomous detection of HRI task failures based on social cues (from machine learning). We propose a taxonomy of error detection based on self-awareness and social feedback. Finally, we provide recommendations for HRI researchers and practitioners interested in developing robots that detect task errors using human social cues. This article is intended for interdisciplinary HRI researchers and practitioners, where the third theme of our analysis provides more technical details aiming toward the practical implementation of these systems.
Read more5/30/2024